Pages

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Murdock meets the British Parliment 2

   Live text  Reporters: Justin Parkinson and Emma Griffiths
1730:
The News of the World's behaviour "went against everything I stand for and my son too", Rupert Murdoch
says.
 
1728: Laura Kuenssberg
tweets: Murdoch on closing statement now - 'this is most humble day of my career - I know we needed to be here today'
1728:
Rupert Murdoch says he will work tirelessly to win the forgiveness of phone-hacking victims.
1728:
Mr Murdoch senior says he has made his "share of mistakes" but at no time has felt as "sickened" as he was when he found out what the Dowler family has been through.
1728:
Rupert Murdoch gives a closing statement. He says he has "great respect" for the people of Britain.
 
1726: Financial Times business columnist John Gapper
tweets: Police performance not great, all in all. Allowed protesters and custard pie thrower into the room. Made Wendi Murdoch turn vigilante
1726:
People working for him have "betrayed" him and he is the "best person to clear this up", Rupert Murdoch says. Mrs Mensch praises his "immense courage" in staying in the room following the "common assault" with the shaving foam.
1726:
Concluding her questions, Tory MP Louise Mensch asks whether Rupert Murdoch, as "captain of the ship", has considered standing down. He says he has not.
1720:
Mrs Mensch asks whether journalists at the News of the World felt entitled to use hacking as it was "part of the general culture of corruption" in the tabloid press. James Murdoch says it is not for him to "impugn" other titles.
 
1719: Digital Maverick
tweets: Credit to the Murdochs for deciding to continue with the questioning in spite of what happened
1718:
Mrs Mensch says the actor Jude Law is alleging his phone was hacked on US soil. She asks about the families of 9/11 victims. Rupert Murdoch replies there is no evidence that their phones were hacked.
1716:
Louise Mensch MP asks about any reports of phone hacking in News Corp businesses outside the UK. James Murdoch says he has not heard any and reiterates that employees are asked to comply with a code of ethics.
1712:
James Murdoch, returning to business, says it is customary for both sides in an out-of-court settlement to agree confidentiality.

1711: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
Police say they've arrested a man following the attack on Rupert Murdoch. According to one of the committee members Paul Farrelly, the assailant made for Rupert Murdoch with what appeared to be a paper plate with shaving foam on it, in the form of a custard pie. The committee room corridor has been sealed off by police.
 
1710: Tweetminster
tweets: Quite a few tweets claiming that the man who attacked Rupert Murdoch is on Twitter: @JonnieMarbles http://bit.ly/rpfe27
1709:
The session is restarted after 15 minutes. Tory MP Louise Mensch continues her questioning. She praises Mr Murdoch's "immense guts" for facing the committee.
1708:
Labour MP Chris Bryant, who is attending the hearing, tells the BBC the plate of shaving foam was shoved in Rupert Murdoch's face. He says it is a "despicable" thing to do, especially to a man of more than 80 years of age.
1707:
Committee
The moment when a protester attacked Rupert Murdoch with shaving foam.
 
1705: Labour MP Tom Harris
tweets: And once again a Gap Year Anarchist succeeds in his lifetime's ambition: to get all the attention. Well done. *slow hand clap*
1701:
James Murdoch looked shocked that security staff had failed to protect his father properly, Nick Robinson says.
1701:
Nick Robinson says Rupert Murdoch's wife was "up like a shot" to defend her husband.
1659:
BBC political editor Nick Robinson says Rupert Murdoch was apparently hit in the face with a plate of shaving foam by a man shouting: "Greedy."
1657:
A man with white substance - possibly paint - on his face has been taken away by police following the incident.
1656:
Rupert Murdoch's wife Wendi stood up and appeared to strike somebody in defence of her husband.
1655:
Rupert Murdoch appears to have been attacked by somebody in the public gallery.
1654:
The sitting is suspended for 10 minutes - after some kind of disturbance.
1653:
Mr Murdoch tells MPs how the Brown and Murdoch children used to play together and how their wives "struck up a great friendship". He thought the former PM had "great values". He hopes the relationship can be rebuilt in the future, adds Mr Murdoch.
1651:
Rupert Murdoch says he is "sorry" that he no longer has a friendship with Gordon Brown - who launched a scathing attack on News International last week in the Commons.
1649:
Damian Collins asks if Rupert Murdoch has a "cultural problem" with advisers saying what he wants to hear. The media magnate says it is up to him to "see through" people trying to please him.
1645:
Rupert Murdoch says that when the Daily Telegraph bought stolen documents on MPs' expenses it caused a huge outcry. He adds that Singapore is the cleanest society in the world, as every minister is paid at least one million dollars a year and has no temptation to transgress. "Good luck in selling that one," Damian Collins replies.
 
1644: Television presenter and ex-NoW editor Piers Morgan
tweets: Rupert called me every week for 18ms on News of the World - rarely asked about anything but what stories we had that week. #Murdoch
1643:
Conservative MP Damian Collins - the second from last MP on the committee to have a go at questioning the Murdochs - asks if it is right that people in public life can expect total privacy. Rupert Murdoch's brief reply: "Nope."
1642:
Alan Keen is calling Murdoch Sr "Mr Rupert". Earlier Philip Davies was calling Murdoch Jr "James". Perhaps they should have worked this one out beforehand...
1641:
Mr Keen says Rupert Murdoch's desire to protect Rebekah Brooks was "admirable", but asks if he regrets that News International has become a "family organisation". The media mogul replies that his son went through a proper recruitment process.
1639:
James Murdoch tells Labour's Alan Keen he understands "completely" the MP's frustration that News International's original denials over hacking were "too strong".
 
1638: David Jackson in Chelmsford
emails: To Kerry Douglas, the objective is to not trip up the Murdochs, it is to ellicit how such appalling media practices have been allowed to go on. This is not acceptable in the UK.
 
1636: BBC News website reader
texts: I'm watching the Murdoch 'GRILLING' by MPs......more like a gentle poaching if you ask me!
1636:
Rupert Murdoch says that "nobody kept me in the dark", but he might not have found out about a "small part of my business". The situation has become "extremely serious", he tells the committee.
 
1634: Mark Reckless MP
tweets: New Blogpost: What About The CPS? http://fb.me/182H2QyqF
1633:
Rupert Murdoch is asked whether it was "possible" that the editor of a newspaper did not know that staff acted as "gatekeepers" for a private investigator. Rupert Murdoch says it is important to find out what was going on.
1630:
Back to the hearing: Paul Farrelly says it is not known whether News International was complicit in keeping back information. Rupert Murdoch says he does not find the situation satisfactory.
 
1629: Editor in Chief of Guardian Newspapers Alan Rusbridger
tweets: James M : I was 'surprised and shocked' we were paying Mulcaire's fees Doesn't read the Guardian then http://bit.ly/gCn8gy
 
1628: Kerry Douglas in Cairns, Australia
emails: The Murdochs doing very well indeed. Very patient with the ridiculous petty questions, don't these committee members understand the level these men work at in running a corporation of this size? Fancy asking a CEO and a chairman of a company that employs 56,000 people a question about petty cash. If this committee's aim was to trip up the Murdochs or descredit them then they have failed.
 
1627: Tim Colman in Norwich, UK
emails: The Murdochs have, so far, said nothing of substance or consequence. The enquiry, as is, could have been over in 5 minutes if they'd just read their opening statement. What a waste of time. What a shame.
 
1626: John Cooper QC Criminal Law & Justice Weekly
texts: These are speeches not questions. Why no lawyers on the committee?
1625:
The hearing was scheduled for about an hour. It's nearing the two-hour mark now.
1624:
Asked why proceedings by Goodman and Mulcaire for unfair dismissal were settled, James Murdoch says it is important "not to stray" into allegations about individuals, given the police investigations under way.
 
1619: Tory Press HQ
tweets: Alistair Campbell Diaries: 'TB left for a memorial service and came back for lunch with Murdoch. We got him through the back door...'
1618:
Labour has responded to some of the earlier evidence given to the home affairs committee, Yvette Cooper says it is "astonishing" that the PM's chief of staff reportedly turned down an offer by Mr Yates to brief him on some aspects of the phone hacking case and advised Met chiefs not to brief the PM about the employment of Neil Wallis.

1615: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
Some fall out from the home affairs committee hearing with John Yates. Mr Yates mentioned that the prime minister's chief of staff Ed Llewellyn had rejected the offer of a briefing on phone hacking. No 10 has now released the relevant emails. In his email to Mr Yates, Mr Llewellyn doesn't use the term "phone hacking" - rather he talks of "other matters which have caught your attention this week" but says "we will want to be entirely clear - for your sake and ours - that we have not been in contact with you about this subject." In his evidence Mr Yates suggests this is a "proper" response to his offer.
 
