Pages

Saturday, January 1, 2011

A new order: House power players to watch in the 112th Congress

This Year is going to be interesting you have many comments that call for Repubs to give us jobs that is what they promised. Others want Issa to find corruption among Dems  and if he doesn't maybe he and others will shut up.  I just want congress to GROW UP and do what we the People want out of them  for our Country.  Bring back the jobs they sent overseas,  and bring down the debt,  and decide how to grow the GDP, and make America the great land it once was.  We have our future generations who need their education and we rank so low that we can not see the top of the pile.  There is more that I can say but I will in the days ahead....

By Alexander Bolton 01/01/11 03:00 PM ET
Lawmakers in the House will jockey over the next several months to establish a new pecking order.
Some of the power players will remain the same but adopt new roles, such as outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
Others, such as Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), incoming chairman of the House Oversight Committee, and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), incoming chairman of the House Budget Committee, will wield a committee gavel for the first time.

Here are several of the pivotal players to watch in the 112th Congress:


Incoming Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio)

Boehner will set the agenda for the 112th Congress because the procedural rules of the House give him significantly more power to pass legislation than his Senate counterpart, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). Entering the lame-duck session, the House had sent 420 bills across the Capitol that stalled in the Senate.

With a large majority, Boehner will send a steady stream of bills to Senate Democrats, putting them on the defensive to act.

Congressional aides expect President Obama will need to deal with Boehner directly to strike legislative compromises, something the president rarely did in the 111th Congress.

Boehner will face a challenge from within his own caucus as he tries to balance the demands of 87 new House GOP freshmen. Many of them are Tea Party-backed conservatives who will demand immediate action on cutting federal spending and repealing healthcare reform. A crucial test comes early next year when Congress will vote to raise the national debt ceiling. Boehner has pledged he will not let some of the more radical forces in Congress allow the government to shut down.

“This is going to be probably the first really big adult moment” for the new GOP majority, Boehner told The New Yorker magazine. “You can underline ‘adult’.”

Incoming House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.)

Cantor is considered an ambitious rising star. Some of his proposals have swiftly gained political currency, such as the YouCut program that allows citizens to vote on specific spending cuts.

Congressional insiders will be watching Cantor closely to see how well he works with Boehner.

“There’s a tacit rivalry but they’ve learned to work within their individual pursuits,” said a senior Republican congressional aide. “In the last Congress, they both did an admirable job of allowing the interests of the conference to take precedence.”

Incoming Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.)

As budget chairman, Ryan will be at the forefront of the GOP effort to cut discretionary spending and reform the entitlement programs that make up the bulk of federal outlays in the next decade. Ryan is not afraid to make politically controversial proposals in pursuit of deficit reduction but that could put his party at risk. Democrats plan to use Ryan’s proposals to curb Medicare and Social Security spending as major campaign issues in 2012.

Incoming Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)

Issa will emerge as President Obama’s chief antagonist over the next two years. He has already set up special subcommittees to investigate the 2009 economic stimulus, government spending and the last year’s federal bailout programs, including the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program). Issa has talked about his committee and its subcommittees holding as many as seven hearings a week. He has also pledged to barrage the Obama administration with subpoenas if they hold back information. Former oversight committee chairman Dan Burton (R-Ind.) issued more than 1,000 subpoenas to the Clinton administration. Issa could set a pace to match that record.

Incoming Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.)

Bachus will have oversight of the implementation of the financial regulatory reform bill that Congress passed in the 111th Congress. Senior Republican strategists acknowledge it will be virtually impossible to repeal healthcare reform or Wall Street reform but they expect a public backlash against some of the new regulations the Obama administration will set to implement the new laws. Bachus has jurisdiction over banking and securities trading as well as the Federal Reserve and the government-sponsored mortgage guarantors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Incoming Reps. Kristi Noem (R-S.D.) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.)

Incoming House Republican freshmen elected Noem and Scott to serve as liaisons with the House Republican leadership. They will give the freshman class a voice in GOP leadership meetings and will press their leaders to take immediate steps to cut government spending significantly. Boehner and other House leaders will also rely on Noem and Scott to manage the expectations of the freshman class. They may have to explain to several newly elected members that rejecting an increase in the federal debt limit or forcing a government shutdown is not a politically viable strategy for curbing the growth of the federal government.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.)

