Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” (Part III)
|
| - Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives) Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in
North Africa, Middle East. We're doing their work, pitting ourselves
against Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia and China
|
Author’s note: This is
part three of a multi-part
interview
with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took
place in Benghazi. As previously stated, the information contained in
this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours.
Included in this update is the most current information following a more
recent interview with this insider. (Click here for
Part I and
Part II).
Events seem to be changing rapidly in Syria, and we know that the
operations in Benghazi played a very important role in Syria. Please
update the readers on the current situation, but first give a brief
recap for context.
Okay, but we’re running out of time. The world is running out of time. Remember when we first began this lengthy interview
process? It was in response to your report on September 15, 2012, just
four days after the attack in Libya. You wrote that the fuse for WW III
has been lit. It is now burning rapidly down, although people are still
not understanding what’s taking place right in front of them.
I’ll give a brief, perhaps somewhat oversimplified recap going back
to the beginning, giving context for what’s taking place at this very
moment. I suppose I cannot overstate this or say this enough. The
so-called “Arab Spring” is an initiative by Obama and his foreign policy
advisers, Clinton, in her capacity of Secretary of State, and others
including some of the most powerful people in the world.
International bankers, the power
brokers
and string pullers. It is a plan to reshape the Middle East and North
Africa, and change the geopolitical balance of power. It’s not about
some feel-good mission to free the oppressed. Never was. It’s about the
U.S., through the CIA, using groups ideologically aligned to al Qaeda
aligned to overthrow various Middle East nations to install regimes
controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.
It’s a globalist agenda, using the
blueprints
and agenda created by Saudi Arabia for the North African and Middle
East portions of the globe, to shape that area geopolitically. They are
using the United States as their surrogate and their military
muscle, and the Obama led U.S. “regime” is all too willing to comply.
With regard to Libya, it was in March of 2011 when the Clinton State Department, under orders of
Obama, appointed Ambassador Stevens
as the point man to the al Qaeda linked Libyan opposition forces to
topple Qaddafi.
Remember, Osama bin Laden was reportedly killed two
months later and al Qaeda was supposedly out of existence,
according to
Obama. But think about this. Under direct orders of Obama, Clinton
appointed Stevens to work with the very same people who reportedly
killed 3000-plus Americans on September 11, 2001 for the purposes of
overthrowing Qaddafi. It worked, and Qaddafi was deposed and murdered in
October of 2011.
Look at what happened next. Clinton announced that the U.S. was
throwing $40 million into Libya to “secure” Qaddafi’s weapon arsenals.
Oh, really? That’s what was being told to the public and to congress,
but it’s not reality, certainly not from the inside. As
I’ve already explained, that
money
and our personnel were being used to collect the weapons to send them
to Syria to topple Assad. Before getting to Syria, they were placed in
staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, and other places,
including Jordan. They were being collected and sent through northern
Libya, and the CIA operations center was the headquarters for this
operation. As I’ve said many times, there was no embassy or consulate in
Benghazi. It was a covert CIA operations center.
Wait, why do people continue to call it a consulate? Why is it identified on Google maps as a consulate.
First, it continues to be called a consulate because this is part of
the cover-up. The government is STILL lying to the American people. The
media is assisting in the cover-up, and so are some in congress in both
parties. For goodness sakes, anyone looking at Google maps on September
10, 2012 will never find the Benghazi location named a consulate. It’s a
LIE!
Sorry, please go on.
So every American understands, it is OUR tax money in part that was
used to arm Islamic groups ideologically aligned with al Qaeda. Imagine
that.
Eleven years after 9/11, we’re funding and assisting the very same
terrorists who attacked our country to topple another country. And
other countries are in this up to their necks as well. The Brits for
one. The very country or empire that created some of the post-war
borders, many knowingly unmanageable from the outset, is now in part
responsible for changing them.
Anyway, the weapons everyone in government said that were “collected”
and destroyed were pieces of junk that never worked. The working
weapons, including an estimated 10-15,000 shoulder fired missiles were
shipped out of Libya. Stevens was the head of logistics, coordinating
this operation. He was working with the Turkish consul general as well,
the guy who met with him on the night of his death. We already went over
this in detail.