1613: BBC's Robert Peston
Rupert Murdoch does not deny that Les HInton will receive many millions of dollars in compensation following resignation
 
1612: Lord Sugar
tweets: Next MP question: Mr Murdoch senior can you tell me how much red ink and black in is used each day on Sun's print run
1610:
Rupert Murdoch says he would "like to" stop all payments to Mr Mulcaire. Providing it is not in breach of a legal contract. He will ensure this happens, he adds.
1609:
James Murdoch says he does not know the "precise status" of whether the company is still contributing to Mr Mulcaire's legal fees.
1609:
Labour MP Paul Farrelly asks if News International has been paying Glenn Mulcaire's legal fees during the course of the civil actions. James Murdoch says he does not know the details but adds that he was "shocked" to find some of the private investigator's fees had been paid.
1605:
Ending the News of the World after 168 years was the "right choice", James Murdoch says, adding that News International is doing anything it can to find new employment for laid-off journalists.
1605:
James Murdoch says the closure of the News of the World was "grave thing", but the "hurt" caused by phone hacking was worse.
1603:
There is nothing in the leaving settlements of Rebekah Brooks or Les Hinton which would compromise their ability to help any inquiries, James Murdoch says.
1602:
Philip Davies asks if the Murdochs regret ending the News of the World to "save" Rebekah Brooks. The two decisions were "totally unrelated", Rupert Murdoch says
.
1559:
Rebekah Brooks's resignation was accepted after the second time she offered it, as she was in a "state of extreme anguish", Rupert Murdoch says.
1559:
Rupert Murdoch says executive Les Hinton resigned last Friday, saying: "I was in charge of the company and I feel I must step down."
1558:
Such legal payments would have been "above" managing editor level, Rupert Murdoch says. It "could have been" Les Hinton or a chief legal officer, he adds.
1556:
Tory MP Philip Davies asks if Clive Goodman and Glen Mulcaire received any payments after their conviction. James Murdoch says he was "very surprised" to find the company had helped with legal fees. He does not know who made the arrangements, he adds.
 
1555: BBC Newsnight's Michael Crick
tweets: Are Clive Goodman + Glenn Mulcaire now free to speak publicly, as far as Murdochs are concerned?
1555:
At the start of the committee hearing the Murdochs asked to be able to read out a statement - chairman John Whittingdale said they could submit it - but not read it out loud. For those interested - here's the statement in full
 
1553: Former Labour minister Denis MacShane
tweets: Sorry but I don't think a glove has been laid on Murdochs so far. Maybe transcipt will prove new facts, admissions but I doubt it
 
1552: Dominic Campbell
tweets: Such a weird damp squib of a very British passive aggressive committee on the whole. I want US courtroom style. Led by @Tom_Watson.
1552:
James Murdoch is asked why ex-Sky football pundit Andy Gray's reported payout of £20,000 was so much lower than those for Mr Clifford and Mr Taylor. He again says that losing the earlier cases would have meant "substantial" costs, if they had gone to court and damages and legal fees had been payable.
1551:
Rupert Murdoch says there was "apparently" a contract with Max Clifford that was cancelled by Andy Coulson.

1551: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
Initially a rather optmistic hour was set aside to quizzing the Murdochs - this seems to have some way to run, so we will have to wait a while to see Rebekah Brooks
1550:
Asked if he "overpaid" Gordon Taylor or Max Clifford, James Murdoch says he made a judgement on Mr Taylor based on advice.
1547:
Rupert Murdoch says he works a 10 or 12-hour day and "I cannot tell you the multitude of issues I handle". The News of the World was "small" in this context, he adds.
 
1546: Guardian journalist Paul Lewis
tweets: Whittingdale needs to take command quick or the Murdochs will slip away unharmed
1546:
Rupert Murdoch says he spoke to the News of the World's editor "very seldom", but he rings the Sunday Times almost every Saturday.
1546:
Asked about what coaching they have had ahead of the hearing, James Murdoch says he and his father were just advised to be as transparent as possible and that is what they have tried to do.
1544:
Rupert Murdoch says News International was never guilty of "wilful blindness" on phone hacking.
1544:
As soon as News International had information suggesting a "wider involvement" in phone hacking in 2010, the company acted, James Murdoch says.
1541:
Here's a clip of Rupert Murdoch telling the committee he is M'ashamed of what happened', for those that missed it.
1538:
James Murdoch says the high amounts paid out were not to buy confidentiality.
1535:
The sole Lib Dem on the committee - Adrian Sanders - asks about out-of-court settlements.
1535:
James Murdoch says he would still have settled out of court as he did before, but also contacted the police and other individuals involved immediately.
1534:
James Murdoch says the "critical" information on phone hacking came to light during 2010.
 
1533: TV presenter and ex-NoW editor Piers Morgan
tweets: Good pertinent questions from @tom_watson - rest of the MPs hopeless so far. #Murdoch
1531:
Banging the table for emphasis again, Rupert Murdoch says the UK greatly benefits from having a competitive press and a transparent society.
1532:
John Whittingdale asks if NI plans to open a new tabloid Sunday newspaper. James Murdoch says there are "no immediate plans for that", says the BBC's Iain Watson.
1530:
The press industry needs to think about its ethics, James Murdoch says.
1529:
Grilled by Tory MP Therese Coffey on whether his paper's will now change their ways, Rupert Murdoch says the UK has a "wonderful variety of voices", with media outlets "naturally competitive".
1527:
The company's rules and code of conduct are promoted to all staff, James Murdoch says.
1527:
Rupert Murdoch says each newspaper has an editorial manager who has to approve expenses claims for every reporter. Reports have "no authority" to do so on their own.
1527:
Back to the evidencenow: Sometimes it is appropriate for journalists to use cash to make outside payments, but it is "customary" for them to record this, James Murdoch says.
1525:
BBC political editor Nick Robinson has blogged from inside the Wilson Room: "It is hard to equate the man sitting a few feet away from me with the global media mogul feared by political leaders throughout my adult lifetime".
 
1523: Pop singer George Michael
tweets: It must be great to be so close to your own father that he can use u as a human shield. Dad of the year....
1522:
For the full board of News Corp to be consulted on payments, the sum would have to be "in millions", James Murdoch tells the MPs.
1521:
Rupert Murdoch reaches over and touches his son's arm as he interrupts him while talking about out-of-court payments.
1521:
News International could make out-of-court settlements without going to News Corp, James Murdoch says.
 
1520: BBC News website reader
texts: Playing the poor old man in court card. Pretending he cant hear taking ages to answer awkward questions. Son keep butting in etc. All an act.
 
1520: Andy, Southampton
texts: Rupert sounds stunned by what is happening - James just sounds pushy.
1520:
On the out-of-court payment to footballers' union boss Gordon Taylor, which some have claimed was to buy his silence on phone hacking, James Murdoch says the "underlying interception was not a disputed fact" and the company was likely to lose the case. In that case, the cost could have reached as much as £1m, he adds.
1519:
Asked by Tory MP Therese Coffey if the NoW closure was a commercial decision, Rupert Murdoch says: "Far from it."

1518: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
Rupert Murdoch denies responsibility for what Labour MP Jim Sdheridan describes as "this fiasco".
1517:
Rupert Murdoch says the News of the World was closed after a discussion by the whole News Corp board.
 
1516: Stephen Grey
tweets: V interesting admission by Murdoch that political stance is a group decision - surely violation of terms of original Times purchase?
1516:
The home affairs committee finished 20 minutes ago. Much of the questioning focused on the decision to employ a former News of the World deputy editor, Neil Wallis, to provide media support to the police. Mr Yates agreed he was a friend but says "codswallop" has been written about how close they were. He also said he had stood up to be accountable and suggested News International chiefs should do the same.
1514:
James Murdoch says all the company's financial dealings are transparent.
1514:
Rupert Murdoch says he is not responsible for the scandal, but some of those he trusted.
1513:
The victims of voicemail interceptions have had compensation schemes set up, James Murdoch says.
1512:
James Murdoch says the stain on the company's reputation from the News oof the World scandal is a "matter of huge and sincere regret".
1512:
News International's competitors have aroused "hysteria" leading to News Corp's decision not to go ahead with its intended takeover of BSkyB, Rupert Murdoch says
.

1511: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
Rupert Murdoch seems to have livened up somewhat when asked by Labour's Jim Sheridan about hacking 9/11 victims phones but he says "no evidence" for this
1510:
Rupert Murdoch occasionally seems to struggle to remember details he is being asked for - asked about a meeting with Tony Blair he frowns, then suggests it was arranged "by Mr Campbell".
1509:
The FBI has found no evidence of wrongdoing in the US, Rupert Murdoch says.
1509:
Rupert Murdoch also visited Gordon Brown via the back door of 10 Downing Street several times, he says.
1508:
Rupert Murdoch says he was invited to 10 Downing Street within days of the last election to "have a cup of tea" and be thanked for his support by David Cameron.

