Filings in the Defense of Marriage Act  and California’s Proposition 8 cases

Listed below are live links to the orders, case filings, and other information pertaining to the Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8 cases.  Click on each item to access further information.

DOMA  - Oral Argument  March 27
Prop 8 -   Oral Argument March 26

March 19, 2013

Kathleen Arberg (202) 479-3211

The Court will provide the audio recordings and transcripts of the oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. Perry, scheduled to be heard on Tuesday, March 26, and United States v. Windsor, scheduled to be heard on Wednesday, March 27, on an expedited basis through the Court's Website.
The Court will post the audio recordings and unofficial transcripts as soon as the digital files are available for uploading to the Website. The audio recordings and transcripts should be available no later than 1 p.m. on March 26 and no later than 2 p.m. on March 27.
Anyone interested in the proceedings will be able to access the recordings and transcripts directly through links on the homepage of the Court's Website. The homepage currently provides links to the orders, briefs, and other information about the cases. The Court's Website address is www.supremecourt.gov.
 

Orders
12-7-12	Grant Order
12-11-12	Amicus Appointment Order
12-14-12	Briefing Schedule
Case Filings
12-144	Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., v. Kristin M. Perry, et al. Petition for Writ of Certiorari Brief in Opposition filed by Kristin M. Perry Brief in Opposition filed by City and County of San Francisco Reply Brief Brief of Petitioner on the Merits Brief of Respondents Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffery J. Zarrillo Brief of Respondent City and County of San Francisco Reply Brief of Petitioners Dennis Hollingsworth, et al.
12-307	United States v. Edith Schlain Windsor, In Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al. Petition for Writ of Certiorari Brief in Opposition of Edith Schlain Windsor Brief in Opposition of Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Supplemental Brief of United States Supplemental Brief of Edith Schlain Windsor Supplemental Brief of Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Reply Brief Brief on the Merits for Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives Brief for Court Appointed Amicus Curiae Addressing Jurisdiction Brief of Respondent Edith Windsor (Jurisdiction) Brief of Petitioner United States (Jurisdiction) Brief of Petitioner United States (Merits) Brief of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Jurisdiction) Brief of Respondent Edith Windsor (Merits) Reply Brief of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Jurisdiction) Reply Brief of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Merits) Reply Brief of Court appointed amicus curiae (Jurisdiction) Reply of Respondent Edith Windsor (Jurisdiction) Reply Brief of Petitioner United States (Jurisdiction)

^*Disclaimer: We have provided a link to this site because it has information that may be of interest to our users.  The Supreme Court of the United States does not necessarily endorse the views expressed or the facts presented on this site.