The attack was perpetuated by Ansar al-Shariah, an Islamic terrorist
group backed by Iran. Also present were members of the terror group
AQIM, or al Qaeda in Northern Africa. It was a coordinated attack for a
purpose, and never, ever had anythig remotely to do with any internet
video.
Please touch on the nature of the attack again for those just catching up
As
I explained before,
I have information that three “hit teams” were dispatched to
Benghazi[iii]. Stevens was lured to the CIA compound to talk about
Russia’s knowledge of what the U.S. was doing - running weapons to be
used against Assad in Syria, which is Russia’s “red line.” They needed
to talk and not at the embassy, but at this out of the way location. The
weapons running operation, although it was winding down anyway, was
compromised. Over. Done. It is likely that the Turkish consul general
told Sevens that the Russians had evidence - proof, of weapons in
Turkey, including chemical weapons. Turkey, a NATO ally being squeezed
by Russia, wanted the weapons gone from their turf. We also had people
up there training the “rebels” on how to use the weapons as well. You
heard about
training exercises in
that area on or about September 11, 2012? Who do you think we were
training? Right after the Turkish counsel general left, the attack
against the CIA compound began.
What was the reason for the attack?
Remember the story of the Iranian Red Crescent workers being
“snatched” from the streets of Benghazi late on July 31 or the early
morning of August 1, 2012? This happened at the same time the CIA
compound wall was hit by a mortar. These Red Crescent workers were
spies. At the same time, some members of the terror group AQIM were also
picked up in Benghazi. It was a mystery! Where did they go? Who had
them?
The belief was that they were being held at the CIA compound. Iran
wanted them back. So, in addition to everything else, Ansar al Shariah
was looking for their people. AQIM were looking for their people too.
This is the reason the compound was not immediately leveled by the
weapons they had on sight. They were trying to find and free their
people, who were not being held there, but elsewhere. They were trying
to ‘smoke” the people out of the compound and rescue the “hostages.”
Plus, a message had to be sent to Obama, Clinton and others that the
weapons operation had to stop. The groups leading the attack, primarily
Ansar al Sharia with an AQIM presence as well, were tools of Iran, Syria
and of course, Russia.
So there were two reasons for the attack: get their spies back, and
expose this operation for what it was. Again, we went over this.
The snatched Red Crescent Workers play prominently into exposing this operation.
Yes, and here is where it gets interesting. They were released exactly 65 days
after they were snatched.
They were in good health and dropped off on the streets of Tripoli. But
why then? This is where it get’s damning to Obama, Clinton, and Valerie
Jarrett.
What is not widely known to Americans is that
Obama sent Iranian born Valerie Jarrett to Qatar
for high level talks with the Iranians about coming to an agreement
before the November elections. This, despite Jarrett not having the
capacity as official of the U.S. government. She had no business doing
what she was doing. That aside, the plan was that Jarrett would broker a
deal, and Obama would announce to the world that he had succeeded in
diplomatic negotiations with the Iranians where they would halt their
nuclear weapons ambitions and Obama would officially live up to his
title as savior of the world.
But before the talks kicked into high gear, the Iranians told Jarrett
that the Red Crescent workers had to be released before any talks could
be done in earnest. Jarrett relayed that to Obama and Clinton, and
then, out of nowhere, the missing workers were suddenly released.
If there were talks and the “spies” were released, then why was there no agreement?
Because Jarrett, Obama and Clinton were being played by the Iranians.
It was to buy time, especially since the Obama agenda of arming the
anti-Assad rebels was continuing. The Iranians are not stupid. They
understood that Obama and Clinton were continuing to support the
anti-Assad rebels, and with bipartisan support, STILL ARE!
So now we are hearing reports of chemical weapons planned for use by Assad. What’s the real story?
The world is being set up for a false flag operation. Obama, Clinton
and every supporter of the anti-Assad initiative are either lying to the
American people or are “dupes.” The objective remains taking out Assad
and replacing him with a Muslim Brotherhood-backed regime.
There have been reports out of the U.S. and the UK that Assad is
preparing to use chemical weapons against the rebels. Assad denies that
he would ever use them, and there is a reason we should believe him in
this case. The condemnation that would result is unnecessary and
certainly unwarranted.
There reports are to condition people to
immediately suspect Assad when a chemical incident occurs. In this case,
it’s the U.S., the UK and other Western backed countries constantly
asserting that Assad will launch a chemical attack, and we’re getting
ready just for that case.
