Pages

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Santorum Story Time Line from 02/07 - 02/08/2012


This time line if from yesterday morning until 1:00 am this morning. I could not possibly cover all the stories, so I did a time line with links to all articles.

1:08 AM – Today
Santorum Making Several Media Appearances Following Big Night
@ RickSantorum : My morning media schedule: CNN - 6:30am CST; @FoxandFriends - 7am CST; @MorningJoe - 7:10am CST #Decision2012
 
1:07 AM – Today
Santorum Swept The Floor With Mitt
@ cschweitz : To call tonight an embarrassment for @MittRomney is literally an understatement. @RickSantorum just swept the floor with Mitt as the broom.
 
1:01 AM – Today
Rick Santorum Projected Winner In Colorado
Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum was projected the winner of the Colorado caucus by the state's GOP chair on CNN.
 
0:37 AM – Today
Santorum's Team Celebrating
@ Philip_Elliott : Santorum aide to bartender: "Do you have champagne?" The answer? Nope. He instead takes wine up to the senator's suite. #2012
 
0:31 AM – Today
Writing On The Wall Foreshadows Santorum in Colorado
@ Redistrict : Writing on the Red Rocks wall in CO...Santorum sweeps all 3 contests tonight.
11:42 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Backtracks On Claim That Romney Would Lose To Obama
In a Fox News interview shortly after his Missouri and Minnesota caucus wins, Rick Santorum backed off an earlier claim he'd made that the Republican Party would lose the presidential campaign if it nominates Mitt Romney.
"I probably got a little wound up there on the stump," said the former senator from Pennsylvania. "I just think we have a much higher probability of losing, so I will backtrack on that ..."
-- Sam Stein
11:27 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Super PAC Backer Gets Cozy With Candidate

Standing right behind Rick Santorum (over his right shoulder) as he gave his victory speech in Missouri Tuesday night was Foster Freiss, the main financial backer of his super PAC.
Friess is a wealthy businessman and a bankroller of many conservative causes. His donations to the Red White And Blue super PAC have, more or less, given it the money needed to run the few ads it's aired. Among those ads include spots attacking Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich in Minnesota, another state Santorum won on Tuesday.
The campaign and the super PAC cannot legally coordinate. And it stands to reason that, legally speaking, having Friess next to Santorum on stage doesn't violate that rule. Santorum, after all, wasn't talking to Friess directly, nor was he speaking explicitly about campaign strategy.
But the proximity of the donor to the candidate on Tuesday night is a wonderful illustration of the dangers of the new campaign finance system: where big checks don't just get you a seat at the table, they get you a spot on the stage.
-- Sam Stein

11:04 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Mocks Newt
@ jonward11 : Santorum just mocked Gingrich's "my life, fortune and honor" line

10:56 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum: 'We Doubled Them Up'
Rick Santorum spoke with voters after it was projected he won both the Missouri primary and the Minnesota caucus.
"Conservatism is alive and well in Missouri and Minnesota," Santorum said, speaking from Missouri. "We doubled them up here and in Minnesota."
Santorum took a shot at Romney, saying his wins in the two early states were likely heard in Massachusetts. But he didn't stay focused on his GOP rival -- instead, he used his speech to hit President Obama, who he said never listened to the people of America.
"Another person listening to your cheers tonight's at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue," Santorum said. "He thinks he knows better. He thinks he's smarter than you. He thinks he's someone who's a privileged person who should be able to rule over all of you."
"I don't stand here to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney," Santorum said. "I stand here to be the conservative alternative to Obama."
Santorum did sneak in one subtle hit at Romney when he claimed he cares about "the very rich and the very poor," spinning Romneys statement that he doesn't "care about poor people."
"I care about 100 percent of America," Santorum said.
During the speech, Santorum also thanked his supporters and claimed his wins tonight were victories for "the voices of our party, conservatives and tea party people." He even had a shout out for his daughter Bella, who was hospitalized just before the Florida primary.
"Thank you so much for getting healthy," Santorum said.
-- Paige Lavender

 10:29 PM – 02/07/2012
'We Picked Rick! We Picked... No?'
@ AKaczynski1 : The announcer at the Santorum event just started chanting "We picked Rick," repeatedly and no one chanted along.

 10:25 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Doing Well Early On In Colorado
@ danielpetty : Santorum doing well in early Colo. returns. RT @Johnschroyer: One woman said about Santorum, "He feels like us to me." #copolitics #cocaucus


10:25 PM – 02/07/2012
One More Left
@ shushwalshe : ABC News projects Rick Santorum as the winner of the Minnesota caucuses. He has now won both Missouri + Minn. Just CO left.


.
10:17 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Projected Winner Of Minnesota
Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum is the projected winner of the Minnesota caucus according to NBC News.


10:00 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Win More Symbolic Than Strategic
@ howardfineman : Santorum wins are more symbolic than strategic but the symbolism is bad for Romney: ie, he remains the weakest frontrunner in decades.

9:56 PM – 02/07/2012
Meanwhile, In Minnesota...
@ mpoindc : Meanwhile in Minnesota, 13% of caucus results are in. So far it's Santorum 43, Paul 27, Romney 17, Gingrich 12. Still early.

9:53 PM – 02/07/2012
No Delegates For Santorum
@ daveweigel : Weird. CNN running with BREAKING NEWS that Santorum won MO, but not adding to delegate count. Oh: That's because he didn't win delegates.


9:52 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum 'Blown Away'
@ michaelpfalcone : Return on investment RT @shushwalshe: A beaming @FosterFriess is here at Santorum's party, said he's "blown away"

9:44 PM – 02/07/2012
ABC News Projects Romney 2nd, Paul 3rd
@ michaelpfalcone : ABC News projects Rick Santorum will win Missouri. Romney will be 2nd, Ron Paul 3rd.
 
9:38 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Projected Winner In Missouri
Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum is the projected winner of the Missouri primary according to NBC News.


9:31 PM – 02/07/2012
The Real Impact For Santorum Tonight
@ murphymike : No delegates, but wins tonight will give Santo a bounce to get money and attention, heading to AZ on 2/28 which could be a real battle.


9:21 PM – 02/07/2012
As It Stands Right Now...
@ TolbertReport : Might not last long but right now Santorum in leading in MO, MN, and CO
 
9:03 PM – 02/07/2012
Howard Fineman On Last Word
@ howardfineman : That is -- Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell on MSNBC at 10 pm re Minn-Mo-Colo results. A Santorum semi-surge?

7:48 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum: 9th Circuit Is 'Rogue'
@ ethanklapper : In a statement, Santorum calls the 9th Circuit a "rogue circuit."

7:07 PM – 02/07/2012
Contraception Issue Heats Up As Santorum Makes Headway
CBS News' Sarah Huisenga reports:
As GOP front-runner Mitt Romney stepped up his attacks on the Obama administration over the thorny issue of contraceptives and the Catholic Church, Newt Gingrich took on the former Massachusetts governor for enforcing a similar policy during his time in office.
Click here to read more.


6:33 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Ties Romney to ‘Contraception Services’
ABC News' Shushannah Walshe reports:
Rick Santorum went after Mitt Romney at an election day rally here, accusing the GOP front-runner of forcing the Catholic church in Massachusetts to provide emergency contraception to rape victims.
Click here to read more.


6:25 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Speaks Out On Prop 8 Ruling
@ RickSantorum : 7M Californians had their rights stripped away today by activist 9th Circuit judges. As president I will work to protect marriage.

6:02 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Seeks Second Wind
MSNBC's Michael O'Brien reports:
Rick Santorum could end up revitalizing his campaign Tuesday evening if he's able to upset Mitt Romney in a trio of nominating contests. Republicans in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri will each gather to express their choice in a presidential candidate. The results aren't binding on the ultimate allotment of delegates awarded to each candidate, but that hasn't stopped the four remaining Republican hopefuls from campaigning in the states.
Click here to read more.
5:59 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Taking Missouri Primary Very Seriously
KPLR11's Dan Gray reports:
One of the republican presidential candidates will be in the St. Louis area Tuesday as results from Tuesday's Missouri primary are counted. Republican Rick Santorum is taking the Missouri primary seriously although this vote amounts to a glorified opinion poll.
Click here to read more.

5:50 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Hits Obama For "Phony Job Numbers"
Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich both argued on Tuesday that the current unemployment rate of 8.3 percent, and the downward trend in the rate, is a misleading snapshot of the state of the economy.
Santorum, speaking at a rally in Blaine, Minn., went so far as to call the unemployment statistics released last Friday "phony job numbers," echoing the language used last week by Jim Pethokoukis, a prominent conservative economic blogger at the American Enterprise Institute.
"I realize, just from basic math, that you can actually lower percentages by reducing the denominator -- the fewer workers that are out there working -- instead of just increasing the numerator. That's pretty much what the Obama administration is doing," Santorum said. "They've had such a bad economy that we're at a 30-year low of people participating in the marketplace as workers."
"This unemployment number of 8.3 percent is a hollow number," Santorum said. "And the bottom line is a lot of people are hurting and even more than you can see from the statistics that the president would like to talk about."
Gingrich, at a speech in Dayton, Ohio, also said that President Obama is getting credit for a recovery that is not happening.
"The president has been taking credit for the drop in unemployment. And I don't think anybody on his staff has quite explained it to him. You see, you see, the difference, the unemployment rate is a function of the number of people looking for work. So if you actually ask how many people are out of work, it's somewhere between 15 and 20 percent, but if you ask the number left who are still looking for work, it's only 8.3 percent," Gingrich said.
"And the difference is that Barack Obama has led to the largest decline in work force participation in American history," Gingrich said.
Gingrich then went on a semi-comedic riff that illustrates why his rhetorical skills have energized the grassroots, something Santorum has struggled to do in the same way.
"At this rate, if [Obama] could convince everybody still looking to quit looking, we'd have zero unemployment because we'd have lots of unemployed but it wouldn't count as unemployment," Gingrich said. "Therefore he'd be really doing well because everybody would be sitting at home getting their food stamps being passive instead of being out looking for work. Think how terrific that would be."
- Jon Ward

5:44 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Confident About Minnesota
Politico's Juana Summers reports:
Making his final appearance in Minnesota – a state he appears poised to win – Santorum gave a confident speech to Republicans in Blaine. "I feel great that Minnesota is going to change the direction of this race tonight," he told supporters here.
Click here to read more.

5:39 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum: 'Don't Settle'
@ Stowydad : "Don't settle for second best," is message Santorum left voters in Blaine, MN

4:58 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Hits Rivals On Global Warming
@ AKaczynski1 : Rick Santorum hitting Newt/Romney: "both of them have the supported the prevision and politicalization of science called global warming."
@ jonward11 : Santorum: "Romney's been able to bully his way through this primary, outspending his opponents by about 5 to 1 … but he's not inspiring."

4:55 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Blasts Romney's 'Disaster'
@ AKaczynski1 : Rick Santorum in Minnesota calls RomneyCare a "disaster for Massachusetts."

4:12 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Hits At 'Romney Attack Machine' In a Tuesday email to supporters, Rick Santorum claimed Romney's "attack machine" had fired at the former Pennsylvania senator:
You’ve probably seen all over Fox News and on the web today that Rick Santorum is surging in key primary and caucus states. According to two polls just out, Rick has now moved ahead of Mitt Romney in Minnesota and Missouri. And the Romney argument that he is the strongest Republican to defeat Obama was shattered over the weekend with the release of a new Rasmussen survey that revealed that only one Republican Presidential candidate would beat Obama if the election were today…Rick Santorum.
Clearly this news has Romney very worried because today he aimed his well -funded attack machine squarely at Rick Santorum, firing relentless amounts of mud and inaccuracies. Romney even joined the attacks personally.
Why would Romney attack so aggressively? For two reasons. First, he sees Rick rising in the polls. And second, Romney knows he can’t run on his own record of supporting big government healthcare mandates, supporting radical environmental positions like Cap and Trade, and supporting the biggest earmark in American history…the Wall Street bailouts.
What Romney doesn’t know is that we have a secret weapon to fight against his attack machine. It’s thousands of people just like yourself who understand that we need a Presidential nominee who doesn’t just talk a good conservative game, but lives it every day.

4:00 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum: I've Never Believed In The 'Hoax Of Global Warming'
HuffPost reports:
GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum targeted primary rivals Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich on Tuesday for allegedly buying into the "bogus" science of man-made climate change, while proudly declaring that he himself had never believed in the "hoax of global warming.
Click here to read more.

1:17 PM – 02/07/2012
Will Rick Santorum Find New Life In Minnesota?
Patch.com's Mike Schoemer reports:
According to the latest Public Policy Polling conducted here, tonight's Minnesota Caucus could be one of three states to tip the way of former Sen. Rick Santorum in the race for the Republican presidential nomination. According to the latest PPP numbers, Santorum holds a "small advantage with 33 perecent to 24 percent for Romney, 22 percent for Newt Gingrich, and 20 percent for Ron Paul."
Click here to read more.

12:24 PM – 02/07/2012
Santorum: I Never Believed 'Hoax'
Politico's Juana Summers reports:
"Speaker Gingrich has supported cap and trade for more than a dozen years. Now, he wants business incentives to go along with cap and trade, but he supported cap and trade, and sat on the couch with Nancy Pelosi and said that global warming had to be addressed by Congress," Santorum said. "Who is he or who's Governor Romney to be able to go after President Obama? I've never supported even the hoax of global warming."
Click here to read more.

10:41 AM – 02/07/2012
Santorum: 'You Know, Mr. President, We’re Not That Stupid'
ABC News reports:
Rick Santorum laid down the gauntlet here, pledging to campaign every day on the controversial regulation by the Department of Health and Human Services requiring Catholic hospitals and universities to provide contraception and the morning after pill if the Obama administration does not change its stance. He said the administration has been “hostile to people of faith, particularly Christians and specifically Catholics.”
“That’s just a bunch of poppycock,” Santorum said in response to news that the White House said today it is working with religious institutions on the policy. “That’s just ridiculous. You know, Mr. President, we’re not that stupid."
Click here to read more.

10:39 AM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Attracting Voters Romney Is Losing The L.A. Times' David Horsey reports:
Is Mitt Romney the Republicans' man of destiny or will Rick Santorum finally get his moment in the sun? You remember Rick Santorum, the guy who, in last summer’s Republican debates, was placed at the end of the row near the exit sign and never got asked any questions because Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain were so much more weirdly entertaining. Well, Santorum campaign staffers are playing up recent polls that suggest their candidate could beat President Obama.
Click here to read more

10:19 AM – 02/07/2012
Is This Santorum's Day?
The Wall Street Journal reports:
Today marks the first multi-state voting in the 2012 election cycle when Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri – all swing states – hold presidential contests. The contests could provide momentum as the campaigns head toward Super Tuesday in early March. Former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum is favored to win Missouri and Minnesota, indicated by recent polling and by just how he has become the target of attacks over the last 24 hours by Mitt Romney’s camp.
Click here to read more.



9:59 AM – 02/07/2012
Mormon Voters Talk Romney
The New York Times' Ashley Parker reports:
Elizabeth Young, a mother and artist in Las Vegas, likes Mitt Romney’s successful record of “turning around companies that have been doing so poorly.” Chad Backus, a physical therapist from Winnemucca, Nev., appreciates his “business experience, his leadership experience.” And Arwen Spor, a mother of three in Spring Creek, Nev., lived in the Salt Lake City area during the 2002 Olympics, and trusts Mr. Romney because of his role in reviving the struggling games.
Click here to read more.


9:41 AM – 02/07/2012
Santorum's 'Key State' Won't Matter
HuffPost reports:
Rick Santorum has campaigned hard in Missouri, calling it a "key state" in the Republican nomination fight. With Newt GIngrich not even on the ballot, Santorum is hoping to use the contest to underscore his argument that he is the candidate best equipped to take Mitt Romney on head-to-head. Indeed, recent polls place him well ahead of Mitt Romney in Tuesday's primary. Unfortunately for Santorum, none of this matters in the delegate count.
Click here to read more.

8:42 AM – 02/07/2012
Santorum's Last Stand?
HuffPost's Howard Fineman reports:
His aides say otherwise, but this essentially is decision week for Rick Santorum. His hope of staying at all relevant in the GOP presidential race rests on winning one or more of Tuesday's primaries, and on somehow causing a sensation at this weekend's meeting of conservatives in Washington. If he can't manage to do either of those things, it's hard to see how he continues -- even though, his aides insist, he is running a lean campaign with a low "burn rate" and a decent amount of cash on hand.
So far, the high point of the former senator's campaign has been Iowa, where he spent two years scratching and crawling his way to what turned out to be a 34-vote, recounted victory.
But the dogged (if not delusional) Pennsylvania Republican shows no signs of quitting -- and he is poised to make a brief semi-return to the limelight tonight with credible showings in three states: Minnesota and Colorado (which are holding caucuses) and Missouri, which is holding a non-binding "beauty pageant" primary.
The reality is that he needs to win at least one of them, preferably one with real votes at stake. The best chance for that is Minnesota, where he is leading in at least one poll.
Click here to read more.