Pelosi is expected to emerge as the leader of the liberal effort to keep President Obama from going too far in pursuit of compromise with Republicans. She was loudly critical of the president’s deal with GOP leaders to extend almost all of the Bush-era tax cuts for two years and set the estate tax at a low 35 percent and apply it only to individual inheritances over $5 million.

Pelosi will play the important role of fundraiser-in-chief for House Democrats, who will have to compete with Obama and Senate Democrats for donors in 2012. Since Democrats have little chance of recapturing the House this election cycle, they will rely on Pelosi to raise money from the liberal base outside Washington.

“Senate Democrats will get the dominant share of Democratic money in town,” said a Democratic lobbyist. “Pelosi is uniquely capable of raising outside-of-Washington money.”

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel (D-N.Y.)

Israel will set the political strategy Democrats will pursue to recapture control of the House. Former DCCC chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) helped Democrats capture the House by recruiting culturally conservative Democrats in rural areas. Israel is expected to focus on swing voters in the suburbs, a plan that will influence the policy positions taken by House Democratic leaders.

Some Democratic strategists worry that Democrats have alienated middle-income and upper-middle-income suburban voters by demanding higher taxes for families earning over $250,000 a year.

“An average couple on Long Island could each be earning $130,000 a year. We as the Democratic Party want to be telling them that we should raise their taxes?” said a Democratic aide.

Reps. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.) and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.)

Crowley and Wasserman Schultz have been players at the periphery of the House Democratic leadership in recent years. The 112th Congress gives them the opportunity to fill the void in young centrist leadership in the Democratic caucus. The loss of 63 Democratic seats in the 2010 midterm election purged many of the centrist and conservative Democratic members from the House. Democratic strategists say that Crowley, Wasserman or other centrist-leaning lawmakers will be need to play bigger roles in order to keep the caucus from swinging too far to the left.

Incoming Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) has traditionally served as the Democratic leadership’s liaison to House Republicans. But Hoyer has had a rough couple of months. Pelosi denied him the top spot in the leadership by running for House minority leader and Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) challenged him for the No. 2 position. Hoyer will need allies in his efforts to reach out to the business community and House Republicans. Crowley and Wasserman Schultz could position themselves as pragmatic leaders in the mold of Hoyer.

“It will be interesting to see who emerges on the center-right of the Democratic caucus,” said a Democratic strategist.






Headline should read 

New World Order
BY DUH on 01/01/2011 at 15:17
Hand that gavel over Piglosi if your claws can let it go.

Then sit down and shut up for the next 2 years while the Americans are in charge!
BY SICKOFOBAMA on 01/01/2011 at 15:21
Boener and company got their tax cuts for the rich so there was certainty in the 'job creaters' minds. Now, where are the jobs? 
Let me guess, now they will have to get rid of 'job killing regulatons', like the minimum wage.

How about getting rid of our "JOB KILLING FREE TRADE POLICIES", that's what's realy happened to our jobs, the were sent to third world countries who pay 40cents an hour for their child labor, WAKE UP AMERICA!
BY WHERE ARE THE JOBS on 01/01/2011 at 15:32
When I saw the "Power Players" headline, I immediately thought about Rep. Darrell Issa. In considering his coming leadership of the Oversight Committee, a few thoughts come to mind. First is that the list of hearings proposed, ie. Stimulus, TARP, etc., is an opportunity for further education of the public regarding these topics. As a proud supporter of the President, I'm confident that an honest investigation will show the benefit of the Stimulus, the early payback of the TARP funds, an so on. If that is what happens, and Issa uncovers areas that could be improved, the country will be better off for it. Unfortunately, many of his party supporters, as witnessed right here on The Hill, will not be satisfied unless Issa proves the existence of a Communist plot to destroy America, lead by a Kenyan imposter in the White House. Time will tell whether Issa will take the high road or whether he will be another Joe McCarthy, bent on creating controversy for personal noteriety. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, I will wish him well and exhort him to make his committee an honest and "unpolarized" window into the ongoing workings of our government.BY SMILINJACK on 01/01/2011 at 15:38
"Boehner has pledged he will not let some of the more radical forces in Congress allow the government to shut down."