But if you look at the evidence, it’s the anti-Assad, Western backed
forces that have taken possession of chemical storage areas. There was a
recently released video, very graphic in nature of anti-Assad rebels
conducting the test of a nerve agent on two rabbits. The video displayed
chemicals bottles with the name of a Turkish country on them. I’m not
going to give the name or video channel, but people can find the video
for themselves on YouTube.
It’s a set-up to topple Assad and put a
Muslim brotherhood leader in his place.
I told you before, and you printed what I said, that a chemical
weapon attack would justify U.S. and NATO intervention, supported by the
outcry of the world against Assad. It’s Iraq all over again, except
Syria is a hundred times more dangerous. Unlike Iraq, Afghanistan or
even Libya, Syria will not implode. It will EXPLODE, and we will be
fighting Iranians as well. Russia has “advisers” in Syria as well. Are
the American people ready and willing to square off against Iran AND
Russia in a regional conflict that will likely turn into a global, full
scale war?
What’s going on with Turkey, Syria and Russia now?
It was announced that
Turkey will receive patriot Missiles
to protect them from the spillover. Actually, these missiles over the
northern territory of Syria will create a de-facto no fly zone that will
allow the consolidation of anti-Assad rebels to perhaps install a new
Western-backed government in the northern part of Syria[vii].
Well, Russia deployed Iskander missiles into Syria, rendering the
Patriot missiles ineffective. This move shows exactly how serious Russia
is. They are not backing down.
And you know what else? Sunburn missiles are at Iran’s disposal and
can be used in that theater. Regardless of what is written or talked
about by talking heads, these missiles poses a grave threat to our
aircraft carriers. Want to see how fast we can lose an aircraft carrier
and the several thousand crew members on board? This is what we face.
Russia is doubling down, Iran is doubling down. Assad is doubling
down. Meanwhile, Obama and the U.S. State Department continue to lie to
the American people. The lie continues, and the fuse to WW III is
burning down while the Obama regime is heading full steam ahead toward
regional and global war.
Why haven’t we heard any truth about Benghazi, even from congressional investigators?
Because the lie continues, and we are still supporting the overthrow
of Assad, despite Putin’s warnings. Obama, Clinton, the global leaders
and their financiers are continuing to lead us into World War III. The
lies continue, and to continue operations, the truth must be kept from
the American public. We are continuing our operations to overthrow Assad
at full throttle right in front of all Americans. And there will be
fallout.
In addition to four dead Americans and over 40 thousand dead Syrians,
the consequences of our actions will cause the death of an estimated
FOUR MILLION in Syria alone, many Christians. When, not if the
“conflict” escalates, we’ll see many millions dead. And for what?
Okay, what’s the objective here?
Behind the smoke and mirrors is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It’s
their agenda. We’re just providing the army, the training, performing
the logistics and doing the heavy lifting. It’s the Saudi agenda, and
it’s about power, control and oil. Who do you think controls the Muslim
brotherhood? Has anyone asked why Obama, raised in a Muslim culture, is
tied at the hip with the Muslim Brotherhood?
Why aren’t Americans angry that we are using our assets, our men and
women to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia under the orders of Barack
Hussein Obama?
Why are members of congress so quick to commit our forces to oust Assad when it benefits Saudi Arabia, not the U.S?
The agenda of Obama is so overt, so “in your face” yet not one member
of congress, not one media outlet is calling him out on this. Some
might call this mere conspiracy theory. There’s a conspiracy alright,
but it involves the government and the media. They are laughing in our
faces.
In addition to the obvious regional consequences, there will be blowback from the Obama-Clinton agenda.
What type of blowback?
Well, let’s first look at what’s happened already as this insane
Obama agenda has been going on for some time. Remember the plot to kill
the Saudi ambassador to the U.S? On October 11, 2011, the FBI announced
that a plot, identified by the FBI as “Operation Red Coalition,” was
foiled to kill Saudi ambassador Adel al-Jubeir in the United States. It
was alleged that Iranian nationals were working with a Mexican drug gang
to kill al-Jubeir with a bomb while he was dining at a DC restaurant.
Do you think he would have been the only one to die there if that plan
succeeded? No, innocent men, women and children would have died as well.
Many in the media and the talking heads were having trouble
understanding why Iran or Iranian nationals would want the Saudi
Ambassador dead. Well, in the context of what you know now, does this
make a bit more sense? These events do not happen in a vacuum.