8:39 AM – 02/07/2012
Santorum Surprise? HuffPost's Mark Blumenthal reports:
On Tuesday, Republicans will attend precinct caucuses in Minnesota and Colorado and vote in a non-binding primary in Missouri. Polling for these contests has been extremely sparse, and may be just a rough guide to the outcome, but the available data suggests that Rick Santorum may have a strong showing in the two Midwestern states. What a difference a few weeks make. In the week before the Iowa caucuses in early January, public pollsters released ten separate surveys measuring the preferences of likely caucus-goers. Just before the primaries in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida in January, pollsters released 15 to 20 surveys in the last week alone.
But Saturday's Nevada caucuses produced just two public polls, and just one organization so far has released surveys on the upcoming contests this week: The Democratic Party-affiliated firm Public Policy Polling (PPP).

February 7 Primary Results: Live Updates From Minnesota, Missouri & Colorado


First Posted: 02/ 7/2012 7:59 pm Updated: 02/ 7/2012 11:46 pm


The Minnesota caucus, Colorado caucus and Missouri primary drew voters to the polls on Tuesday to have their voices heard in the race for the Republican presidential nomination.

Rick Santorum was projected the winner of Missouri's primary by NBC News. Mitt Romney was projected to finish second with Ron Paul in third. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich did not qualify to appear on the state's ballot.
Shortly after the results came in for Missouri's primary, Santorum was projected to finish in first place in Minnesota. ABC News projected Ron Paul to finish in second place in the North Star state.
HuffPost's Mark Blumenthal reports:
The Missouri primary [was] a "beauty contest" vote. Although the precinct caucuses in Colorado and Minnesota [began] the process of selecting delegates to the national Republican convention, that process has no formal connection to the "straw votes" ... held at the precinct meetings in each state. So technically, the votes in the two caucus states [being] reported on Tuesday are also non-binding.
(Click here to check out HuffPost's maps for results in each state, which will update with real-time data as the numbers come in.)
Check out the live blog below for the latest developments out of Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado.

live blog

Oldest Newest
2:44 AM – Today
What Santorum Wins Tonight
Rick Santorum and his campaign had a very good night Tuesday. Or, if you prefer, Mitt Romney had a very bad night. Romney's loss of the Missouri "beauty contest" primary was no big deal in the larger scheme of things. Losing Minnesota, on the other hand, was worse. And losing Colorado was a disaster.
Like a lot of people, I figured that Romney would use results in Nevada, Colorado and Michigan to bridge the gap between the early primaries and Super Tuesday. It didn't happen.
So the Santorum camp is cheered by tonight's results. But it's very possible to overstate Santorum's gains. At the end of the night, he added no delegates to his tally: All of these contests were nonbinding. So all of Santorum's achievements tonight were of the more ephemeral variety. This is not to say they aren't significant. To my mind, here's what Santorum gets out of the night.
1. A rationale to carry on in the race
Back when South Carolina was wrapping up its primary, the Santorum campaign could bear the loss by saying, "Three contests, three winners." But with a third-place finish in Florida and a fourth-place finish in Nevada, Santorum was teetering close to the edge of the map, and Newt Gingrich was renewing his call for get him to quit the race. Tonight's results prove that Gingrich's demands were premature. In fact, now it's Gingrich that doesn't look like he has a sound rationale to continue. (Gingrich, of course, is well beyond "sound rationales" by now.)
2. A new "electability" argument
Santorum can take tonight's victories and couple them with recent poll fluctuations to make an argument that he is now the candidate that can beat Barack Obama in November. It's an admittedly thin case, but you can expect him to make it. Begin with the fact that Santorum's central argument is that he can cut a starker contrast with Obama than can Romney and Gingrich for a number of reasons -- the fact that both have supported all or parts of what became "Obamacare" being the pre-eminent one.
Next, you can expect Santorum to point to the most recent Rasmussen poll, which came back with a surprising result: The survey said that Santorum was the only GOP candidate that would prevail over Obama, by a 45-to-44 margin. Romney, the poll found, would lose 47 to 43.
Now, I'd call that Rasmussen result an outlier, but that won't stop Santorum from hyping it. And he'll likely make a big deal about the Washington Post/ABC poll that suggested Romney would lose a head-to-head matchup with Obama by a 51-to-45 margin.
Why shouldn't he? The Romney campaign has positively flipped out over that result, mounting a frenzied pushback that's honestly pretty outsized for a February head-to-head poll result.
Why would you freak out over that sort of poll result? I'm guessing that it's because it undermines your electability argument at the worst possible time.
3. 'Momentum'
You know, whatever "momentum" is. Chances are, we'll be able to measure momentum in the number of news stories about Santorum that come out between now and Sunday morning. There should be quite a lot -- and it will be nice to get credit for a win the day after, rather then three weeks after it would have mattered, as was the case with Santorum's Iowa win.
The political media were prepping a "Santorum surge" narrative even before the evening began -- and that was well before anyone realized that Romney was going to lose Colorado. The double-edged sword here, of course, is that the moment the media start taking you seriously is the moment that scrutiny of your record intensifies.
4. Romney gets put in a bind.
We'll get more stories about his inability to "close the deal." We'll hear about how he badly underperformed tonight, as compared with his 2008 results. And it will be interesting to see if Romney is forced to re-engage.
In the past three weeks, Mitt's been crated up, lashed to the roof of the car and driven from stump speech to stump speech. According to the Washington Post, it's been three weeks since he's taken a question from a voter. And he's been kept away from the media as well.
There's a good reason why that is: "the more they learn about Mitt Romney, the less they like him."
So those are some nice short-term advantages for Santorum. In the long run, however, it won't matter much unless the wins add to his war chest, earn him endorsements and allow his campaign to build out its ability to compete across the nation. Mostly, Santorum needs cash, because right now, cash rules everything around Mitt Romney.
And if Santorum's Colorado win has Team Romney reaching for the panic button, remember what happens when that gets pressed: It unleashes an unholy deluge of attack ads across the full spectrum of human consciousness.
By and large, Romney held his powder in the states where tonight's competitions were held. That's going to be cited as the reason Romney faltered tonight, and so that's going to change. (Santorum could also really benefit from Gingrich dropping out; he and Newt will probably go halfsies on the non-Paul Not Romney votes in Arizona. But Newt's staying in.)
-- Jason Linkins

Live Election Results 2012

Missouri Primary

100% precincts reporting
Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
SantorumSantorum
138,957 55.2%
RomneyRomney
63,826 25.3%
PaulPaul
30,641 12.2%
OthersOthers
18,444 7.3%

Minnesota Caucus

98.9% precincts reporting
Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
SantorumSantorum
21,908 45.0% 37
PaulPaul
13,185 27.1%
RomneyRomney
8,207 16.9%
GingrichGingrich
5,254 10.8%
OthersOthers
141 0.3%

Colorado Caucus

100% precincts reporting
Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
SantorumSantorum
26,614 40.3% 15
RomneyRomney
23,012 34.9% 6
GingrichGingrich
8,445 12.8%
PaulPaul
7,759 11.8%
OthersOthers
197 0.3%
Election Dashboard 2012

Who’s Ahead


     Romney Gingrich Santorum
Delegates        107 32 69
Fundraising          $57 M $13 M $2.2 M
Intrade        $8.09 $0.34 $0.99
Twitter        330 K 1.4 M 110 K
 

Barack Obama's Super PAC Support Materialized As Republican Groups Set $500 Million Fundraising Target

Barack Obama Super Pac
First Posted: 02/ 7/2012 1:37 pm Updated: 02/ 7/2012 1:59 pm



WASHINGTON -- Details are beginning to emerge about the Monday night announcement that President Barack Obama's reelection campaign would lend its support to a super PAC run by a former Obama aide. According to senior campaign officials, the president, who has been very critical of super PACs and the court decisions that helped to create them, signed off on his campaign lending support to Priorities USA Action.
In a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, senior campaign officials explained that the move to support Priorities USA Action was made after watching super PAC spending flood into the Republican primary and hearing about the combined $500 million benchmark set by the Karl Rove-linked Crossroads groups and the Koch Brothers to defeat the president.
"With the influx of Republican spending on super PACs [and] the recent reports that Republican super PACs are committed to raising half a billion to defeat the president," a campaign official said, "we made the decision to not allow the Republicans to be the [sole] beneficiary of unlimited spending."
Priorities USA Action was founded in May 2011 by former White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton. The group, like all other super PACs, can accept unlimited contributions from corporations, unions and individuals. It has, however, struggled to raise money, at least in part because of the previous lack of support from the president and his campaign.
How it raises money going forward could conflict with some of the policies put in place by the Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee to reduce the influence of special interests.
Senior campaign officials noted that they had no control over whether the super PAC accepted contributions from registered lobbyists, which the campaign and the DNC do not accept, and that they would not lend support to the so-called secret-money arm of Priorities USA Action.
"That's not a decision we can make," a senior campaign official said when asked about the super PAC receiving contributions from lobbyists. "That's a decision for Priorities."
The Obama campaign has made it a central point that the campaign does not raise money from lobbyists or political action committees. If Priorities USA Action allowed lobbyists to give money and attend events featuring Obama campaign and administration officials, that could undermine the lobbyist-free message of the campaign. A request for comment from Priorities USA Action on its practices was not immediately returned.
As for Priorities USA, the 501(c)(4) nonprofit arm of the super PAC that is not required to disclose its donors, a campaign official said, "We're not lending support to the 501(c)(4)."
In a Monday night blog post on the Obama campaign's website, campaign manager Jim Messina noted the campaign's wish that all contributions it funnels to the super PAC be disclosed: "We will do so only in the knowledge and with the expectation that all of its donations will be fully disclosed as required by law to the Federal Election Commission."
But Priorities USA Action and the affiliated Priorities USA operate under a cost-sharing agreement for administrative expenses. So far, the secret-money group has covered upwards of $215,000 in costs for the super PAC. That's money supporting the super PAC for which the donors will not be disclosed.
When asked about this on the conference call, a senior campaign official responded, "That doesn't implicate our direct appearances."


Republican primary: Colorado, Minnesota, Missouri live updates
Treasuries Remain Lower After Results of $32 Billion Three-Year Note Sale



Obama Signs Executive Order Imposing New Sanctions On Iranian Government, Central Bank