If the house brings out a budget that continues more of the SoS spending, it won't be pretty for them and they know it. Congress is on notice.
BY TAR BALL on 01/01/2011 at 15:39
The good jobs are in Mexico. Why don't you go there and stay right after you STFU.BY HERE ARE THE JOBS on 01/01/2011 at 15:49
Pelosi looks so sad it that photo, how sad ( smiles ), I would pay money to have seen her move out of the speakers office - Or maybe she has locked herself inside ( more smiles ).BY RALEIGHMAN on 01/01/2011 at 15:55
"You can underline "adult"." when Pelosi has to hand over the gavel to Boehner. It is going to be hilarious!BY BORNFREE on 01/01/2011 at 15:59
Republicans, who drank that "Tea", should have drank "Hemlock", instead!!!BY ARBUCKLE_DOC on 01/01/2011 at 16:07
• TRUTH IS: Corporations will ALWAYS be CROOKED, unless they are FORCED to be otherwise, with LAWS and REGULATIONS!!!! ~ In order for "Capitalism" to work, correctly, it MUST be regulated, or it quickly becomes CRIMINAL!!! ~ It seems, RepubliCONs just CANNOT GRASP this single simple concept!!! •BY ARBUCKLE_DOC on 01/01/2011 at 16:10

Happy New Year Nancy!!!! Please give my best to the President next time you see him…and I mean my best.BY VERABAKER on 01/01/2011 at 16:13
That picture of her speaks a million words. The days of the traitor Nasty are over. All I can hope for is the investigations will pan out to punishment due a traitor of this country. One more face lift and that nasty beach would have a beard!BY NASTYS PICTURE on 01/01/2011 at 16:18
ARBUCKLE, stop pretending to understand the free market system. What you describe is centralized control like the old Soviet Union.BY USSR on 01/01/2011 at 16:28
To Arbuckle (????? Ok name :)

Free Markets 

Do not equal 

Corporate Fascism 

Do not equal Capitalism

We have not had "Capitalism" in decades 

We have corporatism
BY AMERICA UNDER CHAINS on 01/01/2011 at 17:14
The President cares about who tells him what to do and doing it - nothing more 

It's a stage to keep you mesmerized to believe 
You are very far down that elite chain my friend
Very far down
BY TO VERA on 01/01/2011 at 17:29
We are about to have a cry baby as Speaker of the House of representatives .BY E CALLAWAY on 01/01/2011 at 17:34
To E

Better a crybaby

Than a Marxist
BY NO MORE NANCY on 01/01/2011 at 18:03
Dems don't want to work they want everything for nothing.BY ARBUCKLE DICK on 01/01/2011 at 18:16
Boehner has a purple SEIU is God tie on

Quick - call the bought and paid Police !
BY UH OH  on 01/01/2011 at 18:16
Watch your language squat for brains

Ladies are reading too - place nice boys
BY NASTY LANGUAGE on 01/01/2011 at 18:20

Senior House Republican sees significant support from Dems this year



By Mike Lillis 01/01/11 03:01 PM ET
A senior House Republican predicted this week that GOP leaders in the lower chamber will enjoy significant support this Congress from an unlikely source: Democrats.
Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) anticipates Republicans will be able to rally dozens of centrist Democrats behind GOP initiatives this year — a trend that would lend GOP leaders a stark advantage over the outgoing Democrats, whose most prominent legislative victories came without a single GOP vote. 
"The new House Republican majority is going to be an action majority, and we're going to try to do it on a bipartisan basis," Barton told the Fox Business Network on Friday. "I think one of the mistakes that [Senate] Majority Leader Reid made, and Speaker Pelosi, is they had such huge partisan majorities that they tried to do it just within their own party. And I don't think that will work."
Of the 63 House seats lost by the Democrats in the midterm elections, a large bulk of them were occupied by conservative-leaning lawmakers with a history of bucking their party on fiscal measures, among other issues. Indeed, there were 54 members of the conservative Blue Dog Caucus in the 111th Congress; that number will fall to 26 in the 112th, creating a decidedly more liberal Democratic Caucus this year.
Still, Barton is predicting support from more than just the Blue Dogs.  
"I think we can get 40 or 50 moderate, and a few conservative Democrats that are left to vote with us so that we send these bills to the Senate with a bipartisan majority, in some cases approaching 290 to 295 votes," he said. "I'm hopeful that the president will listen and the Democrats that are left standing will listen and they will work with us."  

