When drones were created, how they're used, and what their future looks like.
BY MICAH ZENKO | MARCH/APRIL 2012
1. The first armed drones were created to get Osama bin Laden.
In 1998, U.S. President Bill Clinton's administration shut down an operation
In 1998, U.S. President Bill Clinton's administration shut down an operation
to kill the al Qaeda leader in Afghanistan with cruise missiles, given collateral
damage estimates of 300 casualties and only 50 percent confidence in the
intelligence. As the 9/11 Commission noted, "After this episode Pentagon
planners intensified efforts to find a more precise alternative." In 2000 and
2001, the U.S. Air Force struggled to reconfigure a Hellfire anti-tank missile
to fit onto a Predator surveillance drone. Meeting one week before the 9/11
attacks, the National Security Council agreed that the armed Predator was not
ready to be operationally deployed. The first known killing by armed drones
occurred in November 2001, when a Predator targeted Mohammed Atef, a
top al Qaeda military commander, in Afghanistan.
2. So far, drones tend to crash.
On Dec. 4, an RQ-170 Sentinel surveillance drone crashed in Iran; a U.S.
official involved in the program blamed a lost data link and another
unspecific malfunction. Two weeks later, an unarmed Reaper drone crashed
at the end of a runway in the Seychelles. "This should not be a surprise," a
defense official told Aviation Week & Space Technology, saying the United
States had already lost more than 50 drones. As of July 2010, the Air Force
had identified 79 drone accidents costing at least $1 million each. The
primary reasons for the crashes: bad weather, loss or disruption of commun-
ications links, and "human error factors," according to the Air Force. As Lt.
Gen. David Deptula, former Air Force deputy chief of staff for intelligence,
has noted with refreshing honesty, "Some of the [drones] that we have today,
you put in a high-threat environment, and they'll start falling from the sky
like rain."
3. Drones are coming to America.
Worried about the militarization of U.S. airspace by unmanned aerial vehicles?
3. Drones are coming to America.
Worried about the militarization of U.S. airspace by unmanned aerial vehicles?
As of October, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had reportedly issued
285 active certificates for 85 users, covering 82 drone types. The FAA has
that 35 percent were held by the Pentagon, 11 percent by NASA, and 5 percent by
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). And it's growing. U.S. Customs
and Border Protection already operates eight Predator drones. Under pressure
from the congressional Unmanned Systems Caucus -- yes, there's already a
drone lobby, with 50 members -- two additional Predators were sent to Texas in
the fall, though a DHS official noted: "We didn't ask for them." Last June, a
Predator drone intended to patrol the U.S.-Canada border helped locate three
suspected cattle rustlers in North Dakota in what was the first reported use of
a drone to arrest U.S. citizens.
4. The scope of U.S. military drone missions is expanding…
Drones have come a long way in little more than a decade of military use in
strike operations. Five-pound backpack drones are now used by infantry
soldiers for tactical surveillance and will soon be deployed for what their
manufacturer calls "magic bullet" kamikaze missions. Special operations forces
have developed a warhead fired from a Predator drone that can knock down
doors. K-Maxhelicopter drones transport supplies to troops at forward
operating bases in Afghanistan. Balloons unleash Tempest drones, which then
send out smaller surveillance drones -- called Cicadas -- that glide to the
ground to collect data. And now the U.S. State Department is flying a small
fleet of surveillance drones over Iraq to protect the U.S. Embassy there.
Bottom line: More and more drones have been rushed into service, and their
use and application by the U.S. military is seemingly infinite.
5. …But not as fast as civilian uses.
Safety inspectors used drones at Japan's crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear
5. …But not as fast as civilian uses.
Safety inspectors used drones at Japan's crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear
power plant to survey the damage after last year's tsunami. Archaeologists in
Russia are using small drones with infrared cameras to construct a 3-D model
of ancient burial mounds. Environmental activists use the Osprey drone to
track and monitor Japanese whaling ships. Photographers are developing a
celebrity-seeking paparazzi drone. GALE drones will soon fly into hurricanes
to more accurately monitor a storm's strength. And Boeing engineers have
joined forces with MIT students to build an iPhone app that can control a drone
from up to 3,000 miles away. Last summer, using a laser 3-D printer, University
of Southampton engineers built a nearly silent drone that can be assembled by
hand in minutes.