Obama Iran
By JULIE PACE   02/ 6/12 11:20 AM ETAP          

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama has ordered new sanctions on the Islamic republic, including its Central Bank, in a move to enforce a law he signed in December.
In a letter to Congress Monday, Obama said the tougher sanctions are warranted "particularly in light of the deceptive practices of the Central Bank of Iran and other Iranian banks." He said the problems included the hiding transactions of sanctioned parties, the deficiencies of Iran's anti-money laundering regime and the unacceptably high risk posed to the entire international financial system posed by Iran's activities.
The Central Bank sanctions were included as an amendment in the wide-ranging defense bill Obama signed into law at the end of 2011. The White House said Obama signed the executive order approving the sanctions on Sunday, well ahead of the six-month window he was afforded in the defense bill.
Obama's fresh swipe at Tehran come as the White House tries to both ratchet up pressure on the Islamic republic to abandon its nuclear program and dissuade Israel from launching a unilateral strike on Iran, a move that could roil the Middle East and jolt the global economy.
Obama said Sunday he does not believe Israel has yet decided whether to attack Iran and still believes a diplomatic solution is possible.
Iran insists that its nuclear pursuit is for peaceful purposes, but the West accuses Iran of developing the know-how to build a nuclear bomb. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta last week would not dispute a report that he believes Israel may attack Iran this spring in an attempt to set back the Islamic republic's nuclear program.
A Treasury Department statement said the sanctions underscore that the administration is determined to hold Iran accountable for meeting international obligations over its nuclear program. The statement said Iran should get the message that "it will face ever-increasing economic and diplomatic pressure" until it answers the world's well-founded concerns about its nuclear intentions.
The department also said foreign financial institutions engaged in "arms-length transactions" with the Central Bank would not be impacted by the sanctions that Obama ordered Sunday, but remain at risk of such penalties if they undertake significant transactions with the bank or other Iranian financial institutions.
The sanctions amendment in the defense bill compelled U.S. punishment of foreign financial institutions that conduct transactions through Iran's Central Bank in order to import petroleum. Several U.S. allies in Europe and Asia engage in such business with Iran.
The administration expressed concern at the time that the sanctions could lead to a spike in global oil prices, hampering the American economic recovery and perhaps perversely enabling Iran to reap even greater revenues from its oil exports. That would defeat the purpose of the bill, which is to hamper Tehran's alleged support for international terrorism and its ability to fund its nuclear enrichment program.
Under the law, Obama had the option of waiving penalties for national security reasons.
The White House sees sanctions as an effective method of increasing pressure on Iran and officials say the penalties have started to squeeze Iran's economy.
In recent weeks, both the U.S. and European Union have imposed harsher sanctions on Iran's oil sector, the lifeblood of its economy.
In Washington, the Senate Banking Committee also easily approved yet more penalties on Tehran last week. The sweeping measure, which is not yet law, would target Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, require companies that trade on the U.S. stock exchanges to disclose any Iran-related business to the Securities and Exchange Commission, and expand penalties for energy and uranium mining joint ventures with Tehran.
 

Wink pleads guilty to charges related to John Doe probe


10:20 pm, February 7, 2012, by Beverly Taylor


MILWAUKEE — Former Milwaukee County worker, Darlene Wink pleaded guilty to charges Tuesday related to a John Doe probe. Wink pleaded guilty in exchange for providing information for another investigation. Wink faces two misdemeanor counts of intentional political solicitation by a public employee and will be sentenced May 15th.
Wink was Governor Scott Walker’s constituent services coordinator when he was Milwaukee County Executive. Wink is accused of engaging in fundraising activity for Walker’s gubernatorial campaign while in a County building, using County equipment. Wink is adamant that Walker was unaware of the campaign work she was doing on County time.
Wisconsin Democratic Party spokesman Graeme Zielinski doesn’t believe Wink’s claim that Walker knew nothing. “We don’t know what the days ahead are going to show, but it’s pretty clear that every criminal act performed by Wink, which she pleaded guilty to today, was done for Walker. The people of Wisconsin should be afraid that he has imported this criminal culture to Madison,” Zielinski said.
Prosecutors did their part with the misdemeanor charges, and now Wink must do her part. “She’s agreed to cooperate fully with any information that the district attorney is looking for. She wants to cooperate fully particularly with the embezzlement charges, and we’ll see where the investigations lead from there,” Defense Attorney Peter Wolff said. Additionally, as part of the plea deal, prosecutors are free to argue for probation or fines versus jail time, but ultimately, the sentence will be up to a judge.
On Friday, Governor Walker voluntarily agreed to meet with the Milwaukee County district attorney regarding the John Doe Investigation. So far, the meeting has not happened. Walker has said the following regarding the John Doe investigation and the charges against Wink: “I had a clear and defined expressed policy that individuals who worked for me in my office or in my cabinet, or for the County at that time were prohibited from using County time or County resources for political purposes.”
So far, charges have been filed against five people as a result of the John Doe Investigation. It is unclear at this time whether Wink will assist in their prosecutions. Without this plea deal, Wink would face a maximum of six months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine.


Obama Administration Defends Contraception Rule Amid Mounting Criticism

Obama Contraception Rule
First Posted: 02/ 8/2012 9:45 am Updated: 02/ 8/2012 10:39 am


By Susan Heavey
WASHINGTON--The Obama administration is willing to work with Catholic universities, hospitals and other church-affiliated employers to implement a new policy that requires health insurers to offer birth control coverage, a top adviser to the president's re-election campaign said on Tuesday.
David Axelrod, a senior campaign adviser to President Barack Obama, said the administration had heard the Roman Catholic Church's concerns and never intended to "abridge anyone's religious freedom."
But he gave no sign that the administration would reverse course under intensifying pressure from church leaders and political heat from Republican presidential candidates.
"This is an important issue. It's important for millions of women across this country. We want to resolve it in an appropriate way, and we're going to do that," Axelrod said in remarks on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program.
White House spokesman Jay Carney also sought to diffuse criticism from church leaders, telling reporters later on Tuesday the administration would work with religious organizations "to see if the implementation of the policy can be done in a way that allays some of those concerns."
U.S. Catholic bishops have slammed the Obama administration for a regulation finalized on January 20 that would require health insurance to include birth control and other preventative health services for women. The leaders contend the policy infringes on religious liberty because the church does not condone birth control of any kind.
Over the weekend, Catholic clergy across the country called for congregations to pressure Obama to back down.
"To force American citizens to choose between violating their consciences and forgoing their healthcare is literally unconscionable," said Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, in a statement last month.
Jim Towey, president of Ave Maria University in Florida, who also served in the administration of President George W. Bush, said on Tuesday he would fight the provision using "all lawful means at our disposal."
"Our non-Catholic employees and students understand fully that the University must adhere to Catholic teaching and they do not expect us to provide such services," he said in a statement.
REPUBLICANS SEE ASSAULT
The controversy centers on a provision in the 2010 healthcare bill which requires health insurance to cover basic preventative services for women. An advisory group, the Institute of Medicine, had recommended covering a fuller range of contraceptive services to help prevent unwanted pregnancies.
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius adopted the institute's recommendation but included an exemption for churches, although not related religious organizations such as hospitals.
Twenty-eight U.S. states already require health insurers to cover contraception.
The issue quickly took on political dimensions, with Republican presidential contenders criticizing the administration for violating religious liberties. Obama is seeking re-election in what many see as a referendum on his performance during the last three years.
Republican presidential frontrunner Mitt Romney, in Colorado on Tuesday, called the requirement an "assault on religion."
Republican rival Rick Santorum, who is Catholic, called the White House's comments "ridiculous" while speaking in Colorado on Monday. Rival Newt Gingrich, also a Catholic, has also declared the policy a war on religious freedom.
Florida Senator Marco Rubio, whose name has surfaced as a possible Republican vice presidential candidate, has introduced a bill to further expand the exemption for religious employers.
On Capitol Hill, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Chuck Grassley, urged the Obama administration to rescind the provision.
"As currently written, this mandate will result in litigation that could be avoided if HHS issued a regulation that showed greater respect for religious freedom," Grassley said in a letter to Sebelius.
In remarks on the Senate Floor, Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, said the debate was off in the wrong direction. "For the first time in a long time, our nation is talking about women's health, ... but unfortunately, too much of it isn't really about women's health. It is politics disguised as women's health," Mikulski said.
ALLAYING CONCERNS
Just how religious-based organizations could implement the rule to meet the Obama administration's criteria while still holding fast to their core beliefs remains to be seen.
Carney offered no details but said the White House would discuss possible avenues over the next 18 months.
Jennifer Duffy, senior political analyst for The Cook Political Report, said neither side was likely to back down in the run-up to the election.
"I don't think the bishops have any intention of letting this fade and, especially if their position is intractable, then it's a fight," she said. "It becomes a staring contest."
Emergency contraception, also known as the "morning after pill" and seen by many conservatives as akin to abortion, for the most part would not fall under the rule since it is already available without a prescription to those 17 and older.
Women's rights groups and other contraception supporters, who were disappointed last year when the Obama administration rejected a push to make emergency contraception more widely available, had feared Obama might widen the exemption.
Susan Wood, a health professor at George Washington University's Jacobs Institute of Women's Health who backs birth control, said religious groups should have no more control over what employees do with their insurance than with their salaries.
"This is an employee benefit issue. This is not the Catholic Church having to provide a service directly. No Catholic hospital is going to be required to write a prescription or provide a pack of pills."
Two polls released by Planned Parenthood, which provides birth control and reproductive services, showed the majority of voters, including Catholics, support contraceptive coverage.
(Reporting By Susan Heavey; additional reporting by Steve Holland in Colorado, Laura MacInnis in Washington and Greg McCune in Chicago; Editing by Marilyn W. Thompson, Eric Beech and Todd Eastham)

Koch Brothers, Allies Pledge $100 Million At Private Meeting To Beat Obama

Posted: 2/3/12  |  Updated: 2/6/12
Koch
David Koch, executive vice president of Koch Industries, attends a meeting of the Economic Club of New York, Monday, April 11, 2011. (AP)
WASHINGTON -- At a private three-day retreat in California last weekend, conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch and about 250 to 300 other individuals pledged approximately $100 million to defeat President Obama in the 2012 elections.
A source who was in the room when the pledges were made told The Huffington Post that, specifically, Charles Koch pledged $40 million and David pledged $20 million.
The semi-annual, invitation-only meeting attracts wealthy donors, Republican politicians and conservative activists. Last year, hundreds of activists gathered outside the walled-off resort to protest the meeting. This year, however, the conference went off quietly.
"Conference organizers and their guests successfully slipped in and out of the Coachella Valley without being detected, by buying out nearly all of the 500-plus rooms at the Renaissance Esmeralda resort in Indian Wells," reported The Desert Sun. "The resort closed its restaurants, locked down the grounds with private security guards and sent many workers home."
This is the ninth straight year the Kochs have hosted the conference. As Politico reported last year, the meetings often adjourn "after soliciting pledges of support from the donors -- sometimes totaling as much as $50 million -- to nonprofit groups favored by the Kochs."
The fact that the wealthy conservative donors pledged $100 million for the 2012 elections shows how intent they are on trying to get Obama out of office -- and previews how intense, and likely nasty, the general election will be.
There are limits on how much an individual can give to a political candidate. Therefore, much of the money pledged at the recent gathering will likely go to super PACs or nonprofits that can spend and accept unlimited amounts of funds. GOP primary voters have already gotten a glimpse of how the political system looks with super PACs around: record amounts of money spent on a large number of negative ads in the early primary states.
The source told The Huffington Post that they lamented the direction the conference has taken over the years. They said it used to be about "conservative strategy" and building a movement, but now it was mostly an "alpha male" spectacle focused on fundraising to beat Obama.
The Koch brothers have been the major donors behind many Republican candidates, the Tea Party movement and efforts to discredit the science around man-made global warming. Democrats frequently highlight the brothers to fundraise, and the first TV ad of the Obama reelection campaign invoked them as "secretive oil billionaires attacking President Obama with ads fact checkers say are not tethered to the facts."
Also at the conference was Ken Griffin, founder and CEO of the Citadel Investment Group. He supported Obama in 2008, leading his employees to contribute more than $205,000 to the campaign. By the time of the election, however, he had switched his allegiance to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). Since the election, he has openly discussed his "frustration" with Obama's policies, stating that he is "greatly concerned about the fiscal instability of the U.S." In the fourth quarter of 2011, Citadel employees completely abandoned Obama, contributing nothing to his campaign while giving $120,500 to presidential candidate Mitt Romney.
The Center for Public Integrity also reported that for the first time, Las Vegas casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson attended the conference. Adelson and his family are largely bankrolling Newt Gingrich's presidential run, with Adelson and his wife, Miriam, having given the pro-Gingrich super PAC Winning Our Future $10 million just this year.
Koch Industries did not return a request for comment.