Napolitano meets Karzai to discuss al-Qaeda fight, border



By Bridget Johnson 01/01/11 01:21 PM ET
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano met Saturday with Afghan President Hamid Karzai to discuss the fight against al-Qaeda terrorists in the region.
Napolitano is on a multi-nation trip to address security issues. She began in Afghanistan on New Year's Eve, and next will travel to Qatar, Israel and Belgium. 
“The Obama administration remains fully committed to combating threats of terrorism in Afghanistan,” Napolitano said after meeting with Karzai. “In coordination with U.S. and Afghan military forces, the dedicated civilian Department of Homeland Security personnel assisting the Afghan government with customs and border control have made significant progress in disrupting al Qaeda operations in the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan.”
Napolitano also held a roundtable discussion Saturday with Afghan women and U.S. women serving in the region, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Napolitano and Karzai discussed DHS efforts to combat smuggling of chemicals used to make explosive devices.
The two also discussed DHS deploments of border security and customs officials to the area to help train Afghan authorities. Six more officials to help in the training effort arrived with Napolitano on Friday.

Obama condemns attacks, one 'clearly targeting Christians'



By Bridget Johnson 01/01/11 01:45 PM ET
President Obama "strongly" condemned on Saturday New Year's Eve terrorist attacks in Egypt and Nigeria that targeted a Coptic Christian church and an open-air market.
Nearly 1,000 Christians were gathered for Mass in Alexandria, Egypt, when an explosive-packed vehicle just four yards from the front of the church detonated. Twenty-one were killed and 79 injured, and the Egyptian Health Ministry said it was not immediately known if all the victims were Christian.
The regional governor blamed al-Qaeda, which has threatened attacks on Christians in Iraq and throughout the Middle East.
"The attack on a church in Alexandria, Egypt caused 21 reported deaths and dozens of injured from both the Christian and Muslim communities," Obama said in a statement. "The perpetrators of this attack were clearly targeting Christian worshipers, and have no respect for human life and dignity. They must be brought to justice for this barbaric and heinous act."
The statement is stronger than the one issued by the administration after the Oct. 31 attack on Our Lady of Salvation Church in Baghdad that killed 52. Some lawmakerscriticized the White House for not noting then that Christians were specifically targeted in the attack.
Obama offered assistance to the Egyptian government in responding to the "terrible event."
The Nigeria bombing targeted an army barracks in Abuja, killing at least four and injuring 21 in the market's beer garden. President Goodluck Jonathan blamed Muslim extremists Saturday for the attack, which comes on the heels of several recent attacks on churches. A series of Christmas Eve bomb blasts killed at least 80 in the city of Jos, while six people were killed in church attacks in Maiduguri.
An Islamist group claimed responsiblity for the Jos attacks, while dozens of Muslim extremists have been arrested in the Maiduguri attacks.
"Killing innocent civilians who were simply gathering – like so many people around the world – to celebrate the beginning of a New Year further demonstrates the bankrupt vision of those who carry out these attacks, and we are similarly prepared to offer assistance to the Government of Nigeria as it works to bring the perpetrators to justice," Obama said.

Friday, December 31, 2010

We're Still at War:

I am adding these two for my birthday since i was not blogging on those days


 Photo of the Day for October 19, 2010

Tue Oct. 19, 2010 1:30 AM PDT
U.S. Army 1st Lt. Paul Worthington (left), a cavalry officer with 1st platoon, Bravo Troop, 1st Squadron, 172nd Cavalry Regiment, listens to an interpreter while speaking with an Afghan National Policeman about security issues during a visit to a National Police outpost in the Jabal Saraj district of the Parwan province of Afghanistan on Oct. 8, 2010. Soldiers with Worthingtonís unit visited the outpost to check on security forces and to conduct an area recon. DoD photo by Spc. Kristina Gupton, U.S. Army.


