Pages

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

To Boldly Go Where No Party Has Gone Before...


FEB 7, 2011, VOL. 16, NO. 20 • BY MATTHEW CONTINETTI


After watching the State of the Union address, we’ve finally figured out which position President Obama could play for the Steelers on Super Bowl Sunday. He’d make a great punter.
/><p class=Michael Ramirez
Decades of overspending and overpromising by the federal government, combined with a plunge in tax revenues, are pushing America to the brink of fiscal crisis. Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, and interest on the national debt are gobbling up the gross domestic product. The aging Baby Boomers, meanwhile, are waiting in the wings.
President Obama knows the nature and extent of the crisis. His own debt commission reported in December, “If the U.S. does not put its house in order, the reckoning will be sure and the devastation severe.” And the debt commission offered plenty of intriguing ways to address the problem. Its plans to overhaul the tax code and Social Security were especially bold. Commissioners Paul Ryan and Alice Rivlin, moreover, delivered their own proposal to turn Medicare into a sustainable defined-contribution system. And a separate presidential commission, led by Paul -Volcker, outlined a corporate tax reform that would lower rates while closing loopholes.
Obama could have adopted any of these policies as his own. He could have used the State of the Union to challenge Republicans to work with him on bringing the government’s finances into balance while encouraging economic growth. He could have seized the deficit-hawk middle ground and possibly split the GOP in the process. Instead, he punted. He left it up to Republicans to take the ball and run.

Republicans: Halt taxpayer aid for Fannie, Freddie

, On Wednesday February 9, 2011, 4:17 pm EST
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal taxpayers should stop propping up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and Congress will wean the country away from its reliance on the two huge but fiscally feeble housing finance companies, House Republicans said Wednesday.
Democrats conceded that changes are needed in Fannie and Freddie, which have swallowed $150 billion in federal aid since the government took them over in September 2008. But they cautioned that care must be taken to avoid jeopardizing the popular 30-year fixed rate mortgage and the access to the housing market that the two companies have helped provide to millions of moderate-income families.
The lawmakers made those points at a hearing Wednesday of the House Financial Services subcommittee that oversees the two housing giants.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats are ready to push specific plans or timetables for overhauling Fannie and Freddie through Congress. That underscores the divisions that exist over how to fix the way the nation's $11 trillion housing market is financed, and the hesitation many lawmakers feel about making drastic changes in such an enormous sector at a time when the economy is beginning to rebuild strength after its deep swoon of the past three years.
Congress' work on reshaping the country's mortgage finance system is expected to take months or longer.
Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., who chairs the subcommittee, said his goal is "to ensure that we put an end to this destructive and costly housing finance policy that protects taxpayers and actually strengthens communities instead of destroying them."
Many Republicans argue that Fannie and Freddie were a major cause of the nation's housing crisis of falling home prices and numerous foreclosures by financing numerous subprime loans -- mortgages that quickly became worthless because they went to people who could not afford them.
Democrats say Fannie and Freddie merely followed the private sector, which set the pace for making subprime loans, and performed the constructive functions of keeping 30-year mortgages affordable and helping lower income families become homeowners.
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., the subcommittee's top Democrat, said she is open to any plan that takes steps like preserving the 30-year mortgage and helping all qualified borrowers get loans.
Waters said that while the details of any housing finance overhaul are crucial, "I think it's even more important that we make clear what values underpin our vision for the future."
In coming days, the Treasury Department is expected to release a report stating the Obama administration's views on how to reshape Fannie and Freddie. That report is expected to propose several options for revamping the country's housing finance system, including phasing Fannie and Freddie out and gradually shrinking the government's role in mortgage financing, according to lobbyists who have heard descriptions of the plan.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats suggested specific plans for overhauling the two companies, a task that is expected to take Congress many months or longer.
In coming days, the Treasury Department is expected to release a report stating the Obama administration's views about how to reshape Fannie and Freddie.