SNL's Newt Gingrich Moon Colony Cold Open (VIDEO)



Arthur Delaney

  

First Posted: 02/ 5/2012 12:10 pm Updated: 02/ 5/2012 12:23 pm
WASHINGTON -- Newt Gingrich is not chagrined over the "Saturday Night Live" mockery of his proposal to colonize the moon. If America doesn't go there, Gingrich said, somebody else will.
"I made a speech on the space coast in Florida to serious people who spent their lifetime trying to help America get into space," Gingrich said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday. "Every serious analyst understands the Chinese are going all out to dominate space, and the Russians today have the only man-rated vehicle for space."
In January before the Florida primary, Gingrich said that if he were elected president, he'd establish a moon colony by 2020. He suggested the moon could become the 51st state once its population reached 13,000.
His remarks were widely considered the most grandiose pandering the 2012 presidential contest had seen so far, but Gingrich has remained adamant about his space vision. After "Meet the Press" host David Gregory played the opening moments of the SNL skit, Gingrich stayed serious.
"I proposed a fundamental reform of NASA to engage the private sector in very bold and very dramatic ventures, and I think Greta van Susteren got it right," Gingrich said. "She said she could not imagine President John F. Kennedy being met with the kind of attacks and the ridicule and the lack of faith in America that has come up in the last few days. I believe it's possible to unleash the American people to inspire the private sector and encourage entrepreneurs and to have a better space program than we have today, and I think every American should wonder why we spend billions and billions on NASA and currently have no vehicle to put human beings into space."
"This was not some slip," Gingrich continued. "This was a deliberate effort to start a conversation at a time when the Chinese, the Indians and the Russians are aggressively moving into space, and we are mired down in red tape, spending billions of dollars without making progress."
Space-program experts have warned that colonizing the moon by 2020 would not be easy.


Around the Web:

Ground control to Major Newt: Gingrich's moon base, brain science ...
Newt Gingrich promises to build a moon colony by 2020; make it a ...
Newt Gingrich's moon colony and Mars plan. - Slate Magazine
Newt Gingrich's moon base plan a 'cheap trick' to get votes, space ...
Newt Gingrich's Moon Colony by 2020: Can It Be Done? | Newt ...
Newt Gingrich Promises Moon Base, Flights to Mars: A Reality ...
Why Newt Gingrich's Moon Colony Is A Good Idea And Why It's Still ...

Rick Santorum Opines On Susan G. Komen Foundation's Planned Parenthood Decision

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/ 5/2012 12:08 pm Updated: 02/ 5/2012 5:18 pm


Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum sounded off on the Susan G. Komen for the Cure decision to cut off funds to Planned Parenthood for breast exams, which it reversed in part Friday.
"I don't believe breast cancer research is advanced by funding an organization that does abortions where you've seen ties to cancer and abortions," said a hoarse Santorum on "Fox News Sunday." In fact, a 2007 study published by the Archives of Internal Medicine studying 105,716 women found no link between breast cancer and abortions. Abortion services account for about three percent of Planned Parenthood's activities, while cancer screening and prevention accounts for 16 percent.
"So I don't think it's a particularly healthy way of contributing money to further the cause of breast cancer, but that's for private organizations like Susan G. Komen to make that decision," continued Santorum.
The Huffington Post's Laura Bassett noted that Komen apologized, repeated that it would continue to fund existing grants and make Planned Parenthood eligible for future grants. Komen did not, however, promise to renew Planned Parenthood grants.
Santorum also criticized a recent Obama administration rule requiring religiously affiliated employers -- but not churches and other places of worship -- to provide contraception under their health plans without charge.
"This is the problem when government tells you that they can give you things. They can take it away, but even worse they can tell you how you're going to exercise this new right that they've given you consistent with their values instead of the values guaranteed in our Constitution," he said.
The former Pennsylvania senator finished last in Saturday's caucuses in Nevada.


These are some of Rick Santorum's View
On Contraception
 Uploaded by on Oct 18, 2011
Rick Santorum discusses character, core values, how to address broken families, spending cuts, education, border security, national security, and his jobs plan with CaffeinatedThoughts.com editor, Shane Vander Hart.

Rick Santorum Doesn't Believe in ... Freedom? ( Freedom Watch Judge Napolitano 1-5-2012 )  

Rick Santorum Hates Freedom, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness Uploaded by on Jan 5, 2012

This guy is off his rocker !!!!!!!!!!!Rick Santorum says that the pursuit of happiness is harming America. FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Rick Santorum - Can Gay People Stop Being gay?  Is he a racist bigot?  Uploaded by on Jan 1, 2012

I was in the military and lived in a barracks environment. It's not whether or not you're gay or straight - it's whether or not you know your proper boundaries. ANYONE - gay or straight - who works in a team environment (be it an office, a school, a military barracks or wherever) can make everyone around them uncomfortable by being sexually forward. If Santorum thinks homesexuality is a "choice," he's goofy. But that doesn't justify this interviewer's "gotcha jornalism" about race.

Bigot Rick Santorum - Caught on Video!

Uploaded by on Jan 5, 2012
Yes, Rick Santorum, you are is a hateful bigot, even when you hide behind a Bible.

Here Rick Santorum refers to gays when he says they have no socially redeeming qualities. He also suggests that the American Psychological Association and the American Medical Associations are no more than a social clubs agreeing amongst themselves when they publish scientific facts he disagrees with. He even shouts down students - calling one a "laywer" for asking questions he can't answer - and for actually having the audacity to stand up against his wanton bigotry.

Santorum says that the Bible is always and unalterably true - and is the wisdom and truth upon which his entire life stands.