Pages

Tuesday, September 25, 2012


Chuck Todd Notes Obama’s ‘Weird’ Lack Of Meetings With Other Leaders, Contrasts His Schedule Against Bush’s



Tuesday’s Morning Joe panel focused on the President’s foreign policy, specifically the President’s recent characterization of events in the Middle East as a “bump in the road.” HostJoe Scarborough felt it was a mistake on the President’s part, particularly in light of the recent death of Ambassador Chris Stevens.
While the Washington Post‘s Eugene Robinson agreed that the President hadn’t used the best phrase given the gravity of the situation, he felt that the President had been trying to say that “at least we have policy right long term.”
Scarborough then turned to Chuck Todd to discuss “party hacks” and “sycophants” who had attacked him for criticizing Romney’s press conference Monday.
“It’s stunning,” he said, “how many people in the Romney campaign, at the very top of the Romney campaign, are going, ‘We’ve made a terrible mistake.’” That said, he noted that Obama’s approval numbers are declining. Todd quoted someone else who had sagely noted that “when American lives get lost, Americans tune into foreign policy.”
Todd also shared something interesting — according to George W. Bush‘s schedule in September of 2004, he had one-on-one bilateral meetings with a wide range of countries. “It’s weird” that Obama isn’t doing the same right now, Todd concluded… “and then you’re going on The View.” Scarborough added that Obama “doesn’t seem to want to” build relationships with foreign leaders.
Watch, courtesy of MSNBC:
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking newsworld news, and news about the economy

Ralph Reed Heads 'Back to the Future' With Voter Drive

Tuesday, 25 Sep 2012 08:00 AM
By Greg McDonald

Former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed is hoping to make a difference in this year's presidential race by launching an old fashioned voter registration drive aimed at turning out evangelical Christians in key battleground states.
Although Reed, now the chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, is distributing 51 million copies of what he calls a "nonpartisan voter guide" to help educate people about where the two candidates "stand on 10 key issues," his effort is clearly aimed at helping Mitt Romney much more than President Barack Obama.
"We've engaged in a massive voter registration effort," Reed told Fox News' Greta Van Susteren Monday, noting that his drive targets some 17 million evangelical Christians "who didn't bother to go to the polls four years ago when Barack Obama was elected."
He said about half of them weren't registered and the other half just didn't bother to vote.
"We're making sure that at a minimum they're registered, they're informed, they're educated," he said, adding that Faith and Freedom Coalition voter guide covers the candidates' positions — "90 percent in their own words" — on everything from the economy and jobs to marriage and abortion.
Reed is working from his own database of more than 17.1 million evangelicals, most of whom he said could be found in four states — Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia — considered crucial to winning the presidency.
According to recent polls, Obama now leads Romney in all four states. But Reed told Van Susteren he believes his voter drive will end up affecting the final outcome.
"In every one of those states, Greta, we believe we'll be able to increase the evangelical turnout from the 2008 baseline by an average of about seven percent," Reed said. "And when that happens, there's going to be a lot of shocked faces in a lot of newsrooms all across America."
Reed said he finds it "interesting," that "in the age of the Internet . . . and all this amazing technology," the race has basically come down to a draw with both sides running an ad "air war of mutual assured destruction" that's costing hundreds of millions of dollars.
"And what's going to decide the outcome of this election, left, right and center, among Republicans, Democrats, as well as independents, among voters of faith, and among all voters, is who knocks on more doors, who makes more phone calls, who burns more shoe leather, who rings more doorbells, and who gets more people to the polls," Reed said.
"I promise you that that is what will decide the outcome of the election. It's very counter intuitive, it's back to the future, but that's what this has all taken us back to."




An Evangelical Is Back From Exile, Lifting Romney


Chip Litherland for The New York Times
Ralph Reed, center, at a Tea Party event last year in Florida.



DULUTH, Ga. — Ralph Reed is clearly relishing his revival.
Just six years ago, the man who turned the Christian Coalition into such a powerful political force that he was called “God’s right-hand man” was all but written off, tarnished by his ties to the disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, then trounced in his campaign to become Georgia’s lieutenant governor.

But after several years in political purgatory, Mr. Reed has found his way back.
At the Republican convention in Tampa, Fla., he was sought after by party luminaries and afforded the ultimate status accommodation, a room in the same hotel as Mitt Romney. And soon he plans to unleash a sophisticated, microtargeted get-out-the-evangelical-vote operation that he believes could nudge open a margin of victory if Mr. Romney can keep the race close.
The other day, sitting in an office lined with framed photographs from back in the heyday — here with President George W. Bush at a White House Christmas party, there with Pope John Paul II at the Vatican — the preternaturally youthful evangelical operative, 51, propped his black ostrich cowboy boots on a coffee table and made what he admits seems an audacious prediction: that record numbers of socially conservative evangelical Protestants will turn out for the first presidential election in history without a Protestant on the Republican ticket.
“God,” he said with a laugh, “has a sense of humor.”
That may be, but Mr. Reed has a plan. And he has the money to back it up: an estimated $10 million to $12 million from contributors across the Republican spectrum, according to a partial list of donors and people with direct knowledge of his operation.
Three years ago, Mr. Reed formed the Faith and Freedom Coalition and began assembling what he calls the largest-ever database of reliably conservative religious voters. In the coming weeks, he says, each of those 17.1 million registered voters in 15 key states will receive three phone calls and at least three pieces of mail. Seven million of them will get e-mail and text messages. Two million will be visited by one of more than 5,000 volunteers. Over 25 million voter guides will be distributed in 117,000 churches.
White evangelicals are a crucial voting constituency, 26 percent of the 2008 electorate and overwhelmingly Republican in recent presidential cycles, exit polls show. With so few truly undecided voters left, bumping up evangelical turnout in swing states like Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio would almost certainly help Mr. Romney.
But the success of Mr. Reed’s turnout-stimulus campaign will hinge on a variety of factors, not least whether those voters so dislike some of President Obama’s policies that they can overcome their mistrust of Mr. Romney’s Mormon faith and reversals on issues like abortion. And in an election dominated by jobs and the economy, it remains an open question whether culture-war hot buttons, like the president’s support for same-sex marriage, will be as potent as in the past.
In 2004, Mr. Reed was an architect of an evangelical turnout apparatus that is credited with helping Mr. Bush win re-election. Then came the Abramoff influence-peddling scandal. Though Mr. Reed was not charged, the work his consulting firm did for Mr. Abramoff’s Indian gambling clients by opposing plans for rivals’ casinos sullied his reputation among Christian conservatives, many of whom oppose gambling. Mr. Reed acknowledges that he used bad judgment.
Clint Austin, a Christian lobbyist who used to work with Mr. Reed, said, “Money and power always find a way to get in the same room, and it’s sometimes hard to resist the allure of that. I want to say this with humility because I’m not his judge, but there were so many causes for concern, and a lot of us felt like he needed to step back and get himself refocused.
“And I think that’s what he’s now done.”
Mr. Reed began by aligning himself with Mr. Romney during the primary campaign against Senator John McCain, the eventual Republican nominee in 2008, said Mr. Reed’s friend Deal W. Hudson, president of the Pennsylvania Catholics Network. Mr. Reed distributed a film, “Amendment 6,” that linked the idea of religious tolerance to evangelicals’ acceptance of Mormonism.
“That movie was a great example of how Ralph works,” said Matt Towery, a Georgia political analyst. “I don’t mean this pejoratively, but he is an opportunist. He finds himself an opportunity and he hits it, and he hits it hard.”
With much of the work once done by party committees and campaigns now outsourced to “super PACs” and other outside groups, Mr. Reed saw another opportunity. In 2008, the Obama campaign won the turnout wars with technology and microtargeting data made available by the growth in online shopping.
The Faith and Freedom Coalition, formed in 2009, is Mr. Reed’s attempt to do the same on the right.
To identify religious voters most likely to vote Republican, the group used 171 data points.
It acquired megachurch membership lists. It mined public records for holders of hunting or boating licenses, and warranty surveys for people who answered yes to the question “Do you read the Bible?” It determined who had downloaded conservative-themed books, like “Going Rogue” by Sarah Palin, onto their e-readers, and whether those people also drove pickup trucks. It drilled down further, looking for married voters with children, preferably owners of homes worth more than $100,000.
Finally, names that overlapped at least a dozen or so data points were overlaid with voting records to yield a database with the addresses and, in many cases, e-mail addresses and cellphone numbers of the more than 17 million faith-centric registered voters — not just evangelical Protestants but also Mass-attending Catholics. The group is also reaching out to nearly two million more people who have never registered to vote.
One measure of the coalition’s potential influence is its contributors, who represent a broader Republican constituency than simply the religious right. The group is not required to disclose its donors, but a partial list was obtained by The New York Times.
For example, one donor, Bernard Marcus, the co-founder of Home Depot, supports abortion rights but wants smaller government. On the other hand, the mutual fund manager Foster Friess is a patron of religious conservative causes and was a leading donor to a super PAC that supported Rick Santorum. Another donor is John M. Templeton Jr., who runs a foundation devoted to pursuing “new insights at the boundary between theology and science.”
In addition to its presidential election turnout campaign, the group plans to focus on two state ballot measures: a proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in Minnesota and an effort to recall an Iowa Supreme Court justice who voted to legalize same-sex marriage in the state.
Mr. Reed and his allies agree that social issues alone will not turn the election.
Same-sex marriage, for instance, “doesn’t raise the temperature of the bulk of the Catholic Mass-going voters,” said Mr. Hudson, adding that while it was still a concern, “attitudes about homosexuals have changed so much over the last several years.”
So the group plans to pair its social message with a broader economic one. The president’shealth care overhaul will be depicted as both big government spending and an assault on religious liberty; the law mandates that employees of organizations affiliated with religions, like hospitals, universities and charities, be able to obtain free contraception through their health care plans.
In addition, Mr. Obama’s testy relations with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, an important issue for many evangelicals, will be highlighted, said Gary Marx, the Faith and Freedom Coalition’s executive director.
Some Republican operatives doubt Mr. Reed will be able to mobilize a new evangelical army.
Still, one early test was the coalition’s work in the 2009 Virginia governor’s race, where exit polls showed that evangelicals’ share of the electorate had jumped to 34 percent from 28 percent in 2008.
“Ralph’s organization played an incredibly important role,” said Phil Cox, the campaign manager for the Republican winner, Bob McDonnell. “He speaks the language.