6. Most military drones don't bomb.
Although decapitation strikes may get all the headlines, the vast majority of
6. Most military drones don't bomb.
Although decapitation strikes may get all the headlines, the vast majority of
the time, drones are used for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance --
what the military calls ISR. The U.S. Navy's first high-altitude drone can relay
black-and-white photos covering roughly half the Persian Gulf; the Global
Hawk's advanced radars make detailed images of the Earth and attempt to
sniff out chemical or biological agents for telltale signs of weapons of mass
destruction. Soon, the Gorgon Stare drone will "be looking at a whole city, so
there will be no way for the adversary to know what we're looking at, and we
can see everything," according to Maj. Gen. James O. Poss.
7. Attack drones require more boots on the ground.
Most unmanned aircraft flown by the U.S. military require not just a ground-
7. Attack drones require more boots on the ground.
Most unmanned aircraft flown by the U.S. military require not just a ground-
based "pilot," but also a platoon of surveillance analysts (approximately 19
per drone), sensor operators, and a maintenance crew. Some 168 people are
required to keep a Predator drone aloft -- and 180 for its larger cousin, the
Reaper -- compared with roughly 100 people for an F-16 fighter jet. To keep up
with the demand, the Air Force has trained more drone operators than pilots
for the past two years. The upside is that, according to the Congressional Budget
Office, drones "are usually less expensive than manned aircraft" ($15 million for
a Global Hawk versus about $55 million for a new F-16), though costly sensors
and excessive crashes can negate the difference.
8. Drones are becoming a lethal weapon of choice, but nobody's in charge.
Over the past decade, there have been some 300 drone strikes outside the
8. Drones are becoming a lethal weapon of choice, but nobody's in charge.
Over the past decade, there have been some 300 drone strikes outside the
battlefields of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. Of these attacks, 95 percent
occurred in Pakistan, with the rest in Yemen and Somalia; cumulatively,
they have killed more than 2,000 suspected militants and an unknown
number of civilians. Although U.S. President Barack Obama recently
acknowledged that "a lot of these strikes" have been in Pakistan's tribal
areas, who can be targeted and under what authority can only be guessed
from a few speeches and statements by anonymous U.S. officials. There are
believed to be multiple drone-target "kill lists" among government agencies.
The 2011 book Top Secret America revealed "three separate 'kill lists' of
individuals" kept by the National Security Council, the CIA, and the military's
Joint Special Operations Command. In Yemen, the Pentagon is the lead
executive authority for some drone strikes (which are reported to the
congressional armed services committees), while the CIA is in charge for
others (reported to the intelligence committees). As for the Obama
administration's claimed power to assassinate U.S. citizens, such as Yemeni-
American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, the Justice Department refuses to declassify
the memo that provided the legal authority to kill him with a drone. So,
although 85 percent of non-battlefield drone strikes have occurred under
Obama, we have little understanding of their use.
9. Other countries are catching up to the United States.
As with most military programs, the United States is far and away the leader
in developing drone technology, and the country is projected to account for
77 percent of drone R&D and 69 percent of procurement in the coming decade.
Nevertheless, estimates of how many other countries have at least some drone
capability now range from 44 to 70, for an estimated 680 drone programs
around the world, up greatly from 195 in 2005. China is escalating its drone
its program, including the armed "Ambassador of Death" drone, which
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad unveiled by declaring: "Its main message is
peace and friendship."
10. The drone future is already here.
The Pentagon now boasts a fleet of approximately 7,500 drones, up from just
10. The drone future is already here.
The Pentagon now boasts a fleet of approximately 7,500 drones, up from just
50 a decade ago. According to a congressional report, "manned aircraft have
gone from 95% of all [Defense Department] aircraft in 2005 to 69% today."
Over the next decade, the Pentagon expects the number of "multirole" drones
-- ones that can both spy and strike -- to nearly quadruple, to 536. In 2011, the
Teal Group consulting firm estimated that worldwide spending on unmanned
aerial vehicles will nearly double over the next decade from $5.9 billion to
$11.3 billion annually. In the future, drones are projected to: hover just behind
infantry soldiers to watch their backs; carry airborne lasers to intercept ballistic
missiles; perform aerial refueling; and conduct long-range strategic bombing
missions. Given that drones will become cheaper, smaller, faster, stealthier,
more lethal, and more autonomous, it is harder to imagine what they won't do
than what they will. Whatever limits drones face will be imposed by us humans
-- not technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment