Pages

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Guidelines Allow Earlier Definition of Alzheimer’s





RelatedFor the first time in 27 years, the definition of Alzheimer’s disease is being recast in new medical guidelines that reflect fast-mounting evidence that it begins ravaging the brain years before the symptoms of dementia.

Readers' Comments

"The mental anguish of living with a diagnosis would most certainly be as debilitating as the disease itself; especially if it was wrong. Sometimes, ignorance is bliss."
susan w., central Idaho
The guidelines, to be issued Tuesday by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association, divide the disease into three stages: a phase when dementia has developed, a middle phase in which mild problems emerge but daily functions can still be performed, and the most recently discovered phase, in which no symptoms are evident but changes are brewing in the brain.
“We’re redefining Alzheimer’s disease and looking at this in a different way than had ever been done,” said Creighton Phelps, director of the National Institute on Aging’s Alzheimer’s Disease Centers Program. “I think we’re going to start to identify it earlier and earlier.”
The drive to diagnose Alzheimer’s before it has progressed into profound dementia is also reflected in a bill introduced in Congress this month, which would create specific Medicarecost codes for Alzheimer’s diagnosis, including steps involving discussions between the patient’s doctor and caregivers, a recognition that keeping family members well-informed can result in better planning and care.
“Early diagnosis is really the key to this,” said Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts and a sponsor of the bill. “Oftentimes family members notice the symptoms in their loved ones, but it’s only years later that they get diagnosed or understand what resources are available.”
The most striking addition to the guidelines concerns methods that assess brain changes involved in Alzheimer’s, including brain scans and tests of cerebral spinal fluid. Such methods measure what are called biomarkers, physiological indicators that someone is likely to develop dementia eventually, just as cholesterol and blood pressure are biomarkers of impending heart disease.
For now, the guidelines specify that Alzheimer’s biomarkers — including abnormal levels of the proteins amyloid and tau, and shrinkage of certain brain areas — should not yet be put into widespread use, but used only with patients enrolled in clinical trials.
That is because scientists cannot yet standardize the results of the tests, or know “what measure is truly abnormal and what measure is not,” said Marilyn Albert, director of theJohns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, and a leader of one working group that developed the new guidelines.
As many as a third of people with amyloid plaques in their brains, for example, have not developed Alzheimer’s symptoms by the time they die. The guidelines also urge caution because there is currently no drug known to halt or significantly delay the onset of symptoms, so people told they are likely to get Alzheimer’s have no effective medication to take.
“We don’t have enough information about what to tell people,” said Dr. Steven DeKosky, dean of the University of Virginia medical school, who participated in one of the working groups. “Until you can tell a clinician, ‘If you do this test you have X amount of reliability and to do that will make a difference in the life of your patient’ — until then, it remains in the lab.”
But the guidelines reflect a sense in the medical community that the moment when science will have more specific knowledge about biomarkers is not that far off. They are intended to encourage more research so that drugs can be developed to attack early brain changes and to identify people who might benefit from such drugs when they become available.
The goal, said William Thies, chief medical and scientific officer for the Alzheimer’sAssociation, is “extending the range of our ability to investigate this disease and eventually find the treatment that is going to be so necessary to avoid the epidemic of Alzheimer’s disease that we see facing us over the next 40 years.”
In the short term, the biggest impact is likely to be seen with people who fall into the middle phase, those with mild cognitive impairment linked to Alzheimer’s. Experts say there are at least as many people experiencing this phase as the 5.4 million people estimated to have Alzheimer’s dementia. And they expect others to now ask their doctors if they are showing signs of mild impairment, which include experiencing some difficulty or inefficiency with memory, attention or other mental faculties, while still being able to function independently.
Dr. Albert said that if patients with symptoms of mild cognitive impairment wanted to “increase the certainty” of the diagnosis by getting a brain scan or spinal fluid test, they should obtain such tests in a research trial so they have a better chance of getting accurate results.
The guidelines also clarify diagnosis criteria for people with dementia symptoms, distinguishing Alzheimer’s from other dementias, including vascular, fronto-temporal and Lewy body. And they note that the earliest symptom of Alzheimer’s dementia is not always memory loss, but could be mood changes or problems with language, spatial perception or reasoning.
Dr. Pierre Tariot, director of the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute in Phoenix, who was not involved in drafting the guidelines, called them “a step in the right direction” that he hoped would not be “misconstrued” as a sign that biomarker tests are further along than they are. He added, “The notion that Alzheimer’s disease is a continuum that has an extensive pre-symptomatic phase is a very important message to get out.”
Dr. Phelps said it would hardly be the last word from the medical community on Alzheimer’s.
“We’re not drawing a line and saying this is it,” Dr. Phelps said. “What we’re saying is this is the best of our knowledge and we’re not going to wait 27 years to revisit these again.”