Mitt Romney, Pres. Obama  Address Annual Clinton Global Initiative Meeting





NEW YORK CITY
Tuesday, September 25, 2012

President Obama and Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney addressed the 8th Annual Clinton Global Initiative Meeting in New York City on Tuesday. 

The Initiative brings together "world leaders in government, business, philanthropy, and civil society who gather each year to create and implement solutions to the world’s most pressing challenges."

President Obama and Governor Romney addressed separate sessions on the annual meeting's final day.  Mitt Romney spoke during the morning sessionand later President Obama addressed the afternoon session.

Former President Bill Clinton, who established the Global Initiative in 2005, introduces both President Obama and Mitt Romney.

Updated: 3 hr., 2 min. ago


1



Clinton (William J.) Foundation | Clinton Global Initiative

Mitt Romney spoke at the 8th annual Clinton Global Initiative meeting. He outlined his new foreign aid plan, "Prosperity Pacts." The program would create partnerships between the federal government and small- and medium-sized businesses to remove barriers to trade and investment in Middle East and developing nations. In exchange those countries would receive monetary assistance for institutions that promote individual freedoms and legal principles.
20 minutes | 376 Views




Romney At Clinton Global Initiative: I’m Waiting For That Bill Clinton ‘Bounce’


On Tuesday, Mitt Romney spoke at the Clinton Global Initiative, receiving a warm welcome from former President Bill Clinton. Taking the podium, Romney joked that he was waiting for his Clinton “bounce.”
In his introduction, Clinton spoke about the Americorps legislation he passed, noting that he used Romney’s program in Massachusetts as a model.
As Romney took his place behind the mic, he joked, “If there’s one thing we’ve learned this election, by the way, it is that a few words from Bill Clinton can do a man a lot of good.”
“All I gotta do now is wait a couple of days for that bounce to happen,” he added.
Romney’s speech at the CGI took place a few hours before the president gave his own speech at the conference.








Pres. Obama, Mitt Romney Address Annual Clinton Global Initiative Meeting





NEW YORK CITY
Tuesday, September 25, 2012

President Obama and Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney addressed the 8th Annual Clinton Global Initiative Meeting in New York City on Tuesday. 

The Initiative brings together "world leaders in government, business, philanthropy, and civil society who gather each year to create and implement solutions to the world’s most pressing challenges."

President Obama and Governor Romney addressed separate sessions on the annual meeting's final day.  Mitt Romney spoke during the morning sessionand later President Obama addressed the afternoon session.
Former President Bill Clinton, who established the Global Initiative in 2005, introduces both President Obama and Mitt Romney.

Updated: 3 hr., 2 min. ago




0

President Obama spoke at the 8th annual Clinton Global Initiative meeting. He talked about his administration's efforts to fight human trafficking.
28 minutes | 839 Views

Why your next 'Passw0rd' might not be a password



Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Text passwords are unsafe, fingerprints and retinas can be faked. So how do you make an unbreakable password? A Canadian inventor is developing a biometric monitor that fits inside a shoe that he says is unhackable. Doors open for you — and nobody else. Richard Lui and Bob Sullivan report on technology that will change digital security forever.
It's been a rough year for passwords.
The leaks also proved something experts had fretted about for a while: Passwords are very easy to guess. Analysts quickly compiled results from the list of passwords and  found that really dumb choices abounded. The most common phrase in the LinkedIn passwords, for example, was "link." Not far behind was "1234."First, 6.5 million LinkedIn passwords were leaked online. Soon after, millions of passwords from eHarmony and Yahoo users were published by hackers. These events exposed untold numbers of accounts to criminals, as many consumers use the same passwords across multiple accounts.  
It's quite possible that 2012 will be a turning point in the history of passwords; or rather, it may be the point that passwords become history.Despite years of warnings, the truth is incontrovertible -- mortal users do a very poor job of defending their data with passwords. To add insult to injury, a recent analysis of debit card PINs shows that 1 in 10 users pick "1234." And the "safest" PIN code, 8068, is no longer safe because it was published in the analysis.
For years, you've been hearing about space-aged authentication systems like retina scans and computers that recognize your voice. And yet, for the overwhelming majority of computer users and home and at work, simple user/password combinations are all that stands between their data and the bad guys.
This old-fashioned system has obvious limitations, the most evident being user memories.  Our brains are ill-suited to recall eight-digit combinations of letters, numbers and special characters that are recommended. Sticky notes with password lists taped to computer screens remain common.
Meanwhile, "Forgot your password?" is among the more popular links on websites, and among the more dangerous, as it often puts only your pet's name and your high school mascot -- easily determined from Facebook -- between your data and hackers.
There has to be a better way. And there is, if Carnegie-Mellon University and a small Canadian start-up firm are right. At the school's new "Biometrics Research and Identity Automation Lab," researchers are investigating whether the way people walk can be used as a simple yet secure way to affirm their identities.
“The continuing threats to military personnel and critical infrastructure and the growing national cybersecurity vulnerabilities demand a new breed of credentialing technology, and what our group has achieved certainly puts a whole new spin on things," said Todd Gray, president of Ottawa-based Autonomous ID, which is working with the university on the project. The system uses a "BioSole" inserted into shoes to assess a wearer’s gait, matching that distinctive pattern against an existing record to verify the person’s identity.
BioSoles are among dozens of new authentication systems vying for acceptance in a thriving industry that has gained momentum because of the recent troubles with passwords. Before we describe more of them, it's important to discuss the basics of authentication technologies and why new systems might succeed where others have failed. 
Security professionals often talk about "two-factor" authentication as a way of double-checking to see if a person logging into a system should be authorized. Traditionally, those two factors include "something you have" and "something you know." For example, a debit card is "something you have,” and a PIN code is “something you know.” For a criminal to hack your bank account, he or she must have both elements, which is a much harder challenge than simply stealing a password. 
Biometric passwords expand the possibilities into the "something you are" category. A retina scan or fingerprint, for example, authenticates users based on something they are, and, in most cases, cannot change. Biometrics have a decided advantage over passwords because they don’t rely on users’ ability to remember them -- you are who your retina says you are. There is a dramatic downside, however. Horror films have long exploited the plot line where a bad guy cuts out a target's eyeball and uses it to log into a computer or enter a secure facility.

Matt Rivera / NBC News
Facial pattern recognition maps are on display at Carnegie Mellon's CyLab.
The newest technologies retain the advantage of biometrics, but don't create the same level of physical risk. They involve "something you do," such as the way you walk, as being researched at Carnegie Mellon. Another similar tool involves quantifying the unique way users type, a technique that's been dubbed "keystroke analysis." These so-called "behavioral" authentication mechanisms give systems architects four distinct methods to choose from. 