1508: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
News just in - the regular press briefing for lobby journalists from the prime minister's spokesman has been cancelled.
1507:
"I just did what I was told," says Rupert Murdoch when asked why he came in through the back door at Number 10.
1506:
Mr Watson asks why Rupert Murdoch "risked the jobs of 200" people at the News of the World, but not his son or Rebekah Brooks. He replies that the company was "ashamed" of what had happened.
 
1505: Will Straw
tweets: Brilliant forensic probing by @Tom_Watson #hackgate
 
1505: Lord Sugar
tweets: Bloody stupid questions to Rupert about micro detail when N.O.W represents 1% of his empire. Waste of time trying humiliate the old man.
1504:
Rupert Murdoch says NI must deal "appropriately" with those involved in wrongdoing. James Murdoch says many of the people implicated in civil litigations have left the company.
1504:
Despite the packed public benches in the committee room for the committee hearing - the room is silent as Rupert Murdoch slowly responds to Mr Watson's questions.
 
1503: BM from Eyemouth, Berwickshire
e-mails: Rupert M seems rather too frail to deal with the situation. Tom Watson is showing considerable tact and skill as he pursues the issues. Admirable.
1502:
NI was "100% cooperative" with police investigations, Rupert Murdoch says.
1502:
James Murdoch says it would be "more helpful" to ask him about details of decisions. Mr Watson replies it is "revealing in itself" what Rupert Murdoch does not know.
1501:
Tom Watson - the man who once shouted that Michael Gove was a "miserable pipsqueak" across the Commons - is being very softly spoken in his questioning of Rupert Murdoch.
1502:
Rupert Murdoch was not told that the culture committee had found NI executives guilty of "collective amnesia", he says.
1500:
Tom Watson asks at what point he became aware criminality was "endemic" at the News of the World. Another pause. Rupert Murdoch is not happy with word "endemic" but says he was "shocked" and "appalled" by the Millie Dowler revelations.
1459:
The settlement to Mr Taylor was "below the approval thresholds" which would need Rupert Murdoch's approval, his son says.
1458:
James Murdoch says his father became aware of the settlement to Mr Taylor after it had been made in 2009.
1457:
Rupert Murdoch says he was not informed of out-of-court payments to Gordon Taylor and Max Clifford.
1457:
Big pauses while Rupert Murdoch considers Mr Watson's questions, before referring on matters of detail to James, who wants to step in and answer them.
1456:
Mr Murdoch leans forward to listen to Mr Watson's questions. He thinks carefully before answering. Tom Watson asks - in a very measured way - about the 2006 internal News International report on phone hacking.
1454:
Electrifying exchanges between Tom Watson and Rupert Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch says he was not aware that a reporter had been found guilty of blackmail.
1453:
Asked why NoW chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck was not dismissed following the Max Mosley case, Rupert Murdoch replies: "I'd never heard of him."
1452:
Tom Watson asks what News International did after the arrest of Glen Mulcaire and Clive Goodman. Rupert Murdoch says it employed a leading firm of lawyers to investigate it further.
 
1451: Laura Kuenssberg
tweets: Rupert M accepts someone lied to him, 'Clearly'
1451:
Rupert Murdoch says the News of the World was less than 1% of his company. Tapping his desk to make his point, he says he employs people on trust to run his divisions.
1449:
Rupert Murdoch says "Yes" when asked by Labour's Tom Watson whether the company had a "zero tolerance" attitude to wrongdoing. He agrees that it was misled.
1449:
James Murdoch says he has no knowledge that Rebekah Brooks or Les hinton knew about phone hacking. Their resignations were accepted on that basis, he adds.
1449:
News International's provision of information that led in part to the re-opening of police investigations into hacking show the company's approach, James Murdoch tells the committee.
1446:
It is a matter of "deep frustration" and "real regret" that the facts did not emerge earlier, James Murdoch says.
1445:
It was not clear in 2008 and 2009 that there were any extra matters to be dealt with, James Murdoch says. He says the "critical new facts" arose in the civil trials at the end of 2010.
1445:
James Murdoch says that this followed the successful prosecutions of 2007 and the resignation of Andy Coulson as NoW editor. The company relied on legal opinion from outside that there was no additional illegality, he adds.
1444:
Mr Whittingdale says that, when his committee took evidence in 2009, all the News International executives said there had been a thorough investigation and no more evidence found. Was this a lie, he asks.
1443:
James and Rupert Murdoch
The Murdochs address MPs on the culture committee, while Rupert's wife Wendi watches from the public gallery.

1442: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
James Murdoch opens with an apology - he was denied an opening statement by the chairman but he is clearly delivering it anyway. His father adds a truncated version of his own -'the most humble day in my life.' Of course worth remembering he needed to be summonsed by MPs, and did not volunteer to give evidence on this day.
1441:
News International alerted the police and re-started the investigation now under way. It has admitted liability in some cases and apologised unreservedly, James Murdoch says.
1440:
James Murdoch continues, saying that he came to realise that potentially more people had been involved in hacking, following hearings in 2009.
1439:
Rupert Murdoch interrupts his son to say: "This is the most humble day of my life."
1439:
Mr Whittingdale asks James Murdoch why he admitted previously that Parliament had been misled by News International statements. Mr Murdoch apologises, saying it is a matter of sadness to the company and to him and his father.
 
1438: Daily Mirror associate editor Kevin Maguire
tweets: Rupert Murdoch looked relaxed going into the Commons hearing. His son James, however, was bricking it
1437:
Some protesters, holding up signs, are removed from the Boothroyd Room, at the request of committee chairman John Whittingdale.
1436:
The Murdochs, both wearing dark suits, pour some water. James Murdoch asks to make an opening statement. Committee chairman John Whittingdale refuses, saying they can do so after the hearing.
1434:
The moment has arrived. Rupert and James Murdoch are in place for their session with the culture committee.
 
1433: Political Editor of Sky News Adam Boulton
tweets: Many Qs unasked but Home Affairs Chm Keith Vaz must want to wrap this before 2.30when Chm John Whittingdale opens CMSSC Murdoch hearing.
1431:
Newspapers will, on a weekly basis run interesting articles - but police won't launch investigations on the back of all of them, Mr Yates tells the MPs.
1431:
Labour's Alun Michael says everyone expected him to look broadly at the old police investigation into hacking. Mr Yates disagrees, saying it was just a case of "looking at what's new" and deciding whether it merited a fresh investigation.
1429:
A moment of levity as Mr Vaz assures Mr Yates he will be out of there before the next witness arrives - at 5.30pm. "I'm enjoying myself so much," jokes Mr Yates
1428:
Has there been a fair allocation of blame between the Met and CPS? Mr Yates says not - the Met had taken legal advice. "It is utterly, absolutely clear what advice we got - anybody who says a police investigation isn't framed by legal advice doesn't live in the real world."
1427:
"This wasn't a body being found, this was an article in a newspaper," he adds, referring to The Guardian article that reignited interest in phone hacking.
1426:
"You can criticise me with hindsight but it was a reasonably sophisticated process to go through around an article in a newspaper," says Mr Yates.
1426:
Mr Yates says, of his hacking review, it wasn't a case of "finger in the air, I don't fancy it" - it was reasonably sophisticated in terms of the points covered, he says. "I had been assured that the material had been reviewed by counsel," he adds.

1425: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
John Yates says the PM's head of staff Ed Llewellyn turned down the offer of a briefing on the "scoping" of an investigation following New York Times stories on phone hacking (that appears to be September 2010) - John Yates said he didn't speak to Andy Coulson about this - but did speak to him when he was at No10 on the unrelated topic of police reform.
1424:
Commons Speaker John Bercow has refused to allow a new vote to enable Labour MP Cathy Jamieson to sit on the culture committee, which will question Rupert and James Murdoch. Her appointment to the committee was blocked by a Tory MP last night. A point of order was raised by the shadow leader of the House Hilary Benn, seeking a change to the timetable to allow a vote before the committee starts, but Mr Bercow said he was unable to do this.
1423:
Assistant Commissioner John Yates again stresses he did not carry out a full "review" of the original police investigation into hacking - he just tried to establish certain facts around the case.
1421:
Mr Yates says he met Andy Coulson but did not discuss phone hacking with him - or Neil Wallis.
1421:
Mr Yates goes through his phone call with Neil Wallis about a potential contract with the Met - he says he received "categorical assurances" that there was nothing still being investigated by the Guardian that could embarrass the Met.
 
1420: NOTW Hacking News
tweets: Biographer Michael Wolff is suggesting Rupert Murdoch could resign before the culture committee.
1419: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
John Yates repeats allegation of last week: "News International completely covered-up" phone hacking - no doubt this will be put to the Murdochs and Rebekah Brooks when they come before the culture and media committee shortly.
1416:
He predicts a "very small number of police officers" will be jailed for corruption over the phone hacking saga.

