Pages

Monday, January 17, 2011

John Boehner's


Priorities of the People: Repealing ObamaCare Critical to Creating Jobs, Growing Economy
Posted by Don Seymour on January 16, 2011

The House will return to the people's business this week, holding a vote to repeal ObamaCare and taking the first steps toward replacing it with common-sense reforms that will lower health care costs and protect jobs -- as outlined in the Pledge to America.  Repealing the job-crushing health care law is critical to boosting small business job creation and growing the economy.  For example, repealing ObamaCare will:
  • Eliminate the law's maze of job-destroying taxes, penalties, and mandates – including more than $770 billion in tax hikes and the costly “1099 mandate” that Speaker Boehner pointed out “requires small businesses to report any total purchases that run more than $600" – that impose new costs on job creators and hurt economic growth. Analysis by the Heritage Foundation concludes that "The best way to prevent further erosion of the economy is to repeal the new law";
  • Cut more than $540 billion in government spending. President Obama and Congressional Democrats have been on a job-crushing spending spree that has left us with nothing but historic unemployment and the most debt in U.S. history.  Former Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin says repealing the health care law is “a first step toward fiscal sanity”; and
  • Pave the way for Congress to pass common-sense reforms that will lower costs and protect jobs without imposing unconstitutional mandates or kicking people out of coverage they like.
Lawmakers who oppose repealing ObamaCare will be voting to keep in place a health care law - written behind closed doors in then-Speaker Pelosi's office and opposed by the American people - that will:
  • Destroy American jobs.  A CBO report says ObamaCare "will reduce the amount of labor used in the economy by … roughly half a percent" -- meaning hundreds of thousands of jobs lost.  The Heritage Foundation pegs it at around "670,000 lost job opportunities per year." The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) says the law will wreak havoc on small businesses and that "more than 90 percent of them favor repeal ..." The CBO also concluded that ObamaCare would “increase gross federal debt" -- and more debt means fewer jobs;
  • Increase health care costs.   ObamaCare means higher health care costs all around -- overall spending on health care will increase by more than $310 billion according to Medicare’s chief actuary. For families, CBO analysis found that premiums on individual health care policies would rise by 10 to 13 percent more under ObamaCare than they would have otherwise.  In fact, the Wall Street Journal reported that health insurers plan to "raise premiums for some Americans as a direct result of the health overhaul";
  • Force people out of coverage they like.  Republicans on the House Ways & Means Committee found that by 2013 “87 million Americans (1 out of 2 Americans with employer coverage) will no longer be able to retain the health plan they have and like.” NFIB says the health care law makes it harder for small businesses "to 'keep what they’ve got,' driving them to absorb huge cost increases or, worse, being forced to buy even more expensive products." And CBO Director Doug Elmendorf says the law's dramatic cuts to Medicare - used to fund another unsustainable entitlement - would "reduce access to care or diminish the quality of care” for seniors.  The Washington Examiner reported that the "Medicare Advantage cuts will force 4.8 million seniors off the popular plan by 2019."
The House of Representatives will begin consideration of H.R. 2 - which would fully repeal ObamaCare - on Tuesday with a vote scheduled for Wednesday.  On Thursday the House will take up H. Res. 9 which will instruct several Congressional committees to report back with legislation for replacing ObamaCare.
House leaders postponed legislative activity last week out of respect to the victims of the tragic shooting in Arizona.  Upon returning to the people's business this week, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said:
“No act of violence is going to keep us from doing our jobs and representing the will of our constituents.  The American people have made it clear they want us to focus on cutting spending and removing barriers to job creation, and repealing the health care law is critical to fulfilling these priorities. The lawmakers, officials, and employees of the House have performed admirably in response to the tragedy in Arizona, and I know they will continue to do so as we return to the people’s business.”
Comments
The opinions expressed below are those of their respective authors and do not necessarily represent those of this office.
  • Linda Varvel commented on 1/17/2011
    I strongly supported President Obama Health Care Reform and continue to do so. It is a first step at an increasingly unworkable system. My Republican parents are already feeling the help with drug costs in the donut-hole period and are beginning to reconsider their positions in the past. What that says to me is the step-by-step change in what we need. If you truly intend to listen, you need to see the glass as half full rather than half empty. Obama has worked to gain consensus whereas so many Republicans and some Independents have distorted facts to get their way....no matter the costs. What I know no matter what you say the "American people" want is that most Americans DO care about the poor, the disadvantaged, and the aging population no matter how much money they have. And they also know that in such a severe economic crisis, if we hadn't spent federal dollars, you and the Tea Party and Democrats and Independents, bankers, lawyers, doctors, teachers, and politicians would not be where they are. You can't argue that Obama's spending and the nation's deficits are rash and irresponsible right after what has just happened in this country. Here's a parallel to think about: the way you portray "government" is the woman in this dynamic and your business-independent-"Don't Tread on Me" worship is the male in the equation. It's the same dynamic I've felt between the teaching profession and the general public. Women and teachers do the rescue, the daily, weekly, hourly love, guidance, support, and encouragement and then the "tough-minded, superior" world out there of mostly men and brassy women proclaim how irresponsible, unprofessional, and dangerous we are. It's YOU who need to do the listening and thinking, Speaker Boehner. Linda Varvel in Minneapolis
  • Xavier angeles commented on 1/17/2011
    Mr. Boehner. If people vote for Obama is because they want the health care program to exist. People of the US did not vote for republicans to try to change something already past and we all need. Please be focus on create jobs and not to destroy what we already have done.
  • erick d commented on 1/17/2011
    good article. Now, as for the federal semi-takeover of our aviation security,let's make it clear for once for all. I say that the TSA/DHS have been engaging on disrupting our industry by attacking passengers,pilots and their families and imposing privacy-disturbing screening procedures (ah,clothing and even private prosthesis removal) that are deemed to be almost unconstitutional. No other nation (for instance Israel, Chile, France or even United Kingdom) has its government take over port security,that duty is given to the private sector/airports. I hope everyone understands that the idea of having our government single-handedly secure our ports is just as costly as disruptive. Mr. Boehner and congress,the TSA owes america a heart-felt apology
  • Sean Sullivan commented on 1/17/2011
    Dear Speaker Boehner - Please clarify your interpretation of the CBO report further. As I understand it the CBO is basically saying the .5% of the labor force will decide that they can comfortably retire earlier due to the existing Healthcare law than before it went into effect. Are you saying it is a bad thing for this portion of the population to be able to retire earlier? Isn't it a good thing that people can retire before they die so they can enjoy a lifetime of hard work? The only people hurt by this reduced labor force seems to be businesses who will then have more pressure to compete for remaining workers, this raise wages and benefits. Again, this seems like a good thing for the workers of our country. Thanks for your clarification.

No comments:

Post a Comment