Armstrong tells Oprah,
'Yes,' he used PEDs
Disgraced former Tour de France king admits doping in interview
"Yes."
That
was Lance Armstrong's response to Oprah Winfrey's initial question in
her much-publicized interview with the former seven-time Tour de France
winner, aired on Thursday night, on whether he used
performance-enhancing drugs to aid his victories in all seven of the
prestigious races.
Armstrong said a "win at
all costs" mentality and "arrogance" were behind his cheating, and
accepted blame for his mistakes, saying he deserves the scrutiny he's
now come under in the wake of being stripped of his titles.
Armstrong
answered "yes" to separate questions about whether he used EPO, whether
he partook in blood transfusions, whether he took human-growth hormone
and whether he used performance-enhancing drugs in all seven of his Tour
de France victories. He answered "not in my opinion" when asked if he
felt his accomplishments were possible without the assistance of banned
substances.
Armstrong admits to doping
|
Armstrong did insist that he did not use performance-enhancing drugs beyond 2005, and that his third-place finish in his 2009 comeback to the Tour de France was clean.
Reflecting back on his
era of cycling dominance, Armstrong said that "the winning was almost
phoned in," and he did not feel bad about using banned drugs, and
furthermore did not feel that using banned drugs was cheating,
revelations that he now, in hindsight, finds "scary." In a moment of
contrition, Armstrong said that his longtime supporters "have every
right to feel betrayed," and that he'll spend the rest of his life
apologizing to make it up to them.
On the
topic of illegal testosterone use, Armstrong had a controversial excuse,
saying he used it because he was running low on his natural supply of
the hormone due to his battle with cancer.
Armstrong
insisted that there was no directive within his U.S. Postal Service
team requiring riders to conform with the doping program in which he and
other riders partook. That stands in contrast with statements from
former teammates, notably Christian Vande Velde, who says he was
threatened with being kicked off the team before partaking in the
program.
Armstrong also confessed to being
"a bully," and wanting to control the narrative, reacting negatively to
statements he didn't like. It's a pattern of behavior Armstrong said has
followed him his entire life, and one evident in Armstrong's frequent
denials of doping over the years before and since his retirement.
When asked pointedly whether he required or expected teammates to dope for the sake of achieving a certain level of team success, Armstrong responded, "absolutely not."
Armstrong
flatly denied claims by former teammates Tyler Hamilton and Floyd Landis
that he tested positive for EPO at the 2001 Tour de Suisse and told
Hamtilton and Landis at the time that the positive test would not be
made known.
Armstrong called Landis'
decision to speak out about Armstrong's use of banned substances the
tipping point of his cover-up, along with his 2009 comeback, which
Armstrong claims did not sit well with his former teammate. Landis'
comments sparked a two-year investigation into Armstrong by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration, which in-turn sparked the USADA
investigation that resulted in Armstrong's titles being stripped and him
being banned from elite competition last year. Armstrong said he
regrets coming back to cycling, telling Winfrey, "If I didn't come back
we wouldn't be sitting here."
Armstong
hesitated before responding, "No," when asked if Dr. Michele Ferrari was
at the head of the team's doping program, but also said he was reckless
to be involved with the Italian physician and cycling coach, who's been
issued a lifetime sports ban by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency for
multiple anti-doping violations. Armstrong characterized the entire
period of his life as "reckless."
Armstrong said a donation made to UCI, cycling's chief organizing body, was made "because they asked me to," and not in an attempt to bribe officials to hide positive test results.
Winfrey pressed
Armstrong on the topic of lawsuits filed against people who spoke out
against Armstrong, among them Emma O'Reilly, a former masseuse for the
U.S. Postal Service team. "It's a major flaw," Armstrong said of
lawsuits against O'Reilly and others who were speaking the truth.
"It's a guy who expected to get whatever he wanted and control every outcome. It's inexcusable."
"It's a guy who expected to get whatever he wanted and control every outcome. It's inexcusable."
Armstrong said he called
Betsy Andreu, wife of former teammate Frankie Andreu and frequent victim
of Armstrong's verbal abuse in recent years, and had a 40-minute phone
coversation in which he saught to apologize for his behavior. However,
Armstrong refused to discuss Andreu's 2006 claim of overhearing him
discuss his doping regimen with cancer doctors at an Indianapolis
hospital in 1996. He did, though, admit to insulting Andreu and O'Reilly
with words like "crazy" and "whore," among others.
The International Olympic Committee didn't wait to listen to Armstrong's interview to act.
The
IOC on Wednesday stripped Armstrong of his 2000 bronze medal, sending
him a letter asking him to return it, according to officials who spoke
on condition of anonymity because the decision had not been announced.
Livestrong,
the cancer charity Armstrong founded in 1997 and was forced to walk
away from last year, said in a statement it expected him to be
"completely truthful and forthcoming." A day earlier, World Anti-Doping
Agency director general David Howman said nothing short of a confession
under oath — "not talking to a talk-show host" — could prompt a
reconsideration of Armstrong's lifetime ban from sanctioned events. And
Frankie Andreu, a former teammate that Armstrong turned on, said the
disgraced cyclist had an obligation to tell all he knew and help clean
up the sport.
"I have no idea what the future holds other than me holding my kids," Armstrong said in the text.
Armstrong
has held conversations with officials from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency,
including a reportedly contentious face-to-face meeting with USADA
chief executive Travis Tygart near the Denver airport. It was USADA's
1,000-page report last year, including testimony from nearly a dozen
former teammates, that portrayed Armstrong as the leader of a
sophisticated doping ring that propelled the U.S. Postal Service team to
title after title at the Tour de France. In addition to the lifetime
ban, Armstrong was stripped of all seven wins, lost nearly all of his
endorsements and was forced to cut ties with Livestrong.
According
to a person with knowledge of the situation, Armstrong has information
that might lead to his ban being reduced to eight years. That would make
him eligible to compete in elite triathlons, many of which are
sanctioned under world anti-doping rules, in 2020, when Armstrong will
be 49. He was a professional athlete in the three-discipline sport as a
teenager, and returned to competition after retiring from cycling in
2011.
That person also said the bar for
Armstrong's redemption is higher now than when the case was open, a time
during which he refused to speak to investigators. The person spoke on
condition of anonymity because he was discussing a confidential matter.
Armstrong
left his hometown of Austin, where the interview was taped at a
downtown hotel, and is in Hawaii. He is named as a defendant in at least
two pending lawsuits, and possibly a third. The Justice Department
faces a Thursday deadline on whether to join a whistle-blower lawsuit
filed by former teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of the 2006 Tour
de France title for doping.
That suit
alleges Armstrong defrauded the U.S. government by repeatedly denying he
used performance-enhancing drugs. Armstrong could be required to return
substantial sponsorship fees and pay a hefty fine. The AP reported
earlier that Justice Department officials were likely to join the
lawsuit.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment