Pages

Thursday, July 7, 2011

A Savvy Political Observer’s Guide to the Modern Campaign Fund-Raising Report

 



 There’s lots of spin out there concerning fund-raising numbers for GOP presidential candidates. Federal Election Commission filings are quarterly X-rays of campaign bank accounts, which political junkies pore over like treasure maps. And as the July 15 filing deadline looms, campaigns are leaking bits of information, trying to show early strength. You may hear a lot of bragging about organization and ads, but don’t be fooled: It’s often a campaign’s accountant who is the craftiest operator on the team.
Here’s what a savvy politico should look for in the modern FEC report:
Real cash: To get this number you take the reported cash on hand in primary dollars only, and subtract any reported debt. This is the number that really counts. Cash on hand is the muscle of a campaign. It’s key for buying ads and conducting voter contact. Early on, it’s important to look at the ratio between total raised and cash on hand (minus reported debt); that gives you a good idea of the campaign’s overhead costs and “burn rate” — how fast they’re going through the money they raise.
Remember to subtract the reported debt: Candidates sometimes run up some debt to make the cash number look artificially high at first glance. Campaign X might show $400,000 in the bank, and a debt of $220,000. That means campaign X is barely breathing, with only have $180,000 in real cash terms. It looks like Newt Gingrich’s campaign has more debt than cash on hand, which is a big problem.
General election dollars: One neat trick to pump up the overall cash raised number, which is what the media focuses on, is to raise money for the general election. These “general election” dollars pump up your total, but are not legal to use during the primary, making them nearly as useless as monopoly money for most candidates.
The “Magic Drawer”: Campaign managers often hide a few invoices, only to “discover” and pay them the day after the quarter ends. That way they avoid putting some expenditures on the report, either as money spent or as debt. It’s not exactly kosher accounting, but it’s an attractive way to show a little more cash in the campaign account. I’d subtract 4%-8% from the cash totals in these reports to get an accurate number. If the drawer gets too big or too cute, campaigns risk trouble with the Feds. Of course, no campaign ever admits to doing this.
Outside groups: Most campaigns plan to have outside “independent” groups support them in the primary. (Read: beat the tar out of their opponents on TV and in the mail.) Romney has raised millions for his outside group. It’s not yet clear if other candidates will do the same, but I’d bet yes.
Self-funding: Some candidates put in their own moolah. It’s almost always a popular move with the campaign staff and unpopular with the candidate and the spouse. Romney put in tens of millions in the 2008 cycle, but nothing so far this year. Jon Huntsman looks to be in for nearly $2 million, but we’ll have to see the final report to be sure.
Average contribution: Is the candidate’s average donor only 65 bucks, or $2000+? Small donors can give and give, but fundraising costs can be high. A balanced average contribution shows strength in both high- and low- dollar donor fund-raising.
Mike Murphy is a Republican consultant.

Obama puts Social Security, Medicare cuts on the table

By Reuters
Thursday, July 7th, 2011 -- 8:26 am


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - After weeks of impasse, President Barack Obama and top congressional leaders are aiming for "something big" as they resume budget talks on Thursday to avert an imminent default.
With Republicans showing new flexibility on taxes, Democrats say Obama will push negotiators to double their target to $4 trillion (2.5 trillion pounds) in budget savings over 10 years.
That would be an ambitious goal, but there have been a few hints of progress since talks hit a brick wall two weeks ago.
The meeting, which takes place at the White House, is due to start at 11 a.m. EDT (4 p.m. British time) and last about an hour.
Obama will propose cuts in Social Security and major reductions in Medicare, which mark a major shift for the White House, The Washington Post reported late on Wednesday, citing people in both parties with knowledge of the proposal.
In exchange, Obama would seek Republican support for increasing tax revenues, the Post reported.
Negotiators are trying to craft a deal that would allow lawmakers to say they are taking steps to keep the national debt under control even as they sign off on further borrowing.

