At U.N., Egypt and Yemen Urge Curbs on Free Speech
Left, Chang W. Lee/The New York Times; right, John Minchillo/Associated Press
Chang W. Lee/The New York Times
Mr. Morsi condemned the violence resulting from an anti-Muslim film.
By NEIL MacFARQUHAR September 26, 2012
City Room: Video: Street Protests at the United Nations
(September 26, 2012)
Op-Ed Contributors: Fighting Over God’s Image
(September 27, 2012)
UNITED NATIONS — The new presidents of Egypt and Yemen
— both of whom were swept to power by uprisings demanding democratic
rights — issued clear rebuttals on Wednesday to President Obama’s ardent
defense of Western values at the United Nations, arguing that cultural
limits on rights like freedom of speech had to be respected.
President Mohamed Morsi
of Egypt, who billed his 40-minute speech to world leaders as the first
by a democratically elected leader of his country, condemned the
violence stemming from a short online video that insulted the Prophet
Muhammad and led to numerous deaths, including that of the American ambassador to Libya and three of his staff members.
But Mr. Morsi rejected Mr. Obama’s broad defense of free speech
a day earlier at the United Nations, saying “Egypt respects freedom of
expression, freedom of expression that is not used to incite hatred
against anyone.”
“We expect from others, as they expect from us, that they respect our
cultural specifics and religious references, and not seek to impose
concepts or cultures that are unacceptable to us,” said Mr. Morsi, a
former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. “Insults against the prophet of
Islam, Muhammad, are not acceptable. We will not allow anyone to do
this by word or by deed.”
On Tuesday, Mr. Obama laid out a lengthy defense of the right of free
speech as a universal value. But Mr. Morsi and other leaders signaled
that such a right could only go so far, even if the Arab world has four
new leaders because of popular revolutions demanding basic human rights.
President Abed Rabbu Mansour Hadi of Yemen opened his speech on Wednesday by demanding curbs on freedom of speech that insults religion.
“These behaviors find people who defend them under the justification of
the freedom of expression,” he said. “These people overlook the fact
that there should be limits for the freedom of expression, especially if
such freedom blasphemes the beliefs of nations and defames their
figures.”
But Mr. Hadi also noted that expressions of opinion should be peaceful,
denouncing “violence and incitement of hatred, which is contradictory to
the values of the true Islamic religion.”
Other leaders have spoken out on the issue at the United Nations.
President Asif A. Zardari of Pakistan, a country that experienced some
of the most violent riots as a result of the film, went furthest in
arguing against freedom of expression on religious matters, using his
address on Tuesday to demand that insults to religion be criminalized.
“Before I take up my speech, I want to express the strongest
condemnation for acts of incitement of hate against the faith of
billions of Muslims of the world and our beloved prophet, Muhammad,” Mr.
Zardari said, going on to enumerate the suffering caused in Pakistan by
extremism, including the 2007 assassination of his wife, Benazir
Bhutto.
“The international community must not become silent observers and should
criminalize such acts that destroy the peace of the world and endanger
world security by misusing freedom of expression,” he said. The United
Nations should take up the issue immediately, he added.
Past United Nations attempts to address the issue, summarized in a
general Human Rights Council agreement, have been deemed insufficient.
Nabil Elaraby, the secretary general of the 21-member Arab League, added
his voice to the issue, saying that spiritual harm should be treated as
a crime, even as he condemned the recent riots. “If the international
community has criminalized bodily harm, it must just as well criminalize
psychological and spiritual harm,” Mr. Elaraby told a special session
about Syria of the Security Council, saying it was a serious enough
problem to warrant Council attention.
The Arab League will pursue an international legal framework to confront
insults to religion and to ensure respect for all faiths and their
symbols, he said.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran,
in a speech on Monday at a high-level meeting on legal standards,
indirectly attacked the United States and others for defending freedom
of speech when it came to defaming religion, but there was no direct
reference to this in his main address on Wednesday. He stuck largely to
spiritual and moral themes, rather than presenting his usual annual
broadside against Israel, the lack of peace in the Middle East and
international efforts to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program.
Mr. Ahmadinejad did say that Iran was being threatened with military
action by “uncivilized Zionists” and criticized the enormous amount of
money spent on American elections, without naming the United States. He
aligned himself indirectly with Occupy Wall Street and similar protest
movements, saying the voices of the “99 percent” were not heard in
policy making decisions.
But otherwise the 35-minute appearance was a lecture about the need for a
fairer world order. As an example, he said later, Iran would soon form a
working group to tackle the Syria problem. He concluded by forecasting
at length about the peace that will prevail with the appearance of the
religious savior awaited by many faiths.
“The current abysmal situation of the world and the bitter incidents of
history are due mainly to the wrong management of the world, and the
self-proclaimed centers of power who have entrusted themselves to the
devil,” Mr. Ahmadinejad said.
But he said nothing to prompt what had become an annual walkout by
European nations over Holocaust denials and other subjects.
“Ahmadinejad gave a long, rambling speech,” said one European Union
diplomat, speaking anonymously according to his ministry’s guidelines.
“Previously we’ve walked out because of his anti-Semitism, threats
against Israel and 9/11 conspiracies. This year his only crime was
incoherence.”
Other critics noted that Mr. Ahmadinejad made laudatory remarks about
the young people who are seeking change around the world, even though
Iran crushed its own youth-fueled pro-democracy movement that contested
his re-election in 2009.
No comments:
Post a Comment