1415:
Mr Yates's words are again quoted back at him that he made a "crap decision" not to reopen the phone hacking investigation - but he stresses that he meant that in the context of what he knows now.
1414:
Mr Yates stresses that Mr Wallis is still an "innocent man".

1413: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
Rather like an edition of the recently revived game show "Mr and Mrs", Keith Vaz points out that John Yates wasn't able to listen to Mr Fedorcio's evidence earlier. Like that show, sometimes answers don't match up.

1412: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
John Yates says it was down to PR chief Mr Fedorcio to carry out "due diligence" on Neil Wallis - not him. Mr Fedorcio, for his part, said it was John Yates who assured him Mr Wallis's contract wouldn't embarrass the Met.
1411:
Keith Vaz asks which officials were trying to "protect the prime minister" from certain information - for example the employment of Mr Wallis. Mr Yates says in 2010 there was an offer to brief Mr Cameron's chief of staff on the nuances of what a "scoping exercise" was - following a New York Times article. There was some confusion about language. The offer was rejected, he says.

1410:
More from David Cameron's press conference in Nigeria. Addressing the resignations of Met commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson and assistant commissioner John Yates, the PM says: "Paul Stephenson and John Yates have made their decisions. They have made honourable decisions. I thank them for the service they have given."
1409:
Lib Dem Julian Huppert asks whether an assistant commissioner sending an email to the Met's HR department was usual - Mr Yates says the director of HR would have "aborted the process" if there was anything wrong with it.
1408:
Asked whether he was close friends with Mr Wallis - Mr Yates says he met him two or three times per year over six years or so: "I don't go round to his house on a regular basis," he says - adding he may have done so once to pick him up for a football match. he accepts he is a friend but says they are not "bosom buddies living in each others' houses".
 
1407: Political Animal
tweets: Yates: "I was a postbox." And I'm a little teapot.
1407:
He repeats the phrase again: "I was simply a post box". It happens all the time, he adds - pointing out that MPs employ relatives. He denies having secured a job for her - saying he sent one email on her behalf and he gave only an "equivocal interest" in whether she was employed or not.
1406:
Interesting choice of words from Mr Yates on his alleged nepotism: "I simply acted as a post box for an application". He is accused of securing a job at the job at the Met for Neil Wallis's daughter.
1403:
Mr Yates says it is "slightly over-egging the pudding" to suggest he had carried out "due diligence" - he had simply sought categorical assurances from Mr Wallis that he had done nothing to do with phone hacking that could embarrass the force. He says it was not "due diligence".

1403: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
It is interesting to see how what appeared to be normal behaviour now looks very different once viewed through the post-hacking prism. Mr Fedorcio says he knew nothing of the first hacking investigation until arrests were made and didn't advise senior officers on their decisions to dine with News International. Keith Vaz summed up the MPs' quizzing of the PR chief thus: "We are not any clearer than we were when we started."
1402:
Keith Vaz starts by referring to the employment of Neil Wallis - Mr Yates had done "due diligence" and advised Mr Fedorcio Mr Wallis was fine to take on.