Failure to raise the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling by August 2 could force the country to default on debt service and other obligations, a move that could push the country back into recession and send shock waves through financial markets across the globe.
A small team of U.S. Treasury officials are discussing options to stave off default if Congress fails to raise the debt limit by the August 2 deadline, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Senior officials, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, have repeatedly said there are no contingency plans if lawmakers do not give the U.S. government the authority to borrow more money.
But the sources said the Treasury was looking at a number of options, including whether the administration can delay payments to try and manage cash flows after August 2.
"SOMETHING BIG"
By the end of last week, lawmakers were weighing a scaled-back deal that would cover the country's borrowing needs in the short term but force Congress to confront the issue again in a few months, when the 2012 election season will make politically painful decisions even more difficult.
Obama dismissed that idea on Tuesday, two days after he met secretly with the top Republican in Washington, House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner.
"We've got a unique opportunity to do something big," he said at a news conference, where he invited top congressional leaders to Thursday's White House meeting.
Obama's goal of $4 trillion in savings matches the figure that budget experts say is needed to keep the debt at a sustainable level. It is not clear how he would get there when the two sides have had trouble reaching half of that goal.
Obama's proposal to restrain Social Security spending could include adjusting the measure of inflation used to determine payouts for the retirement program, the Post reported.
In earlier sessions, negotiators identified roughly $2 trillion in spending cuts that could form the basis of a deal. Republicans walked out of those talks after Democrats called for an additional $400 billion in budget savings by ending a range of tax breaks that benefit wealthy people and certain businesses, like the oil and gas industry.
On Wednesday, the two Republicans who were involved in those talks indicated that they could accept some "revenue raisers" in a deal.
Senator Jon Kyl, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, said his side had backed measures that would generate between $150 billion and $200 billion in new revenue generated by selling assets such as broadband spectrum and raising user fees.
His counterpart in the House, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, said Republicans could support ending some of the tax breaks that Democrats have proposed in return for tax cuts elsewhere.
Obama has proposed extending a payroll-tax cut that expires at the end of this year, which would add about $100 billion to budget deficits over the next 10 years. That cost could be offset by repealing tax breaks for ethanol producers, hedge-fund managers and oil and gas companies, or other elements Democrats have proposed.
"This would allow Democrats to get some tax hikes in the deal and extend the payroll tax cut, but Republicans could say they didn't vote for a net tax increase," analysts at International Strategy & Investment wrote in a research note.
Aside from Cantor and Kyl, the meeting will include Boehner, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi.
Democrats believe a deal needs to be in place by July 22 in order to ensure that Congress can raise the debt limit by August 2. Thursday's meeting could determine whether that is possible.
"We're going to have a really good indication by the end of this week, early next week as to whether they're actually bearing fruit or not," Republican Senator Bob Corker told Reuters Insider.
(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan, Rachelle Younglai, Tim Reid and Caren Bohan; Editing by Eric Beech)
Obama and lawmakers aim for "big" things in debt talks
Andy Sullivan
Reuters US Online Report Top News
Jul 07, 2011 07:53 EDT
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - After weeks of impasse, President Barack Obama and top congressional leaders are aiming for "something big" as they resume budget talks on Thursday to avert an imminent default.
With Republicans showing new flexibility on taxes, Democrats say Obama will push negotiators to double their target to $4 trillion (2.5 trillion pounds) in budget savings over 10 years.
That would be an ambitious goal, but there have been a few hints of progress since talks hit a brick wall two weeks ago.
The meeting, which takes place at the White House, is due to start at 11 a.m. EDT (4 p.m. British time) and last about an hour.
Obama will propose cuts in Social Security and major reductions in Medicare, which mark a major shift for the White House, The Washington Post reported late on Wednesday, citing people in both parties with knowledge of the proposal.
In exchange, Obama would seek Republican support for increasing tax revenues, the Post reported.
Negotiators are trying to craft a deal that would allow lawmakers to say they are taking steps to keep the national debt under control even as they sign off on further borrowing.
Failure to raise the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling by August 2 could force the country to default on debt service and other obligations, a move that could push the country back into recession and send shock waves through financial markets across the globe.
A small team of U.S. Treasury officials are discussing options to stave off default if Congress fails to raise the debt limit by the August 2 deadline, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Senior officials, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, have repeatedly said there are no contingency plans if lawmakers do not give the U.S. government the authority to borrow more money.
But the sources said the Treasury was looking at a number of options, including whether the administration can delay payments to try and manage cash flows after August 2.
"SOMETHING BIG"
By the end of last week, lawmakers were weighing a scaled-back deal that would cover the country's borrowing needs in the short term but force Congress to confront the issue again in a few months, when the 2012 election season will make politically painful decisions even more difficult.
Obama dismissed that idea on Tuesday, two days after he met secretly with the top Republican in Washington,House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner.
"We've got a unique opportunity to do something big," he said at a news conference, where he invited top congressional leaders to Thursday's White House meeting.
Obama's goal of $4 trillion in savings matches the figure that budget experts say is needed to keep the debt at a sustainable level. It is not clear how he would get there when the two sides have had trouble reaching half of that goal.
Obama's proposal to restrain Social Security spending could include adjusting the measure of inflation used to determine payouts for the retirement program, the Post reported.
In earlier sessions, negotiators identified roughly $2 trillion in spending cuts that could form the basis of a deal.Republicans walked out of those talks after Democrats called for an additional $400 billion in budget savings by ending a range of tax breaks that benefit wealthy people and certain businesses, like the oil and gas industry.
On Wednesday, the two Republicans who were involved in those talks indicated that they could accept some "revenue raisers" in a deal.
Senator Jon Kyl, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, said his side had backed measures that would generate between $150 billion and $200 billion in new revenue generated by selling assets such as broadband spectrum and raising user fees.
His counterpart in the House, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, said Republicans could support ending some of the tax breaks that Democrats have proposed in return for tax cuts elsewhere.
Obama has proposed extending a payroll-tax cut that expires at the end of this year, which would add about $100 billion to budget deficits over the next 10 years. That cost could be offset by repealing tax breaks for ethanol producers, hedge-fund managers and oil and gas companies, or other elements Democrats have proposed.
"This would allow Democrats to get some tax hikes in the deal and extend the payroll tax cut, but Republicans could say they didn't vote for a net tax increase," analysts at International Strategy & Investment wrote in a research note.
Aside from Cantor and Kyl, the meeting will include Boehner, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi.
Democrats believe a deal needs to be in place by July 22 in order to ensure that Congress can raise the debt limit by August 2. Thursday's meeting could determine whether that is possible.
"We're going to have a really good indication by the end of this week, early next week as to whether they're actually bearing fruit or not," Republican Senator Bob Corker told Reuters Insider.
(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan, Rachelle Younglai, Tim Reid and Caren Bohan; Editing by Eric Beech)