We're Still at War: Photo of the Day for October 19, 2009

Mon Oct. 19, 2009 3:01 AM PDT
The battleship USS Missouri (BB 63) arrives at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard on October 14, 2009 to begin a three-month, $18 million effort of extensive maintenance and preservation work. Missouri is the last battleship made by the U.S., and was the site of Japan's unconditional surrender ending World War II. (US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Mark Logico.)

Listen to Tom Brokaw! We're Still At War

 
| Mon Oct. 18, 2010 6:26 AM PDT
Tom Brokaw has an excellent op-ed (Read below) in Monday's New York Times. Here's the gist:
Notice anything missing on the campaign landscape?
How about war? The United States is now in its ninth year of fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, the longest wars in American history. Almost 5,000 men and women have been killed. More than 30,000 have been wounded, some so gravely they’re returning home to become, effectively, wards of their families and communities.
In those nine years, the United States has spent more than $1 trillion on combat operations and other parts of the war effort, including foreign aid, reconstruction projects, embassy costs and veterans’ health care. And the end is not in sight.
We do a lot of national security, contracting, and military reporting here at Mother Jones. (We also try to keep the wars on peoples' minds with the War Photo of the Day.) But there's only so much one outlet with limited resources can cover. So please, read your Danger Room and your Army Times and your Tom Ricks and your Crispin Burke and so on. Politicians may not be paying attention to the wars. But you can still keep yourself informed. 

 
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

The Wars That America Forgot About


McLeod, Mont
IN what promises to be the most contentious midterm election since 1994, there is no shortage of passion about big issues facing the country: the place and nature of the federal government in America’s future; public debt; jobs; health care; the influence of special interests; and the role of populist movements like the Tea Party.
In nearly every Congressional and Senate race, these are the issues that explode into attack ads, score points in debates and light up cable talk shows. In poll after poll, these are the issues that voters say are most important to them this year.
Notice anything missing on the campaign landscape?
How about war? The United States is now in its ninth year of fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, the longest wars in American history. Almost 5,000 men and women have been killed. More than 30,000 have been wounded, some so gravely they’re returning home to become, effectively, wards of their families and communities.
In those nine years, the United States has spent more than $1 trillion on combat operations and other parts of the war effort, including foreign aid, reconstruction projects, embassy costs and veterans’ health care. And the end is not in sight.
So why aren’t the wars and their human and economic consequences front and center in this campaign, right up there with jobs and taxes?
The answer is very likely that the vast majority of Americans wake up every day worrying, with good reason, about their economic security, but they can opt out of the call to arms. Unless they are enlisted in the armed services — or have a family member who has stepped forward — nothing much is asked of them in the war effort.
The all-volunteer uniformed services now represent less than 1 percent of the American population, but they’re carrying 100 percent of the battle. It’s not unusual to meet an Army infantryman or Marine who has served multiple tours in Iraq and/or Afghanistan.
Moreover, the majority of those in uniform come from working-class or middle-class backgrounds. The National Guard units and reserve forces that have been called up, some for more than one tour, draw heavily on first responders, as well as farm, factory and service workers.
Their families live in their own war zone. At a recent Minnesota event for military families, I heard Annette Kuyper, the mother of a National Guardsman who had an extended deployment in Iraq, describe how she and other Guard mothers changed their lives while their children were in harm’s way. “We close the blinds on the windows overlooking the driveway,” she said, “so we don’t see the Army vehicle arriving with a chaplain bearing the unbearable news.”
This woman’s son returned safely, but too many do not. As the campaign season careens to an end, military funerals will be held in country burial grounds, big city graveyards and at Arlington National Cemetery. Military families will keep the blinds closed on the windows facing the driveway.
While campaigns trade shouts of witchcraft, socialism, greed, radicalism (on both sides), warriors and their families have a right to ask, “What about us?” If this is an election about a new direction for the country, why doesn’t some candidate speak up for equal sacrifice on the home front as well as the front lines?
This is not just about military families, as important as they are. We all would benefit from a campaign that engaged the vexing question of what happens next in the long and so far unresolved effort to deal with Islamic rage.
No decision is more important than committing a nation to war. It is, as politicians like to say, about our blood and treasure. Surely blood and treasure are worthy of more attention than they’ve been getting in this campaign.
Tom Brokaw, a special correspondent for NBC News, is the author, most recently, of “Boom! Talking About the ’60s.”