12:19
|
Matt:
Obama:
For those who don't currently have health insurance, "this law provides
an array of quality affordable private health insurance plans to choose
from." |
12:21
|
Matt:
Obama:
"Today the Supreme Court also upheld the principle People who can
afford health insurance should take the responsibility to buy health
insurance" |
12:22
|
Matt:
Obama: "The highest court in the land has now spoken. We will continue to implement this law." |
12:22
|
Kali:
Reporting
on the tone in the Court room durring the announcements, Mike Sacks at
Huff Po writes, "Summarizing his delicate decision from the bench,
Roberts reminded his listeners that it is "not our job to save the
people from the consequences of their political choices." Still, the
decision appeared to do just that." |
12:23
|
Kali:
The rest of his report is here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/supreme-court-health-care-decision_n_1585131.html |
12:24
|
Matt:
Also
discussing the courtroom as the decision was handed down: Jeff Toobin
tweets, "Roberts was red-eyed and unhappy as he read.” https://twitter.com/JeffreyToobin | |
12:26
|
Matt:
President
Obama has finished. His last line: "Today I am as confidence as ever,
that when we look back 5 years from now, or 10 years from now, or 20
years from now, we will be better off because we had the courage to pass
this law and keep moving forward."
|
12:26
|
Kali:
At
National Review Online Johnathan Adler offers some comfort for those
unhappy with the decision, "...as I understand the ruling, the opinion
does very little to enlarge the federal government’s power and, in key
respects, reinforced federalism limitations on federal power. "
|
12:27
Kali:
NRP has an "Interactive opinion" linking to key sections: http://www.npr.org/2012/06/28/155907705/interactive-inside-the-health-care-ruling
12:28
|
Kali:
Sorry "NPR"
|
12:29
|
Matt:
Ilya
Somin at Volokh Conspiracy: Although the Supreme Court upheld the
individual mandate as an exercise of the Tax Power, a majority of the
justices also ruled that it is not a legitimate exercise of Congress’
powers under the Commerce Clause. In doing so, they endorsed the
plaintiffs’ argument that the individual mandate exceeds the scope of
the Commerce power because it does not regulate “economic activity,” but
instead targets inactivity. http://www.volokh.com/2012/06/28/supreme-court-majority-endorses-activity-inactivity-distinction/
|
12:30
|
Matt:
(for Obama's statement, I was also typing as he was speaking. Apologies for any typos.)
|
12:32
|
Matt:
Scott Clement at the Washington Post discussing polling data on the popularity of the Affordable Care Act: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/six-charts-to-explain-health-care-polling/2012/06/28/gJQAlBrn8V_blog.html?tid=pm_politics_pop
|
12:35
|
Matt:
They
should be flashing on the bottom of the screen, but in case you missed
it, don't forget to check out our own coverage of the decisions.
|
12:35
|
Matt:
Lyle on the individual mandate: http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/06/dont-call-it-a-mandate-its-a-tax/
|
12:35
|
Matt:
Kevin on Medicaid expansion: http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/06/court-holds-that-states-have-choice-whether-to-join-medicaid-expansion/
|
12:35
|
Matt:
Tejinder on the Alvarez and Edwards cases: http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/06/court-holds-stolen-valor-act-unconstitutional-dismisses-first-american-financial-v-edwards/
|
12:36
|
Matt:
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi is answering questions now.
|
12:37
|
Matt:
Pelosi: "We are here to do a job for the American people. We are here to act on our beliefs."
|
12:39
|
Matt:
To answer a question from Anita S. Jackson: here is a feed of Pelosi: http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN3/
|
12:40
|
Matt:
Question
to Pelosi: Chief Justice Roberts called medicaid expansion 'a gun to
the head of states.' Why was it designed that way?Pelosi objected to the characterization. "We wrote this law very carefully." |
12:41
|
Matt:
Pelosi: "We are not bothered at all with the decision with regard to "Medicaid"
|
12:42
|
Matt:
Disclaimer
again: Any quotes from the live statements I'm typing as fast as I can.
They may not be exact, and I'm doing my best to minimize typos.
|
12:44
|
Matt:
CNN's Political Unit has quotes from various politicians reacting to the decision: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/28/political-world-reacts-to-supreme-court-ruling-on-health-care/ |
12:49
Matt:
David
Bernstein at Volokh Conspiracy writes, “I’m wondering whether a close
reading of the opinions will somehow persuade me that the individual
mandate can be a “tax” for constitutional purpose, but “not a tax” for
Anti-Injunction Act purposes” http://www.volokh.com/2012/06/28/tax-or-not-a-tax/
|
No comments:
Post a Comment