Brizard won praise from N.Y. colleagues, catcalls from unions




Story Image
Jean-Claude Brizard leaves Kelly High School after Mayor-Elect Rahm Emanuel introduced him as the new CEO of Chicago Public Schools, Monday, April 18, 2011 during a press conference. | Jean Lachat~Sun-Times

Born in Haiti and raised in poverty in a New York housing project by his immigrant parents — both teachers — Jean-Claude Brizard had to fight his way to the top.
For a man supporters describe as as a charismatic charmer with a winning smile, the 6 foot 5 educator known to pals as “J.C.” has collected his fair share of anecdotes to illustrate his steelier side.
When, in his early days as a teacher of teen inmates at Riker’s Island jail, his students picked up chairs and came at him, Brizard won their respect by picking up a chair himself and telling them he wasn’t afraid to go down with them.
And when — during his period as an administrator in charge of more than 100 New York schools — he entered a high school basement unannounced and found 100 unsupervised students smoking marijuana and kissing, he angrily confronted the principal in her office.
“When I walk in, she’s sitting there with her peaceful little waterfall and classical music and the whole school was in chaos,” Brizard told a reporter last year.
“It took me years, but I got her fired.”
Brizard may not have been as outspoken on Monday, when Mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel refused to let him answer questions from the media, but his rough edge and knack for confrontation upset many over the last three years, when he ran the school system in Rochester, N.Y.
The teacher’s union there overwhelmingly passed a vote of no confidence in his leadership in February, criticizing him for failing to consult with teachers about reform plans. The union had battled with Brizard over his plans to bring in merit pay, fire ineffective teachers, close under performing schools and set up charter schools.
Rochester Teacher’s Association President Adam Urbanski said at the time that the no confidence vote showed “you cannot be a leader if you do not have followers.”
But Philadelphia School District Supt. Arlene Ackerman, who has acted a mentor to Brizard for years, said such criticism “is part of the superintendent’s job — if everybody’s happy you’re not doing your job.” Brizard is “unflappable” in a crisis, she added.
Rochester Institute of Technology president Bill Destler praised Brizard for his “courageous” efforts to take on the union, saying “he made it clear it was never about him, it was about the students.” He added that Rochester’s loss was Chicago’s gain, though he acknowledged that the polarized atmosphere in Rochester had made it increasingly hard for Brizard to work there in recent months.
Speaking last year Brizard himself said the shake up in upstate New York — which Emanuel hopes he can now repeat in Chicago — was needed because “What existed here for a long time was this culture where everyone was collaborating, but nothing was getting done. Everyone was singing Kumbaya and everybody’s friends, but nothing moves.”
Contributing: Rochester Democrat and Chronicle

Beginning of Passover with a Seder

Barack Obama's White House Presidential Office (D) posted a Photo on April 18, 2011 | 11:28 pm 


P041811PS-0525
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama mark the beginning of Passover with a Seder in the Old Family Dining Room of the White House, April 18, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.

The Obama Speech Downgrade



S&P's 'negative' outlook on the President's budget strategy.