SpeakerBoehner NancyPelosi and the Dalai Lama on Capitol Hill

LukeRussert 5 hours 50 mins ago
@SpeakerBoehner @NancyPelosi and the Dalai #Lama on Capitol Hill http://yfrog.com/kl66eiij
ReplyTweet


66eii.jpg

#Jesus is on the Hill today


LukeRussert 8 hours 17 mins ago
#Jesus is on the Hill today. http://yfrog.com/klx5exj
 
 
x5ex.jpg

A birthday tribute to Nancy Reagan



  -  



Let me finish with a birthday tribute to an American who made a difference.
Her name is Nancy Reagan. She was our country's First Lady during the 1980s and supported one of the major American presidents in our country's history.
Now what I have to say about Reagan is not what many conservatives would say, but it is, I would argue, extremely important.
He saw the opportunity to end the Cold War and took it. He had the sound human sense to know he'd come across someone different in Moscow, a man, Mikhail Gorbachev, who was ready to do what had to be done - open up that system - and let the chips fall where they may, end the crazed competition in weaponry that had put both countries at each other - posed to shoot off every nuclear weapon in their arsenal. 
Ronald Reagan, whatever else, saw the horror and ultimate stupidity of mutual assured destruction and took the historic steps to call it off.  He and Gorbachev did that and it might not have happened had two lesser people been there - people without an historic sense, people who saw something higher involved that simply - literally - sticking to their guns.
Nancy Reagan, I am convinced by all my hunches, played a huge role in all this - this decision to "make" the decision - this readiness to take on history and change it - to make the deal that ended the longest and scariest war in our history - the Cold War.
Since she lost her husband, Mrs. Reagan has been every bit as good working for the positive role that science can play in human history - working for stem cell research - and for government support for it. She's taken some heat but has kept on coming.  
I don't know all that went on between the Reagans when he was president.  But instinct and experience teaches me that it was Nancy Reagan who provided the moderating influence - who kept him from a harsh direction on social issues, who honored her own tolerance, even accepting views.  I believe that, and on this issue, "I'm" the one sticking to my guns.
So, again, Happy Birthday, Nancy. I once called you a "babe" on TV. Here goes again. Happy Birthday, Babe. 

How Bad is Exxon's Montana Mess?

It turns out Exxon Mobil took nearly twice as long as they'd earlier revealed to fully seal a pipeline that leaked roughly 1,000 barrels of crude oil into Montana's Yellowstone River. Keith talks with Countdown Contributor andMother Jones writer Kate Sheppard to discuss how this could happen so soon after the BP spill... and who deserves a sticky coat of shame.



Keith Olbermann
July 6, 2011 at 4:01 pm