NASA 'naut Kelly rejoins Endeavour crew

Wife Gabrielle Giffords on the mend


NASA astronaut Mark Kelly is back on board space shuttle Endeavour's STS-134 mission to the ISS, following a month's leave to be at the bedside of his wife Gabrielle Giffords.
Kelly's participation in the last scheduled shuttle flight had been in doubt following the shooting of congresswoman Giffords in Tuscon.
Kelly explained. "Things fell into place and she improved very fast, so the decision became easier over time. I know my wife very well and I know what she would want, so that makes the decision easier."
He added: "I am looking forward to rejoining my STS-134 crew members and finishing our training for the mission. We have been preparing for more than 18 months, and we will be ready to deliver the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) to the International Space Station and complete the other objectives of the flight. I appreciate the confidence that my NASA management has in me and the rest of my space shuttle crew."
Peggy Whitson, Astronaut Office chief at NASA's Johnson Space Center, said: "We are glad to have Mark back. He is a veteran shuttle commander and knows well the demands of the job. We are confident in his ability to successfully lead this mission, and I know I speak for all of NASA in saying 'welcome back'."
The Endeavour crew. Pic: NASA
Kelly, pictured above at bottom centre, will be joined for the 19 April launch by (back row, left to right) pilot Gregory H Johnson, and mission specialists Michael Fincke, Greg Chamitoff, Andrew Feustel and the European Space Agency’s Roberto Vittori.
As well as carrying the AMS, Endeavour will deliver "spare parts including two S-band communications antennas, a high-pressure gas tank, additional spare parts for Dextre and micrometeoroid debris shields". ®

Video - Friday Jan 28, 2011

There are numerous other video's click the link above to check them out....




Davos Today with Chrystia Freeland -  (60:11) 

Jan 27 - Chrystia Freeland hosts some of the smartest thinkers at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Video - Thursday Jan 27, 2011



Davos Today with Chrystia Freeland -  (61:35) 

Jan 27 - Chrystia Freeland hosts some of the smartest thinkers at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Video - Wednesday Jan 26, 2011



Davos Today with Chrystia Freeland -  (60:24) 

Jan 26 - Chrystia Freeland hosts some of the smartest thinkers at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

As Europe Toils on Debt, U.S. and Japan Watch Nervously

The gold-starred European Union flag outside the Davos Congress Center on the opening day of the World Economic Forum.
Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg News The gold-starred European Union flag outside the Davos Congress Center on opening day of the World Economic Forum.