But I’m sure people will question why members of a Mexican drug
cartel would be enlisted to assist in this operation? This gets a bit
complex, but it goes back to AQIM. Remember them? That’s al Qaeda in
Northern Africa.
They are an elite Muslim terror group of perhaps 400 or
so members. They carefully screen their members, and do a lot of
subcontracting. Despite being Muslim, they are running drugs from South
America, specifically the Tri-Border Area (TBA) into North Africa for
ultimate distribution into Europe. Why Europe instead of North America?
Because the drugs are worth more there, and the profit difference is
worth it.
While drugs are being funneled from South America, terror groups are
also funneling al Qaeda terrorists or terrorists of similar ideology
into South America and into Mexico, where they are entering the United
States. Think of it as a two-lane highway. Some of these terrorists have
been caught at the southern border of the U.S., some with tattoos on
their arms of mullahs and Islamic phrases of jihad. Why? Because when
the Syria-Iran situation goes hot, there will be terrorists already
inside the United States. But we created them and gave them the reason
to be here. A few AQIM members, running the drugs east, were caught in
Benghazi, which explains their presence and getting picked up there as
well.
So Ansar al Shariah and AQIM, both present at Benghazi, were looking for their people.
But back to the blowback, or the consequences of the Obama foreign policy agenda. There is more, and it much more serious.
Attacks in the U.S?
For all intents and purposes, the United States, Russia and China are
at war. Although the situation in Syria is being described as a civil
war, it is the direct result of U.S. involvement by Obama and Clinton at
the behest of Saudi Arabia. While real bullets are flying in Syria, an
asymmetrical war exists beyond the confines of Syria’s borders.
Remember, Putin has drawn a hard line in the sand at Syria. The
stability of Syria is of extreme strategic economic and military
importance to Russia as well as China. Although no hot war exists
between Russia, China and the U.S. at the moment, that does not mean
things are not taking place behind the scenes in ways that are not
readily apparent.
One of the biggest threats to the United States right now is an
attack on the U.S. Dollar. At this moment, the fate of the U.S. dollar
hangs in the balance.
What is the U.S. dollar backed by? Gold? Silver?
Neither. Some say the dollar is not backed by anything, and although
they might be technically accurate, it’s not entirely true. At this
moment, the dollar is backed by one important thing, which is oil. The
stability of the dollar rests on the free and unimpeded flow of oil.
Once that is interrupted or even threatened, there is a high degree of
risk that the dollar will collapse.
The “string pullers” are pulling us into a situation where our
actions result in the disruption or the threat of disruption of the free
flow of oil. Given the current state of our economy, how fast might
this bring down the United States without a shot having to be fired?
Now I know I’m stepping out into some areas that people might
consider to be fringe, but think about what is taking place in the U.S.
and across the globe. People talk about global governance, or a one
order under a single currency. What’s the quickest way to destroy a
country from within? What was the major reason for the collapse of the
Soviet Union? Remember the Ruble? I can tell you this, Putin does.
So at this point, what’s an expeditious way to strike at the very
heart of America while also accomplishing other larger global
objectives? Take out the U.S. dollar.
We are in a period of heightened risk and maximum vulnerability, put
here by Obama, his foreign policy advisers, czars, and of course Hillary
Clinton. What are their objectives, and those of his closest advisers,
especially in terms of the fate of the U.S? Fundamental change in ways
that can be hardly imagined.
Are you saying that the larger objective is to destroy America?
I’m saying that we are advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia and the
Muslim Brotherhood in North Africa and the Middle East. We’re doing
their work, pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia
and China. Syria and Iran are firewalls for Russia and China. Russia and
China understand the monster created and used by the United States,
they understand the Muslim Brotherhood backed terrorists. They will not
stop at Syria. They will continue to push into the Federation of Russian
States, disrupt oil flow, overthrow nations and threaten the security
and sovereignty of Russia and threaten China. We’re playing with fire,
and to expect no consequences is ridiculous.
The path that Obama continues to take, without any objection from
congress or others in the U.S., will lead us on a path to self
destruction. Perhaps the ultimate question is whether it is by
incompetence or by design.
Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host
The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.
Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network,
and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began
using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and
increase public awareness through his website.
Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com