Marty Jost, who works in Symantec Corp.'s authentication group, says he thinks behavioral techniques offer the most promise for next-generation "passwords."Another promising new behavioral technique takes advantage of a skill most video game players know well -- users learn behaviors that become automatic through play.  Later, they can recall these learned behaviors – they can recognize patterns, for example --  without having to think about them. Researchers at Stanford and Northwestern are working on a system that would "teach" users to recognize a pattern of dots in a puzzle-like picture, then have that puzzle serve as a password. As writer Devin Coldewey notes, the most secure password might be the one a user doesn’t have to remember.
"Biometrics have been around a long time, but have historically tended to be unreliable. Just when you need it most, your fingerprints are dirty and they don't read right, for example. That's what's held it back," he said. "The key to success is providing a second factor without making it difficult to use. When you try to use an exotic method, it becomes a different problem, such as a customer service problem or a user satisfaction problem."
Symantec is concentrating on behavioral techniques that don't require dramatic changes by sers. For a while, token-based authentication procedures were all the rage -- banks and corporations gave users small gadgets that provided temporary passwords to prove the person logging in satisfied the "something you have" requirement -- but users often misplaced them. So now, companies like Symantec are increasingly using cell phones as tokens. A simple text message or phone call sent to an employee’s phone serves as a second authenticating factor.
"Users are much less likely to lose their phones," Jost said.
Symantec also concentrates on back-end behavioral techniques, such as observing the kind of activities the user is attempting. A user who normally logs in from New York but suddenly appears to be logging in from Hong Kong is flagged for extra security challenges. Similarly, a user who usually transfers small dollar amounts from one account to another is flagged if her or she  suddenly requests a $10,000 transfer.
"Behavioral data over time develop a profile," he said. “We can analyze these patterns without having to involve the user.”
Jost is pessimistic about what he calls "exotic" login tools for mass audiences, because even a small failure rate can create a big problem for consumer brands.
"If you are a bank and you’ve done something exotic, if it’s not working for 1 percent of people, that's a lot of people,” he said. “We try to strike that balance between strength and usability. … We do things that make the activity safer for people without them necessary even knowing about it."
A user’s tolerance for taking extra security precautions depends on motivation. Some "exotic" methods are already in use today where circumstances encourage their use. In high-crime areas of Brazil, for example, "vein printing" machines that detect blood flow patterns in the palm of a user’s hand have been deployed. In the U.S., where ATM theft rates in the U.S. are not published by banks, the American Banking Association recently said that a successful ATM crime nets more than 10 times the cash as a traditional bank hold-up, and it hopes U.S. banks adopt one or more advanced ATM protection technologies. 
Meanwhile, facial- and voice-recognition systems like Samsung’s “Face Unlock,” and Apple’s Siri mean consumers are getting used to biometrics in their everyday mobile lives, and they might be more tolerant of similarly imperfect technologies at work and at home.
“I do think voice has a real shot now,” she said. “Who wants to carry around a token that might weigh more than your iPhone?”Avivah Litan, a security expert at the consulting firm Gartner, thinks that the move to mobile computing holds the key to the future of passwords.  As users perform more and more critical functions with their mobile device – such as mobile banking – authentication methods will have to change with the times. So-called “out-of-band” authentication techniques, like text messages sent to web users warning that their accounts have been accessed, are clumsy to use in concert with mobile banking. So Litan thinks that, finally, mobile users will tolerate a biometric technique that they are already very comfortable with – talking.
The big hurdle with voice printing is “enrollment,” or getting an initial clean version of a users’ voice that’s used for comparison purposes later. Techniques for mass enrollment are still under development, but cell phone carriers are in a unique position to do this easily when they sell new phones, Litan noted.
“It would be easy for them,” she said. “But there are plenty of other ways this could be accomplished.”
But despite the technological advances, the crime and all those leaked passwords, are passwords really on the way out?  Jost isn't so sure.
"I certainly think the awareness of the problem is rapidly growing," he said. "It's quite easy to guess (passwords) … and by using other types of systems you can overcome that problem. Is this a turning point or not? I'm not really sure. But I hope so. It is a problem that gets bigger and bigger."

World Leaders, Pres. Obama, Speak at UN General Assembly





NEW YORK, NY
Tuesday, September 25, 2012

President Obama delivered his fourth address to the United Nations General Assembly which is meeting this week in New York City. Leaders from all 193 member nations are invited to address the international governing body at the opening of its term.
The President opened by speaking about Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in Libya among regional unrest. He said "the events of the last two weeks are not simply an assault on America," but an assault on the ideals of the UN.
Here’s some noteworthy speeches coming up that will be part of our coverage: Tuesday, President Obama; Wednesday, Iranian President Ahmadinejad; and Friday, leadership from Libya.
We will being you these speeches and others throughout the week on C-SPAN and online at c-span.org.

Updated: 2 min. ago

Pres. Obama's 2011 Address to the UN General Assembly