Senate Passes $3.7 Trillion Budget, Setting Up Contentious Negotiations
Christopher Gregory/The New York Times
Senator Elizabeth Warren, left, at the Capitol in Washington on Friday before the final vote on the budget resolution.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, left, at the Capitol in Washington on Friday before the final vote on the budget resolution.
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
Published: March 23, 2013
WASHINGTON — After an all-night debate that ended just before 5 a.m., the Senate on Saturday adopted its first budget in four years, a $3.7 trillion blueprint for 2014 that would provide a fast track for passage of tax increases, trim spending modestly and leave the government still deeply in the red a decade from now.
The roll call voting records for the amendments to the budget resolution were placed on a table at the Senate Press Gallery.
Christopher Gregory/The New York Times
The roll call voting records for the amendments to the budget resolution were placed on a table at the Senate Press Gallery.
The 50-to-49 vote in the Senate, which is controlled by Democrats, sets up contentious — and potentially fruitless — negotiations with the Republican-controlled House in April to reconcile two vastly different plans for dealing with the nation’s economic and budgetary problems. No Republicans voted for the Senate plan, and four Democrats opposed it: Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Mark Begich of Alaska and Max Baucus of Montana.
All four are from red states and are up for re-election in 2014.
“The Senate has passed a budget,” Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the Senate Budget Committee chairwoman, declared at 4:56 a.m.
The House plan ostensibly brings the government’s taxes and spending into balance by 2023 with cuts to domestic spending even below the levels of automatic across-the-board cuts roiling federal programs now, and it orders up dramatic and controversial changes to Medicare and the tax code.
The Senate plan, by contrast, includes $100 billion in upfront infrastructure spending to bolster the economy and calls for special fast-track rules to overhaul the tax code and raise $975 billion over 10 years in legislation that could not be filibustered. Even with that tax increase and prescribed spending cuts, the Senate plan would leave the government with a $566 billion annual deficit in 10 years, and $5.2 trillion in additional debt over that window.
“The first priority of the Senate budget is creating jobs and economic growth from the middle out, not the top down,” Ms. Murray said. “With an unemployment rate that remains stubbornly high, and a middle class that has seen their wages stagnate for far too long, we simply cannot afford any threats to our fragile recovery.”
Republicans were harshly dismissive of the Democrats’ priorities. “Honest people can disagree on policy, but where there can be no honest disagreement is the need to change our nation’s debt course,” said Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the committee’s ranking Republican. “The singular truth that no one can escape is that the House budget changes our debt course while the Senate budget does not.”
Passage of the competing spending plans does advance a more orderly budget process after nearly three years of crises and brinkmanship. If House and Senate negotiators can agree on a framework for overhauling the tax code and entitlement programs like Medicare, Congress’s committees could go to work on detailed legislation, possibly under special rules that protect the bills from a Senate filibuster.
If the negotiations prove fruitless, the next budget crisis looms this summer when Congress must again raise the government’s statutory borrowing limit or risk defaulting on the federal debt. On Thursday, House Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio revived a rule — breached in January — that any increase in the debt ceiling must be accompanied by equivalent spending cuts.
Final passage of the Senate budget was upstaged by the process that got the senators to it, a marathon session known since 1977 as the budget “vote-a-rama.” More than 500 amendments were filed, and 70 were voted on. Those numbers dwarf previous marathon voting sessions, reflecting pent-up Republican demand for votes and a new, uncompromising view of procedure on the part of Tea Party-backed senators.
The amendments were advisory only, but they put the Senate on record on a dizzying variety of subjects, including limiting the regulation of sage grouse, preventing the United Nations from infringing on Americans’ right to bear arms, repealing a tax on medical devices that helps finance the president’s health care law and building the Keystone XL pipeline.
By 4 a.m., the senators were sitting quietly in their seats, plowing through amendments like sleepy schoolchildren, breaking only to give the Senate pages a standing ovation and to grumble when a senator demanded a roll-call vote if a voice vote would suffice. As the senators recorded their final votes, they hastily left for a two-week spring recess.
Those differences did not lend themselves to much optimism about the coming budget negotiations. “The only good news is that the fiscal path the Democrats laid out in their budget resolution won’t become law,” said Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader.
3/23/2013 @ 10:59PM
WASHINGTON - DECEMBER 16: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks to reporters after a meeting with Senate Democrats on Capitol Hill December 16, 2010 in Washington, DC. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)
After an extraordinary four year dry spell, the Senate has passed a formal budget proposal. It now goes to the House where, mark my words, it has zero chance of passing.
Despite all of the back-slapping, the bill wasn’t all that popular in the Senate. The final vote resulted in a slim victory: 50-49. All Republicans in the Senate voted against the bill, as did four Democrats: Sen. Baucus (D-MT), Sen. Begich (D-AK), Sen. Hagan (D-NC) and Sen. Pryor (D-AR). One Democrat, Sen. Lautenberg (D-NJ) did not vote.
The sticking point for most Senators was a series of tax increases worth a trillion dollars over ten years. Those tax increases, while largely unspecified, would target taxpayers at the top. To make that happen, the budget calls for special fast-track rules to overhaul the tax code (*insert fit of coughing here*).
The Senate budget is very different from the one passed in the House this week. That budget, penned by former vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan (R-WI) focuses on cutting spending, including popular health care and social programs. The significant inconsistencies make the chances of a quick reconciliation between the two unlikely.
Just before the vote, however, the Senate embarked on a so-called “vote-a-rama” addressing a number of amendments. And by “a number”, I don’t mean a few. I mean nearly 500.
Not all of the amendments made it to the Senate floor. Those that did were a mixed bag.
One amendment that had considerable support was the repeal of the tax on medical devices. The tax, which was created under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, has been at the center of controversy since it was first introduced. In particular, the tax was heavily criticized from the medical industry for potentially driving up the cost of health care and possibly sending even more jobs overseas.
Also passed? An amendment asking Senators to donate 20% of their salaries to charity to make themselves feel better about getting paid this year. You may remember that, after getting a raise at the end of 2012 despite not passing a budget or a tax deal, Congress agreed to cut their pay if they couldn’t agree on a new budget by April 15. Er, only there was a slight problem with that: it’s unconstitutional. Of course, you’d expect Congress to know that before passing such a nonsense law to begin with but it’s apparently too much to expect Congress to understand the laws that govern their own pay. So, Congress can happily proceed with budget talks with no real consequences to themselves in sight.
While we’re likely to see fierce politicking between the House and Senate over their competing plans, Congress has some breathing room as the next “crisis” won’t emerge until summer (likely, August) when Congress has to address the debt ceiling or risk a default.
Why A Vote on the Medical Device Excise Tax Is The Biggest Deal Ever for Obamacare