1401: Iain Watson Political correspondent, BBC News
All fingers so far are pointing to John Yates - Dick Fedorcio said he never personally asked Neil Wallis any questions about phone hacking - he took an assurance from John Yates that Mr Wallis's contract wouldn't embarrass the Met.
1400:
Keith Vaz starts by asking why Mr Yates resigned. He says it's because phone hacking had become a huge distraction from his main role - as head of counter terrorism.
1400:
John Yates is back in front of the home affairs committee - just a week after his last appearance.
1358:
Mr Fedorcio says the first time he became aware of phone hacking was when he returned from leave in August 2006. The only dinner he attended with Andy Hayman and News International was in April 2006, while the hacking investigation was happening. He says he had no knowledge at the time of the investigation and says it would have been inappropriate for him to know at the time.
1355:
Mr Fedorcio says he did not give preference to News International when "placing stories" in the media. He also says he only found out Mr Wallis's daughter was working at the Met yesterday.
1354:
Mr Fedorcio says he discovered Mr Wallis was working independently in "mid-August" - asked if it was Rebekah Brooks that recommended him, Mr Fedorcio says "certainly not". He says he does not believe he was recommended by someone at News International.
1351:
Mr Fedorcio says he talked to John Yates about hiring Mr Wallis specifically because of his involvement in the phone-hacking investigation. He adds he has "no reason to doubt" Mr Yates's integrity.
1350:
In the committee room Tory MP Nicola Blackwood suggests it was not appropriate for Mr Yates to do "due diligence" on his friend - Mr Fedorcio says he had no reason to doubt Mr Yates's integrity
1350:
After his appearance, Sir Paul Stephenson has issued the following statement: "Today's almost certainly my final professional public engagement after almost 36 years of policing."
1347:
Mr Fedorcio says he knew Mr Yates was a personal friend of Mr Wallis - Keith Vaz questions why he allowed Mr Yates to carry out due diligence on the former NoW deputy in that case.
1346:
Mr Wallis was employed to help with "corporate policy matters" - not "operational activity" says Mr Fedorcio. He says he "never" discussed the phone-hacking scandal with Mr Wallis.
1343:
Did the Met go out to tender for the contract to hire Mr Wallis? Mr Fedorcio says he got three quotes and of those, Mr Wallis, was "by far the cheapest".
1342:
David Cameron, who is in Nigeria, describes the death of the former News of the World journalist Sean Hoare as "a tragedy".
1342:
Lib Dem Julian Huppert asks why the directorate of public affairs has not declared any hospitality since 2009 - Mr Fedorcio says until recently only the commissioner and deputy commissioner's hospitality was published.
 
1341: Conservative Declan Lyons
tweets: 45 people doing comms for Met Police seems mad, but 10 of them being former NotW employees seems even madder. #hackgate
1340:
Mark Reckless asks why there are 50 people working on PR for the Met - shouldn't they be catching criminals? Mr Fedorcio says there is enormous media interest in the police and the press office takes pressure off officers.
1340:
Mr Fedorcio says he cannot remember exactly what Mr Yates said, but as far as Mr Yates was concerned - there was nothing that could embarrass the force in employing Mr Wallis.
1340:
Mr Winnick asks why a man of his experience did not ask Mr Wallis himself about phone hacking. Mr Fedorcio says Mr Yates put the question - and that was "more than enough times".
1339:
Mr Fedorcio says having considered him as a consultant - he spoke to John Yates who conducted "a form of due diligence" on Mr Wallis, who gave him assurances there was nothing in his past that could embarrass the force.
1339:
Labour MP David Winnick suggests Mr Fedorcio should have asked Mr Wallis, as a former NoW deputy editor, what he knew about phone hacking
1339:
In September 2009 - Mr Wallis was given the job, eight months after John Yates completed his review of the original phone hacking investigation.
 
1338: Mouth Word
tweets: I want to know who recommended Wallis to Fedorcio. #notw #hactee #hacking #murdoch #ffe #etc
 
1338: Laura Kuenssberg
tweets: Will Lewis + Simon Greenberg from News int both leaving jobs to work full time on cleaning things up at the company
1336:
Mr Fedorcio says he saw Mr Wallis - who he had known since 1997 as a "business colleague" - Mr Vaz suggests a better phrase should be a "professional colleague". Mr Fedorcio agrees - but he says he was not a personal friend.
1335:
Mr Fedorcio tells the committee he needed someone with the right experience and knowledge - and decided he needed a "retainer contract" - with access to an adviser "if or when I needed to get advice". Mr Wallis's name was put forward - but he can't remember who suggested it.
 
1334: Jack W from Surrey
e-mails: Now that the instances of hacking have been widely verified, surely the question that needs to be asked is; Why did the initial investigations miss so much? Was it a lack of thoroughness, or was information buried by people within the Met?
1333:
Mr Vaz presses his question - why Mr Wallis? Mr Fedorcio says he had need for external advice and support because his deputy was recovering from a serious illness. There was great pressure and he needed help - the commissioner advised him to get some help.
1332:
Mr Fedorcio says he wants to be "open and helpful" but he has been referred to the independent police complaints commission and has not had time to take legal advice. Mr Vaz says all the committee's witnesses have been referred to the IPCC - and it had not held back Sir Paul Stephenson.
1331:
Next up before the committee is Dick Fedorcio, the Met's Director of Public Affairs - which among other things runs the force's media operation. Why did he employ Mr Wallis, Keith Vaz asks.
 
1330: BBC's Dominic Casciani
tweets: Stephenson's final thought: I'm not leaving because I was pushed or because I have anything to fear. I'm leaving because I'm a leader.

No comments:

Post a Comment