Why did Standard & Poor's drop its "negative" long-term outlook bomb on America's AAA credit rating yesterday? S&P revealed no numbers not previously known to a "shocked" stock market, which dropped 140 points. So what's new?
Chief White House economist Austan Goolsbee declared that S&P had made a "political judgment," and we'd have to agree, though probably not for the same reasons. The bulk of S&P's analysis is taken up with repeatedly citing what it sees as next-to-no chance that Washington will do anything significant on deficit reduction this year or next.
"The outlook reflects our view of the increased risk that the political negotiations over when and how to address both the medium- and long-term challenges will persist until at least after the national elections in 2012," said the credit rating outfit. S&P's announcement is almost wholly apolitical analysis of the budget outlook.
There is only one reason the rating agency could suddenly have turned this dark on politics in Washington: President Obama's speech at George Washington University last Wednesday. Mr. Obama's "fiscal policy" speech may have sent progressive pundits cart-wheeling, but its political effect was to poison the prospect for budget negotiations.
The harshness of Mr. Obama's anti-Republican rhetoric and the universal conclusion that this was a Presidential campaign speech make it very difficult for GOP Congressional leaders to believe they can enter into a budget negotiation in which the White House will deal in good faith.
The hyper-politicized Obama White House calculated that the release of a GOP proposal by House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan was the moment to unveil its re-election counter-attack. This week Mr. Obama is taking that speech on what looks like the campaign trail, first at a Virginia community college and then in front of the millionaires and billionaires at Facebook's headquarters in Silicon Valley.
AFP/Getty Images
Traders work at their posts on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Monday.
S&P, as did many others, said it saw the Obama and Ryan budget proposals "as the starting point of a process," but "That said, we see the path to agreement as challenging because the gap between the parties remains wide." And: "We believe there is a significant risk that Congressional negotiations could result in no agreement." And this stalemate will continue "over the next two years."
S&P is simply connecting the political dots after last week's un-Presidential tirade against the GOP.
S&P's analysis also discussed fiscal conditions, most notably the scale of the deficit problem before and after 2008: "[I]n 2003-2008, the U.S.'s general (total) government deficit fluctuated between 2% and 5% of GDP. Already larger than that of most 'AAA' rated sovereigns, it ballooned to more than 11% in 2009 and has yet to recover." This surely is one Bush comparison that the Obama team wishes to bury.
The S&P outlook also says its baseline scenario for the U.S. economy is "near 3% annual real growth." But "near" 3% growth will not revive tax revenue enough to shrink the growing U.S. debt burden, which is heading toward 80% of GDP.
Notably, there was no call in the S&P note for closing the deficit with tax increases, a staple of ratings-agency fiscal fixes. We hope this neutrality reflects some recognition of the way countries like Greece, pressed to cut spending while raising taxes, descend into an endless downward growth spiral. That's how a nation's outlook becomes truly "negative."
The Obama fiscal policy since 2009 has been to explode the U.S. balance sheet with ever-greater spending financed by monetary reflation—which the President in his speech euphemized as "emergency steps." The result after more than two years is what scares S&P and more than a few Americans: a historically subpar recovery, unprecedented deficits, persistently high unemployment, commodity inflation and now growing anxiety over U.S. creditworthiness.
The Ryan budget has been criticized as heartless and cruel. But its purpose is to address the rising U.S. debt problem without tanking the U.S. economy, and to do so before a truly heartless and cruel credit downgrade of the sort S&P gave Japan in January. Mr. Obama's response was simply to mock the GOP proposal.
The ratings agencies are hardly the last word on U.S. economic health. But the S&P outlook is a warning to the White House that financial markets have noticed that this President seems to have decided that his path to re-election lies in demonizing his opponents rather than seeing to the nation's fiscal well-being.

Putting it Plainly


Every day, the Federal Government is engaged in communication with the American public. When Federal agencies are explaining how businesses can comply with legal requirements, or informing people about Federal services and benefits, they should write clearly and avoid jargon. But far too often, agencies use confusing, technical, and acronym-filled language.  Such language can cost consumers and small business owners precious time in their efforts to play by the rules.
The good news is that relatively small efforts to communicate more clearly can minimize that burden. Take this example: the Federal Communications Commission used to receive so many questions from the public about its requirements for ham radio operations that five full-time employees were needed to provide answers. After the requirements were written in plain language, questions dropped off so dramatically that all five of those employees could be reassigned to more pressing activity at the Commission.
In short, writing in plain language can make a huge difference. That is why President Obama signed the Plain Writing Act of 2010 into law last October. By improving government communications, the Act will not only save money but also facilitate two-way communication between agencies and the public and make it is far easier for people to understand what they are being asked to do.
To promote the use of plain language in Federal documents, I issued final guidance (pdf) last Wednesday to help Federal agencies to comply with the Act.  Whenever officials provide information about Federal benefits and services, produce documents that are necessary for filing taxes, or offer notices or instructions to the public, they must now write clearly and concisely. In addition, agencies must train employees to use plain language, create a plain writing section of their websites, and designate a senior official to oversee the implementation of the Act.
These requirements may not sound like giant steps, but they can yield big improvements in efficiency. A study inBusiness Horizons, the journal of Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business, found that when a US Navy memorandum was rewritten into plain language, it took 17-23 percent less time to read. The authors concluded that, the Navy “could save annually anywhere between $27 and $73 million [in 1991 dollars] worth of wasted reading and rereading time if its officers alone used the plain style.”
As our economic recovery continues, strong implementation of the Plain Writing Act is vital to ensuring that we are minimizing burdens on American business and the public as a whole.   
Cass Sunstein is Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

The farce that is Donald Trump


He's praised Obama and said he's pro-choice. Now he's a pro-life birther who pretends to go to church. What a hoax VIDEO

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

CIA declassifies WWI-era secret documents




WASHINGTON (AP) -- The CIA lifted the lid on one corner of the cloak and dagger world of World War I, declassifying six of the oldest secret documents in the U.S. government archives, the agency announced Tuesday.
The documents show top techniques used by spies, generals and diplomats to send secret messages in a diplomatic war that raged long after the guns stopped. The records reveal how invisible ink was used to send word between allies, and spies learned to open letters to read each other's secrets without leaving a trace.
One document suggests this method for passing secret messages: soaking a handkerchief or collar in a mixture of nitrate, soda and starch, then drying the fabric. The chemicals come out when the cloth is placed in water. The liquid becomes invisible ink, that can be loaded into a pen and used to write a message. The recipient develops the writing by applying a second chemical, iodate of potassium.
There's even a document written in French of the German's secret ink formula, showing the French had cracked the enemy's code.
"These documents remained classified for nearly a century until recent advancements in technology made it possible to release them," CIA Director Leon E. Panetta said in a statement Tuesday.
Recent advances in the chemistry of secret ink, and the lighting methods used to detect it have made the secrets revealed Tuesday obsolete, explained CIA spokesperson Marie E. Harf.
Documents on secret writing fall under the CIA's authority to declassify. The agency declassified more than a million historical documents last year alone, the agency said.
But the CIA was not always so eager to share these particular secrets, according to Steve Aftergood, of the Federation for American Scientists. He says the CIA resisted a Freedom of Information Act request in 2002 to release the records.
Nor was he impressed at Panetta's statement that the documents could be released now because of new technological advances.
"Invisible ink was rendered obsolete by digital encryption long ago, not in the last few years," Aftergood said.
"Director Panetta is attempting to rationalize the CIA's irrational information policies, but there is no known basis for his claim."
The documents are now available on the agency's website at the site's Freedom of Information Act Electronic Reading Room.
Scholars will also be able to examine them at the National Archives.
---
Online:

http://www.cia.gov







Declassified CIA documents (all pdf):
The rest of tonight's links to come in a little while.