DAVOS, Switzerland — The fiscal crisis in Europe may be only the beginning.
The debt debacle that erupted last year in Greece and Ireland threatens not just Europe’s economic stability. It has also revived longstanding questions about whether the United States and Japan, weighed down by their own debt, are heading for a moment of truth.
For all their differences, the big, rich economies of the world are confronted by stark similarities. Each has a mountain of debt that is proving harder and harder to support, given the way their societies are structured.
Trapped by aging populations, underfunded pensions and social security commitments, their dilemma is in sharp contrast to the current vigor and youth of emerging economies. China and India may have growing pains — but debt is not one of them.
This contrast is on display in Davos, where the annual World Economic Forum has brought together a confident group of representatives from emerging economies and the exceptionally comfortable but increasingly worried members of the Western world’s elite.
“Between debts and pensions, everyone should realize that this can’t go on forever,” said Kenneth S. Rogoff, an economics professor at Harvard University in Massachusetts and a former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund. “‘We’ll be lucky if it can go on another five to 10 more years.”’
Davos 2011
Until recently, debt was hardly a dirty word, especially in Western countries that borrowed to finance economic growth. But few of them managed to shrink their debt when times were good, and instead promised richer pensions and welfare benefits.
In the case of the United States, the surpluses built during President Bill Clinton’s tenure turned into huge deficits during the administration of President George W. Bush.
Now, after bailouts in Greece and Ireland, the unthinkable is becoming more probable. As a result, investors are scrutinizing nearly every country with high debt — with potentially bewildering consequences.
“I could envisage them focusing on California debt in one moment, and in the next on another European country,” said Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics.
“So I could see a series of rolling crises for an extended period of time,” he continued, in which investors “try to bring about the adverse results they anticipate.”
While investors’ immediate targets are countries like Portugal that are easy to pick off, they could yet challenge the United States and Japan, as debt levels continue to rise.
This month, two ratings agencies warned that the triple-A rating for the United States could be reviewed in a couple of years if the country’s national debt kept growing.
A downgrade is unlikely to happen as long as the United States economy and the dollar retain their dominance on the global economic stage.
But more people are sounding the alarm as Congress prepares to raise the debt ceiling this spring and politicians lock horns over how to forestall a debt crisis.
At the same time, several states, particularly Illinois, are feared to be on the brink of insolvency, possibly requiring a bailout. The burden has mushroomed so quickly that some policy makers are asking Congress to consider the once-unthinkable possibility of allowing states to file for bankruptcy. That may be the only way, advocates of this approach argue, to alleviate overwhelming debts, including huge pension obligations that are siphoning money from education and other state services.
The risk is that the mere talk of such measures could destabilize investors’ faith in United States municipal bond markets.
As in Europe, the most troubled states are pushing deep spending cuts — and, to some extent, tax increases — to narrow their budget gaps, leading to more layoffs and slowing economies. Although the United States economy is showing signs of a revival two years after the recession ended, and the stock market is roaring back, a downturn among big states could weigh on the recovery, stymieing broader efforts to reduce the national debt and deficit.
At the same time, financial players are watching for any hidden bombs that might explode, like greater losses in state pensions than have been reported, analysts said.
While the United States is no Greece, “these things turn on a dime,” Mr. Rogoff said. “Nothing seems to be happening, then boom, you’re slammed over the head when interest rates rise, debt hits a certain level or something shakes global markets.”
Japan is more of a question mark. The Japanese prime minister, Naoto Kan, has warned that the nation faces a financial crisis of Greek proportions if it does not tackle a debt that is expected to rise to 210 percent of the country’s gross domestic product next year.
The country has struggled to revive its economy for more than a decade, hobbled by deflation and a rapidly aging population. Japanese savers hold nearly all of the debt, making it less vulnerable to the market’s activities. But the concern is that retirees may begin to cash in their bonds, which would make the government look abroad for financing.
“Japan is a debt time bomb that is waiting to explode,” said Paul De Grauwe, a professor of international economics at the Catholic University of Leuven in Belgium.
If global interest rates start to rise, that could affect Japan’s ability to service its debt, “and then Japan will be hit by a debt crisis,” he said. Once the nation heads down that path, “it doesn’t mean much if the debt is held domestically or by foreigners — everyone sells, including the patriots.”
Analysts say that, as with the United States, any reckoning in Japan could still take years or even decades to unfold.
The more immediate concern is how to keep the debt crises in small European countries on the periphery from rocking Europe at its core.
European finance ministers have been working on ways to protect the euro and are focusing on whether to bolster a rescue fund for the Union. But the survival of the euro cannot be taken for granted if policy makers fail to resolve underlying problems.
Some countries are taking steps to avert disaster. Spain, feared to be one of the next countries after Ireland to need a bailout, is casting its net wide for buyers of its bonds, which it is shopping to China, Japan, Qatar and Russia.
These nations have as big a stake in Europe’s economic stability as the West, because the European Union is one of their biggest markets.
To the extent international buyers are shunning their debt, governments are trying to compel domestic institutions to load up on it. Ireland, for instance, has passed legislation to encourage Irish pension funds to hold more Irish government bonds and dump lower yielding, but safer, German bonds.
In the meantime, something that would help all these countries reduce their debt is a revival of economic growth. But one lesson emerging from the European debt crisis is that imposing harsh austerity to mend finances risks feeding a downward economic spiral. Spending cuts are stunting economies, causing governments to borrow more at higher interest rates and piling debt upon debt.
“‘We know from historical experience if debt levels are high and remain high you will pay the price in terms of lower growth,” said Pier Carlo Padoan, chief economist at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the association of free-market democracies. “All countries face the need, first, to stop debt levels from growing, and second, to start bringing them down.”  

Davos ‘One Crazy, Exciting Circus’

The village of Davos, the site of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting.
Fabrice Coffrini/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesDavos village, the site of the World Economic Forum meeting.

The World Economic Forum’s 110-page program is by turns exciting and daunting. From Tuesday night through Sunday, hundreds of sessions cover myriad subjects. And it just isn’t possible, as a practical matter, to attend them all, as many overlap.
So what’s a Davos Man to do?
Most of the panels have compelling, if predictable, topics, like “The New Realities of Modern China,” “The Future of Investing” and “The Next Shock: Are We Better Prepared?” You might choose which talks to attend by their subject matter, or perhaps a particular panelist interests you.
If you want to check out Eric I. Cantor, the new majority leader of the House of Representatives, for instance, go and see “Global Leadership: A New Era?” Or if you’re interested in seeing Hewlett-Packard’s new chief executive, Leo Apotheker, or at least learning how to pronounce his name, sit in on “Innovation-driven Growth: An Update.”
But while perusing the program, we occasionally came across an offbeat session that has nothing to do with global trade, monetary policy or world hunger. These talks appear to raise the cool factor at Davos, appealing to the attendees’ inner hipsters—or at least their liberal arts degrees.

DESCRIPTION
There are only a handful of these sessions because, let’s face it, this is a confab where Hugh Grant, the chief executive of Monsanto who is scheduled to attend, might cause more of a ruckus than Hugh Grant, the actor, who is not.

Here’s a sampling of the some of the funkier functions, many of them led by attendees who have been anointed Davos’s “cultural leaders”:
•At “Powerful Portraits: What’s in a Face?,” Platon, the renowned portrait photographer, discusses how he captures the essence of his subjects.
•At “Building Bridges With Brush Strokes,” Drue Kataoka, the Japanese artist, discusses how she draws inspiration from the world around her, bridging ideas from around the globe through her artwork.
•At “The Five Senses Experience,” Platon, the photographer, joins five others, including a cognitive neuroscientist and the founder of a “zen center,” to discuss what we should know about our five senses.
•At “We Are What We Eat,” Marcus Samuelsson, the renowned New York chef who recently cooked a state dinner for the Obamas, discusses what we can learn from kitchens around the world.
•At “Film’s Power to Revitalize Culture Economies and Hope,” Robert DeNiro, the actor, discusses the Tribeca Film Festival and its effort to revive Lower Manhattan. Also attending will be his partner in the event, Jane Rosenthal.
•At “Shakespearean Leadership,” Ken Adelman and Carol Adelman, the heads of Movers & Shakespeares, an executive training firm, discuss how Shakespearean wisdom provides a unique perspective on effective approaches for motivation, persuasion and engagement. (They also are holding another session on Shakespeare’s women.)
•In “Exploring the Extremes,” a panel that includes a world-class mountain climber and Capt. Chesley B. Sullenberger III – the pilot of the US Airways flight that landed in the Hudson River – discuss the world above the clouds and out at sea. Sully!
When DealBook arrived at Davos on Tuesday, we ran into the famed photographer Platon in the registration tent. We introduced ourselves and asked him what it was like to be a cool artist surrounded by all these stuffy corporate types.
“I’m always the guest in someone’s house, so I’m used to it,” said the British-born Platon, who just goes by Platon – like Madonna or Cher. “This looks like one crazy, exciting circus.”

This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: January 26, 2011
An earlier version of this post misspelled the name of Capt. Chesley B. Sullenberger III.

Descending on Davos

 January 25, 2011, 10:21 am Davos 2011
By PETER LATTMAN
Workmen preparing the Congress Center in Davos for the World Economic Forum annual meeting.

Johannes Eisele/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesPreparing for the World Economic Forum annual meeting.


SOMEWHERE OVER THE ATLANTIC, EN ROUTE TO SWITZERLAND — “The Rise of the New Ruling Class: How the Global Elite Is Leaving You Behind,” reads the cover of The Atlantic’s current newsstand issue.
The Economist’s latest is notably similar: “The rich and the rest: A 14-page special report on the global elite.”
Both magazines’ featured stories are pegged to the World Economic Forum this week in Davos, Switzerland, the annual gathering where political leaders, chief executives and other big machers pontificate by day and schmooze by night.
I’m writing this while on Swiss Air Flight 15 en route to Switzerland. Squeezed into seat 38J in economy class, I hardly feel like the global elite. Instead, I feel cramped. What must it be like to be one of those Goldman bankers or hedge fund executives luxuriating in business class?
As a Davos pregame warm-up, I decided to read The Economist and The Atlantic to see what I could learn.
In The Atlantic, “The Rise of the New Global Elite” is by Chrystia Freeland, the global editor at large for Reuters who is writing a book on this topic. Ms. Freeland, who also writes for the global edition of The New York Times, lays out her thesis here:
Our light-speed, globally connected economy has led to the rise of a new super-elite that consists, to a notable degree, of first- and second-generation wealth. Its members are hardworking, highly educated, jet-setting meritocrats who feel they are the deserving winners of a tough, worldwide economic competition — and many of them, as a result, have an ambivalent attitude toward those of us who didn’t succeed so spectacularly. Perhaps most noteworthy, they are becoming a transglobal community of peers who have more in common with one another than with their countrymen back home. Whether they maintain primary residences in New York or Hong Kong, Moscow or Mumbai, today’s super-rich are increasingly a nation unto themselves.
Davos 2011
And Ms. Freeland says that “the real community life of the 21st-century plutocrat occurs on the international conference circuit.” The Davos conclave is described as signaling “an aspiring plutocrat’s arrival on the international scene.” There are other rarefied conclaves — the Bilderberg Group, the Boao Forum for Asia, the Clinton Global Initiative, TED, Sun Valley!

She ends on a cautionary note, expressing concern that the plutocrats risk isolating themselves.
“The lesson of history is that, in the long run, super-elites have two ways to survive: by suppressing dissent or by sharing their wealth,” she concludes. “It is obvious which of these would be the better outcome for America, and the world.”
(The Onion humor Web site also weighs in on the growing global wealth divide with its satirical article, “Gap Between Rich And Poor Named 8th Wonder Of The World.”)
The Economist looks at the movers and shakers across 10 shorter articles. There is an examination of who’s rich and how much they have. (One study says there are 81,000 people with assets of more than $50 million.) There is also an essay on Davos, where “the lectures are interesting, but the big draw is the chance to talk to powerful people in the corridors.” Apparently, these encounters sometimes bear fruit. The Economist says that in 1994, Simon Peres and Yasser Arafat struck a deal over Gaza and Jericho.
There are also “the limits of jaw-jaw,” The Economist says. “Yet for all their tireless information-swapping, globocrats were caught napping by the financial crisis.”
Speaking of napping, I’m going to try to get a little shut-eye so DealBook is raring to go when it descends upon Davos. But before I power down, I wanted to share a Twitter post from Daniel Gross, a columnist for Yahoo Finance and a Davos veteran. While those magazines were instructive, Mr. Gross, in 140 characters or less, gave us perhaps the best practical advice for the days ahead:
“Pre-Davos preparations commencing: practicing my earnest nod; loading up on fruits and vegetables, which I won’t see until my return.”  


A Hot Topic for Davos: China’s Big Challenges

Chinese workers process shirts at the Lever Style factory in Shenzhen, Guangdong province.Forbes Conrad/Bloomberg NewsChinese workers process shirts at a factory in Shenzhen, Guangdong province. China faces trade frictions over its currency policy.
SHANGHAI — The seemingly unstoppable rise of China has long been high on the agenda at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. This year, though, the discussion is likely to include a greater focus on major challenges facing the country.
China is already the world’s biggest exporter and the second-largest economy after the United States. The country has $2.9 trillion in foreign exchange reserves and is pushing to build its first aircraft carrier and land a spacecraft on the moon within two years.
But there are also potential problems ahead in 2011. At home, there are growing worries about inflation, including rising property prices and the possibility that a widening income gap between the rich and the poor could threaten social stability.
On the international front, China is struggling with trade friction over its currency policy and coming off what analysts say was a year of diplomatic missteps.
Minxin Pei, who teaches political science at Claremont McKenna College in California, said China undermined its standing last year with a more assertive and erratic posture in foreign affairs.
Among other things, he said, China needlessly confronted the United States over the sale of weapons to Taiwan, berated Japan for its decision to detain the captain of a Chinese fishing trawler and lashed out at the West in an exaggerated way after Norway awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo, a Chinese dissident.
“This may reflect the nature of the regime and its autocratic system,” Dr. Pei said. “But in the end, they’re pragmatists. They’re not led by blind megalomaniacs. So there may be some adjustments. There is some hope.”

Davos 2011
Sensing discord in its foreign relations, China has responded in recent months with what some analysts see as a series of charm offensives.



Delegations of high-ranking Chinese leaders have traveled to world capitals to sign multibillion-dollar trade and investment deals. In Europe this month, Chinese leaders pledged to support the euro, in part by buying the sovereign debt of some weakened euro zone members.
And when President Hu Jintao of China visited Washington last week, China signed business deals that promised to create a quarter-million American jobs. Beijing also tried a dose of soft power by releasing a promotional video showing positive images of China and Chinese celebrities. The images are being broadcast on giant television screens in Times Square in New York.
But those efforts had been undermined by diplomatic stances that seem increasingly hardheaded, said Orville Schell, director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations at the Asia Society in New York.
“There’s a muscular resistance to any kind of cooperation that might seem like yielding to U.S. demands and interests,” Mr. Schell said. “For the last hundred years, China has wanted to be in the position where it’s not pushed around. And now they are close to that.
“It should be a sweet moment. But when such cooperation even so much as hints at submission, it becomes difficult. Especially at a high, visible level, this concern makes the give-and-take that is essential in working out common problems very difficult.”
Other analysts say the United States and Europe need to accept some of the blame for souring relations. Kishore Mahbubani, dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, said the West often demonized China, and Western leaders tended to lecture the Chinese in a way that could be seen as disrespectful and was likely to fan resentment among Chinese officials.
“The West is terrified because they’ve dominated history for the past 200 years and now China’s emerging,” Mr. Mahbubani said. “But we should all recognize that a multipolar world is much better than a unipolar world.”
Still, the ruling Communist Party’s chief concerns this year are internal, analysts say. Top among them are maintaining strong economic growth, which helps improve the livelihood of its citizens and also reduces the likelihood of social instability and challenges to the party.
To strengthen the economy, the government has promised to rein in inflation and soaring property prices. Several big cities are considering new property taxes. And local governments have announced plans to build more low-income housing.
Many economists have forecast another year of stellar economic growth, with the Chinese economy expected to grow about 9 percent. Yet concerns remain about overly aggressive lending by state-run banks.
Since early 2009, Chinese banks have engaged in a record lending spree that has helped back state-owned companies and financed huge infrastructure and property projects. Analysts say the policies probably encouraged loose lending standards, which could increase the likelihood of a sharp rise in nonperforming loans — something that seriously threatened state-run banks less than a decade ago.
The government has also pledged to revamp the economy, moving away from a heavy reliance on exports and government investment and toward more domestic consumption.
Chinese leaders are supporting efforts to increase the wages of average workers and are encouraging more investment in inland provinces, which have lagged far behind the nation’s coastal cities.
But getting Chinese consumers to spend more will not be easy, analysts say, particularly in a nation with a relatively weak social safety net.
Another barrier to change is what some analysts say is a quiet shift in government policy away from market-oriented changes toward ones that back state-owned companies and so-called national champions.
Two recently published books argue that China has been moving away from Western-style capitalism toward what is called state capitalism, in which the government and state-owned companies team up to dominate business and the economy and compete with multinational corporations from abroad.
In “Red Capitalism,” Carl E. Walter and Fraser J.T. Howie, wrote that the Chinese government’s efforts to change the nation’s banks and financial system had stalled from 2003 to 2005 as various government agencies battled for control over the banking system.
While the outside world sees a vibrant Chinese stock market, splashy initial public offerings and new billionaires — all ostensibly signs of an increasingly market-oriented economy — the reality, they say, is a system in which the state manipulates the markets to raise huge sums of money and then forces the banking system to make wasteful loans to state-owned companies.
The real turning point came after the financial crisis, when China lost confidence in Wall Street’s financial model, said Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, a consulting firm, and author of “The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations?” China then began adopting a system that allowed the state to use its assets to move markets and strengthen support at home.
This, Mr. Bremmer said, will greatly alter the relationship between China and Western countries like the United States, generating more conflicts over jobs and market access.
“This has certainly changed the calculus,” Mr. Bremmer said in an interview. “This means the most important economic relationship in the world will become an increasingly zero-sum game.”

A Hefty Price for Entry to Davos

The town of Davos, Switzerland, where the World Economic Forum holds its annual meeting and imposes many fees.Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg NewsThe town of Davos, Switzerland, an expensive place to go.
What’s the price tag to be a Davos Man?
Chief executives, government leaders and academics around the world are headed to Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting this week — a heady power gathering that mixes business, politics and Champagne in the Swiss Alps.
It is an event that draws a wide range of decision makers, from Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, to Prime Minister George A. Papandreou of Greece to U2’s Bono, ostensibly to contemplate how to solve the world’s problems.
Of course, much of the week is really about one thing: networking. As the “Black Swan” author Nassim N. Taleb described it to Tom Keene of Bloomberg Television, the event is “chasing successful people who want to be seen with other successful people. That’s the game.”
An invitation to the meeting is supposed to be considered an exclusive honor. But for corporate executives, the cost of being a Davos Man, or, yes, a Davos Woman, even for just a couple of days, does not come cheap.

Davos 2011

For the past week, I have interviewed more than a dozen C.E.O.’s and other executives who regularly make the pilgrimage to mingle at a high altitude in order to measure the true financial cost for corporations to attend the annual meeting.

But before we get to the fees for private planes, hotels, and a car and driver, there is the all-important ticket. And it isn’t free.
Just to have the opportunity to be invited to Davos, you must be invited to be a member of the World Economic Forum, a Swiss nonprofit that was founded by Klaus Schwab, a German-born academic who managed to build a global conference in the snow.
There are several levels of membership: the basic level, which will get you one invitation to Davos, costs 50,000 Swiss francs, or about $52,000. The ticket itself is another 18,000 Swiss francs ($19,000), plus tax, bringing the total cost of membership and entrance fee to $71,000.
But that fee just gets you in the door with the masses at Davos, with entry to all the general sessions. If you want to be invited behind the velvet rope to participate in private sessions among your industry’s peers, you need to step up to the “Industry Associate” level. That costs $137,000, plus the price of the ticket, bringing the total to about $156,000.
Of course, most chief executives don’t like going anywhere alone, so they might ask a colleague along. Well, the World Economic Forum doesn’t just let you buy an additional ticket for $19,000. Instead, you need to upgrade your annual membership to the “Industry Partner” level. That will set you back about $263,000, plus the cost of two tickets, bringing the total to $301,000.
And if you want to take an entourage, say, five people? Now you’re talking about the “Strategic Partner” level. The price tag: $527,000. (That’s just the annual membership entitling you to as many as five invitations. Each invitation is still $19,000 each, so if five people come, that’s $95,000, making the total $622,000.) This year, all Strategic Partners are required to invite at least one woman along in an effort to diversify the attendee list.
As part of the Strategic Partner level, you get access to the private sessions as well as special conference rooms to hold meetings. And perhaps the biggest perk of all, your car and driver are given a sticker allowing door-to-door pickup service.
At the moment, the forum says it is not accepting applications to become a Strategic Partner unless the company is from China or India and it must be one of the 250 largest in the world.
In fairness, it is worth pointing out that membership at all levels does not just get you access to the meeting in Davos, but also to at least a half-dozen other meetings held around the world. Membership also gives you access to the forum’s various research projects as well.
All those costs, of course, do not include the travel-related costs of getting to Switzerland, schlepping around and perhaps holding a dinner or a cocktail party for clients (which is where the real action happens anyway.).
One large investor is renting a five-bedroom chalet this year just outside of Davos for himself and his staff. The cost? $140,000 for the week. A car and driver, which the World Economic Forum will organize for you, is about $10,000 a week for a Mercedes S Class.
A first-class fare from New York to Zurich is running at about $11,000. But a private plane using NetJets will cost about $70,000 round trip, according to one executive who has used the service. Helicopter service from Zurich to Davos? $3,400 each way. (The forum provides a free bus service for those worried about their environmental footprint.)
Of course, many companies have dinners for clients, with dinners on multiple evenings for some firms.
At the Posthotel, for example, the restaurant is charging a minimum of $210 a head. A cocktail party for 60 to 80 people for just one hour? That costs about $8,000. Two hours? $16,000.
The bigger parties, like one that will be given by Google on Friday night for several hundred people, can run more than $250,000 for the evening. (In years past, Google has flown in the band and bartenders; one year, the company had an oxygen bar.)
All these embedded costs have helped make the World Economic Forum a big business — perhaps the biggest conference organizer in the world. According to its annual report, it brings in about $185 million in revenue and spends nearly all of it, with almost half of its costs going toward events and the other half on personnel.
But all this spending may soon be going out of vogue. As one attendee, the author David Rothkopf, recently wrote on his blog, “The entire endeavor is fading for several reasons, all associated with the inadequacy of Davos as a networking forum.”
He explained, “As Steve Case, founder of AOL, once told me while standing at the bar in the middle of the hubbub of the main conference center: ‘You always feel like you are in the wrong place in Davos, like there is some better meeting going on somewhere in one of the hotels that you really ought to be at. Like the real Davos is happening in secret somewhere.’ “

DAVOS DIARY

I have added this World Economic Forum to my Blog.  It covers numerous articles and some videos at the end.  President Clinton, Secretary Geithner, PM Cameron, Nooyi, and Mr Buffett were in attendance.  I find that much business sense in one place should come up with safe guards, regulations and answers to what happened in 2008.



Davos Contributors

Journalists from The New York Times and The International Herald Tribune reporting on the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, include Andrew Ross Sorkin (@andrewrsorkin) and Peter Lattman (@peterlattman) from DealBook. Liz Alderman, Katrin Bennhold, Jack Ewing, Eric Pfanner and Paul Geitner from The International Herald Tribune are also there.

DealBook’s Annotated Map and Guide to Davos




                                                        Financial Crisis ‘Avoidable,’ Inquiry Panel Concludes

                                                        At Davos, Era of Contrition for Bankers May Be Ending

                                                        Davos: Questioned, but Well Attended

Jan 31, 10:00 am

ALT_TEXT
Lucas Jackson/Reuters
He doesn't go to Davos, but Warren E. Buffett made the Alfalfa Club dinner.

Cutting Short Davos for a Black-Tie Bash in D.C.


Jamie Dimon, Henry R. Kravis, Indra K. Nooyi, David M. Rubenstein and Warren E. Buffett were among those attending the Alfalfa Club dinner in Washington.



Of Wealth and (Un)Happiness

At the World Economic Forum, the talk wasn’t just about money. Well-being was on people’s minds as well.



Robert E. Diamond Jr., chief executive of Barclays
Daniel Lews/VisMedia, via Bloomberg
Robert E. Diamond Jr., chief executive of Barclays.

Words of Remorse at Davos, Sort Of

Bankers were the target of some pointed jabs at the World Economic Forum, as Christine Lagarde, the French finance minister, sparred with the chief executive of Barclays, Robert E. Diamond Jr.



Euro coin
Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg News

No Clear Strategy to Save the Euro

European leaders at the World Economic Forum do not agree on the best way to ensure the common currency’s future, but all agree the euro zone’s stability is worth preserving.



‘WindMade’ May Soon Join Other Feel-Good Labels

A group led by a Danish wind turbine company hopes consumers will be drawn to products that used wind in the production process.



ALT
Johannes Eisele/Agence France-Presse
German Chancellor Angela Merkel at Davos

At Davos, Global Leaders Call for Trade Pact

The leaders of Britain, Germany and Indonesia issued a forceful call to complete a global trade agreement by the end of the year, saying it would benefit the world’s poor and increase growth for all countries.


China

What Is the Beijing Consensus?

While a lot of people at the World Economic Forum are talking about the “Beijing consensus,” there is no consensus about what the China’s economic growth model actually is.

Barry Silbert, chief executive of SecondMarket
Francis Specker/Bloomberg News
Barry Silbert, chief executive of SecondMarket, an exchange for trading shares of private companies.

Voices From Davos

Davos participants like the economist Nouriel Roubini and Barry Silbert, chief executive of SecondMarket, share their views on issues like the lack of global leadership and why the I.P.O. market is languishing.

ALT
Virginia Mayo/Associated Press

In Davos, Cameron Joins Innovation Bandwagon

The British prime minister declared Britain “open again for business” and urged his European peers to take steps to “unleash enterprise.”


ALT
Michel Euler/Associated Press

Geithner Optimistic, Despite High Unemployment

The Treasury secretary delivered an upbeat message about the prospects for a continued economic recovery while providing little hope of substantially improved employment numbers.


ALT_TEXT

Moscow Mayor Promises Business-Friendly Russia

Sergei S. Sobyanin echoed President Dmitri A. Medvedev in an effort to encourage corporate leaders at the World Economic Forum that they can safely invest in Russia.

Davos Roundup: Parties, Shoes and Serious Stuff

As Davos heads into the weekend, the social aspects are being emphasized, highlighting the gathering’s contradictions.


Nicolas Sarkozy
Michel Euler/Associated Press

French Leader Scales Back Ambitions for New Monetary System

A year ago, President Nicolas Sarkozy proclaimed a grand vision of a new economic and monetary order, but in a new age of austerity his goals have become much more modest.


Bill Clinton
Vincent Kessler/Reuters

Globe-Trotter Clinton Makes Davos Stop

The former president discussed topics including the Middle East, American politics and the Neanderthal genome project.


ALT
Fabrice Coffrini/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Few Signs of United Approach to Financial Regulation

Experience suggests that financial leaders at the World Economic Forum will not reach consensus on how to prevent future financial disasters.